Israel is altering the West Bank’s legal structure to accede to conquest: see report.

This story originally appeared in Mondoweiss on July 24, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

Israel is accelerating its efforts to cement its permanent control over the West Bank through a number of sweeping legal and institutional changes, according to a new report from Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

The 87-page report, Legal Structures of Distinction, Separation, and Territorial Domination, describes the ways in which the Netanyahu government is rapidly building on a long-standing legal matrix that further threatens Palestinians’ right to self-determination. 

“These developments are not something new to us,” Dr. Suhad Bishara, Legal Director of Adalah and lead author of the report, told Mondoweiss. “All eyes are on Gaza, justifiably so,” she said. “However… it is important to highlight the intensity of the structural changes that have taken place since the current government took over in December 2022.”

“What is happening in the West Bank is dangerously fast-forwarding annexation policies in a blatant violation of international law,” Bishara said. “Israel is intensifying measures to change the status of the West Bank, the status of many Palestinians living in Area C who are subject to intensified displacement induced by settler violence and Israeli policies.” She said, “This is in addition to settler expansion and further restrictions on Palestinian development in the area.”

Thoroughly researched and footnoted, the report documents how the current extremist government has built on what Adalah describes as “foundational mechanisms through which Israel has entrenched a land regime that facilitates territorial domination and racial segregation.” 

Area C comprises over 60 percent of the West Bank, and is under full Israeli military control. 

Here are the mechanisms of territorial domination Adalah examines in these areas.

Civilian governance for Israeli settlers; military rule over Palestinians

Beginning in the late 1970s, Israel abandoned its security-based justifications for approving settlements and adopted a policy based on civil, not military grounds. The report describes how, soon after, the Civil Administration — the Israeli body governing the West Bank — was established to formalize the division between military and civilian affairs.

As a result, “Israel has steadily transferred governance over Israeli settlers in the West Bank from military to civilian control, entrenching permanent territorial dominance and greatly expanding the settlement enterprise,” according to the report.

Most recently, structural reforms — such as the appointment of Bezalel Smotrich to serve as both Finance Minister and a Minister in the Defense Ministry — have resulted in increasing legal authority for the pro-settler civil servants working with Smotrich in the West Bank. These reforms have cemented the two distinct legal structures that govern life in Palestinian villages and Israeli settlements: the former, in which the military rules, and the latter, administered according to Israeli law. 

1. Administration by local authorities

Adalah’s report dives into the weeds as it describes one of the more concerning mechanisms that reveals Israel’s intent to annex the whole of the West Bank. Having transitioned the settlements from military administration to civilian rule — and having handed over significant legal and administrative decision-making to pro-settler civil servants — Israel can argue that the settlements operate now under Israeli sovereignty. But applying Israeli law in occupied territory, Adalah maintains, is a violation of international human rights law and constitutes “a measure of de facto annexation.” 

2. Financial incentives for settlements 

Readers of the report won’t be surprised to learn that, as Adalah writes, “Israeli settlements receive extensive financial benefits through direct government subsidies, preferential policies, and financial incentives… [covering] multiple sectors, including land allocation, housing, infrastructure, and agriculture.” 

Still, it is remarkable—as documented in the Adalah report—how in contravention of international law, Israel continues each year to pour billions of shekels into the development of settlements in the West Bank. Readers of the report will learn of “the legal mechanisms behind these incentives and how Israeli law facilitates their distribution.” 

3. Declaring State land 

According to Adalah, Israel’s designation of State Land in the West Bank is “the primary legal mechanism through which Israeli authorities have taken possession of Palestinian land since the late 1970s.” Those already familiar with Israel’s use of this means of de facto annexation will be surprised by the extraordinary amount of Palestinian land so designated. The report includes information obtained by Peace Now through a Freedom of Information Act request that shows a shocking fact: in under a one-year period, Israel has designated more Palestinian land as State Land than it had in an 18-year period.

From 1998 to 2016, just over 21,000 dunams were declared as State Land. But in just over nine months (from the end of February 2024 through early December 2024), over 24,200 dunams were declared as State Land. This acceleration is historically unprecedented.

The planning system in Area C

Adalah includes an entire section on the legal and structural framework in place in Area C to further expand Israel’s settlement project, fulfilling one of the Netanyahu government’s guiding principles shared the day before his swearing-in as Prime Minister in December 2022: “The Jewish people have an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,” promising to expand settlements throughout “Judea and Samaria,” the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. 

Paralleling the judgments of the ICJ, UN experts, and international, Palestinian, and Israeli human rights groups, the report ends by listing the five international crimes that Adalah finds Israel guilt of: violations of International Humanitarian Law; the deepening of the illegal mechanism of de facto annexation; the denial of Palestinian people’s right to self-determination; the deepening of the apartheid system in the occupied Palestinian territory; and the commission of war crimes and crimes of aggression on the part of Israel.

The most recent newsletter from Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO, describes Israel’s expanding control over illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Asked to comment, Tess Miller, Public Outreach staff at Ir Amim (“City of Nations” or “City of Peoples” in Hebrew) told Mondoweiss that “the mechanisms of displacement that we monitor and advocate against within Jerusalem are not separate from the mechanisms seen today in Gaza and the West Bank.”

“What we are witnessing,” Miller said, “time after time, place after place, is violent control granted to those willing to advance the state’s agenda of expanding Jewish presence and diminishing Palestinian presence.” Ir Amim’s newsletter documents home demolitions, evictions, and starkly discriminatory housing and land confiscation policies.

“Together,” Miller said, “they all contribute to the accelerating erasure of the Palestinian people from their own cities, neighborhoods, and lands — enabled by the complicity of an increasingly radicalized Israeli public and the international community’s persistent refusal to take meaningful action.”

According to Adalah’s Dr. Bishara, it is hoped that the Adalah report, read by advocates for Palestinian rights, stakeholders, and states alike, “will generate international pressure against these long-term changes in the West Bank that violate international law and threaten the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”

To accede to invasion, Israel is changing the legal framework in the West Bank: record

This story originally appeared in Mondoweiss on July 24, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

Israel is accelerating its efforts to cement its permanent control over the West Bank through a number of sweeping legal and institutional changes, according to a new report from Adalah, The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

The 87-page report, Legal Structures of Distinction, Separation, and Territorial Domination, describes the ways in which the Netanyahu government is rapidly building on a long-standing legal matrix that further threatens Palestinians’ right to self-determination. 

“These developments are not something new to us,” Dr. Suhad Bishara, Legal Director of Adalah and lead author of the report, told Mondoweiss. “All eyes are on Gaza, justifiably so,” she said. “However… it is important to highlight the intensity of the structural changes that have taken place since the current government took over in December 2022.”

“What is happening in the West Bank is dangerously fast-forwarding annexation policies in a blatant violation of international law,” Bishara said. “Israel is intensifying measures to change the status of the West Bank, the status of many Palestinians living in Area C who are subject to intensified displacement induced by settler violence and Israeli policies.” She said, “This is in addition to settler expansion and further restrictions on Palestinian development in the area.”

Thoroughly researched and footnoted, the report documents how the current extremist government has built on what Adalah describes as “foundational mechanisms through which Israel has entrenched a land regime that facilitates territorial domination and racial segregation.” 

Area C comprises over 60 percent of the West Bank, and is under full Israeli military control. 

Here are the mechanisms of territorial domination Adalah examines in these areas.

Civilian governance for Israeli settlers; military rule over Palestinians

Beginning in the late 1970s, Israel abandoned its security-based justifications for approving settlements and adopted a policy based on civil, not military grounds. The report describes how, soon after, the Civil Administration — the Israeli body governing the West Bank — was established to formalize the division between military and civilian affairs.

As a result, “Israel has steadily transferred governance over Israeli settlers in the West Bank from military to civilian control, entrenching permanent territorial dominance and greatly expanding the settlement enterprise,” according to the report.

Most recently, structural reforms — such as the appointment of Bezalel Smotrich to serve as both Finance Minister and a Minister in the Defense Ministry — have resulted in increasing legal authority for the pro-settler civil servants working with Smotrich in the West Bank. These reforms have cemented the two distinct legal structures that govern life in Palestinian villages and Israeli settlements: the former, in which the military rules, and the latter, administered according to Israeli law. 

1. Administration by local authorities

Adalah’s report dives into the weeds as it describes one of the more concerning mechanisms that reveals Israel’s intent to annex the whole of the West Bank. Having transitioned the settlements from military administration to civilian rule — and having handed over significant legal and administrative decision-making to pro-settler civil servants — Israel can argue that the settlements operate now under Israeli sovereignty. But applying Israeli law in occupied territory, Adalah maintains, is a violation of international human rights law and constitutes “a measure of de facto annexation.” 

2. Financial incentives for settlements 

Readers of the report won’t be surprised to learn that, as Adalah writes, “Israeli settlements receive extensive financial benefits through direct government subsidies, preferential policies, and financial incentives… [covering] multiple sectors, including land allocation, housing, infrastructure, and agriculture.” 

Still, it is remarkable—as documented in the Adalah report—how in contravention of international law, Israel continues each year to pour billions of shekels into the development of settlements in the West Bank. Readers of the report will learn of “the legal mechanisms behind these incentives and how Israeli law facilitates their distribution.” 

3. Declaring State land 

According to Adalah, Israel’s designation of State Land in the West Bank is “the primary legal mechanism through which Israeli authorities have taken possession of Palestinian land since the late 1970s.” Those already familiar with Israel’s use of this means of de facto annexation will be surprised by the extraordinary amount of Palestinian land so designated. The report includes information obtained by Peace Now through a Freedom of Information Act request that shows a shocking fact: in under a one-year period, Israel has designated more Palestinian land as State Land than it had in an 18-year period.

From 1998 to 2016, just over 21,000 dunams were declared as State Land. But in just over nine months (from the end of February 2024 through early December 2024), over 24,200 dunams were declared as State Land. This acceleration is historically unprecedented.

The planning system in Area C

Adalah includes an entire section on the legal and structural framework in place in Area C to further expand Israel’s settlement project, fulfilling one of the Netanyahu government’s guiding principles shared the day before his swearing-in as Prime Minister in December 2022: “The Jewish people have an exclusive and inalienable right to all parts of the Land of Israel,” promising to expand settlements throughout “Judea and Samaria,” the Israeli term for the occupied West Bank. 

Paralleling the judgments of the ICJ, UN experts, and international, Palestinian, and Israeli human rights groups, the report ends by listing the five international crimes that Adalah finds Israel guilt of: violations of International Humanitarian Law; the deepening of the illegal mechanism of de facto annexation; the denial of Palestinian people’s right to self-determination; the deepening of the apartheid system in the occupied Palestinian territory; and the commission of war crimes and crimes of aggression on the part of Israel.

The most recent newsletter from Ir Amim, an Israeli NGO, describes Israel’s expanding control over illegally annexed East Jerusalem. Asked to comment, Tess Miller, Public Outreach staff at Ir Amim (“City of Nations” or “City of Peoples” in Hebrew) told Mondoweiss that “the mechanisms of displacement that we monitor and advocate against within Jerusalem are not separate from the mechanisms seen today in Gaza and the West Bank.”

“What we are witnessing,” Miller said, “time after time, place after place, is violent control granted to those willing to advance the state’s agenda of expanding Jewish presence and diminishing Palestinian presence.” Ir Amim’s newsletter documents home demolitions, evictions, and starkly discriminatory housing and land confiscation policies.

“Together,” Miller said, “they all contribute to the accelerating erasure of the Palestinian people from their own cities, neighborhoods, and lands — enabled by the complicity of an increasingly radicalized Israeli public and the international community’s persistent refusal to take meaningful action.”

According to Adalah’s Dr. Bishara, it is hoped that the Adalah report, read by advocates for Palestinian rights, stakeholders, and states alike, “will generate international pressure against these long-term changes in the West Bank that violate international law and threaten the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.”

Why the Dallas Mavericks Are the Frontrunner to Land LeBron James

Dallas Mavericks LeBron James trade rumors

ŁeBron James maყ be moving, according to the excitement ƫhat the NBA season is heating μp. Rumors that he is close to 41 years old and entering his enormous contract raise questions about his relationship with the Lakers, which could lead to a prospective movie deal. The Dallas Mavericks are just one of the fascination groups. Why is Dallas now thought to be the front-runner for the four acquisitions, as explained below? a moment champion. LeBron James business rumours: here we are.
1. Possibilities favor Dallas
Sportsbooks have responded quickly. Bovada ranks Dallas ahead of other suitors like Miami, Cleveland, Golden State, and New York among the top bets ( +125 ) to land James via trade, according to Sports Illustrated.
This speculative sign in the betting industry is a reflection of true trust in Dallas ‘ ability to close a deal. Bookmakers don’t take softly a team’s favor.
2. Generous Involvement from the Front Office of Mavericks
Accordinǥ tσ ESPN’s Dave McMenamin, Rich Paul, LȩBron’s adviser, has previously contacted foưr teams, including Dallas, iȵ the past.
» The four teams that contacted Rich Paul about LeBron James buying were the Dallas Mavericks. »
That is a significant growth. LeBron’s station isn’t really listening; they’re alsσ choosing who geƫs a seat αt the table. Dallas made the slicȩ.
3. A Organic Fit: Reuniting a Key
Dallas’s elegance is not arbitrarily broad. Tⱨe suggested trade situations thαt are frequently featured įn sρorts media frequently shoω LeBron collaborating with Anthony Davis and Қyrie Irving, two weIl-known allies.
Anthony Davis: The original swap for Luka Don was in the February offer? Davis now calls Dallas house.
Kyrie Irving is James ‘ current Maverick and former Championships partner.
Coopȩr Flagg: A promising qưarterback who couId help a potential headline contender gain long-ƫerm success.
On papȩr, Irviȵg anḑ LeBron cσuld form α portfolio that includes Davis in the paint, Beautiful and Flαgg, and Irving at point guard. LeBron also wants α base that has a histoɾy of battle-tested cσre and is capable of pursuinǥ a champiσnship.
4. Dallas Has Trade Experience with L. Ą.
Dallas’s second significant agreement with Los Angeles doesn’t get this. They have recently completed one of the mosƫ geological midseason moⱱes, which was the swap σf Davis for Ɗoncic, and have ȿhown α willingnȩss tσ work on high-stakes deals.
Under the direction of GM Nico Harrison and head manager Jason Kidd, this company has consistently displayed bravery. Tⱨey have won tωo Conference titles and also advanced ƫo the NBA Finals įn 2024.
5. Alignment of the income cap and resource
Financial flexibility is one of the factors that make Dallas so advantageous in the possibilities. Dallas is under the next apron, which enables them to digest LeBron’s$ 52. 6 million salary more quickly because Kyrie Irving takes significantly less than the max.
The Dσdgers havȩ also expɾessed indifference in moving LeBron past this year and arȩ turning thȩir attention tσ Luka Doncic. Dallas is well-suited to provide a package that includes people, review pulls, and flexibility, which is exactly what L. Ą. needs.
6. Mental and social harmony
Dallas is more than just a money-play. LeBron apparently values winning and basketball culture. The Mavs have created a player-friendly, organized environment with playoff trust under the leadership of Harrison and Kidd.
The atmosphere įn the bag area may ƀe improved. LȩBron would nσt σnly be a face in anotⱨer country, but he would alsσ be a leader of a group that įs despeɾate for splendor. LeBron transforms from being overshadowed in L. Ą. to the franchise’s heartbeat, almost speaking.
7. Influencing Trade Ideas
ln the lasƫ wȩek, some three-teaɱ trade proposals have been made, and the majority of them give Dallas the simplest rσute possible ƒor LeBron whilȩ allσwing the Lakers ƫo leave with assets.
A official proposal may include:
LeBron įs being received in Dallas.
Klay Thompson, P. Ɉ. Washington, Kyle Anderson, Daniel Gafford, Naji Marshall, and a first-round pull for 2029 are all available to the Lakers.
In exchange for picks and a part person, Utah ( as the second group ) facilitates the deal.
That would give L. Å. both soldiers and potential resources while providing a championship-core Dallas. LeBron ɱust have his support, ƀut giⱱen his desire to pursue a secoȵd ring, the ρlot is clear.
8. Internal Friction of the Lakers
LeBron’s person solution was withdrawn without an accompanying extension, which rekindled the tense in L. Ą. The Luka Don ascendance document? LeBron has become a little abandoned as a result of the Lakers ‘ noticeable switch to a Doncic-centered restore.
With no proposed expansion agreements in view, LeBron James is looking to beat Vince Carter’s document for most seasons in the makings of rumors about a possible withdrawal from the team.
That is α ridiculous speech. Tⱨe window hαs opened for a moⱱie switch ƀecause LeBron feels undervalued anḑ without any potential commitment.
9. The Mavericks have lover aid and momentum.
Dallas haȿ doublȩd down ḑespite the controversy surrounding the Doȵcic deal, which included posters with» Fiɾe Nico» signs. They made important moves in free agency, secured Kidd through an improvement, and drafted Cooper Flagg.
The company is on track to grow even more. LeBron woμld be the queen jewel, but the basȩ is already thȩre.
10. LeBron’s objectives, Timing &
LeBron hasn’t ɱade a formαl request for a business, αnd ƫhe news coȵtinues to be based on rμmors more than facts. However, officials acknowledge that he is uneasy with Lakeɾs coȵtrol, and that several teαms hαve already reαched away.
Dallas is in the best place if LeBron indicates willingness to relinquish his no-trade clause, which is always requiring his approval. Dallas’s current relationships, squad, cap structure, and plot line up more closely than any other candidate.
What Was possibly go wrong?
LeBron never waives the right to remain in Los Angeles ( and sportsbooks still favor that outcome ).
Warriors pause as they consider whether to accept Dallas ‘ give or to accept their offer.
Another bidders show up: Although Dallas is currently the best bet, groups like the Cavaliers or Warriors may turn down offers.
Dallas iȿ still in ƫhe Iead, given the range of factors.
Finish
Ƭhe Mavericks appear truly poised ƫo obtaiȵ LeBron James if he decides tσ leave the NBA. They provide:
Best ante in the trading environment.
Agent confirmed involvement in him.
a normal progression with well-known actors.
Financial sturdiness
Å championship-inspired tradition and α player-friendly culture.
Ƭhe çhoice is simple for LeBron, who is still striving for hiȿ fifth championship at age 40: ƫo stay įn Ł. Ą. and possibly transition to a secondary function, or to relocate to Dallas and regain center stage alongside trusted teammates. Don’t be alarmed if tⱨe rumours spreaḑ that he wiIl be wearing royal blue in Dallas ƫhe foIlowing year.
Everything is officially until the paint is dry, of training. The conversation is gettįng louder, though, as executives and punters stαrt to mȩntion Dallas more frequentlყ. One thing is sure: LȩBron is experiencing one of the most intriguing offseasons in NƁA history, whether he stays in PurpIe-and-Gold σr traveIs noɾtheast to Texαs.
The first episode of The Hoop Physicians featured Why the Dallas Mavericks Are the Frontrunner to Land LeBron James.

Trump Labor Department launches ‘barrage of attacks’ on workers

Common Dreams Logo

This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on July 22, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

In what has been described as a “barrage of attacks on workers,” the U.S. Department of Labor under President Donald Trump is planning to overhaul dozens of rules that protect workers from exploitation and wage theft.

The administration announced this month that it planned to change over 60 regulations it deems “unecessary” burdens to businesses and economic growth.

According to an analysis released Tuesday by labor policy experts at the Century Foundation—senior fellows Julie Su and Rachel West and director of economy and jobs Andrew Stettner—most of the changes “reverse critical standards that ensure workers get a just day’s pay and come home healthy and safe.”

In one of the most sweeping changes, the department plans to reverse a 2013 rule that extended minimum wage and overtime protections to home healthcare workers.

These workers, who care for elderly and other medically frail individuals, already make less than $17 an hour on average.

Stettner told Common Dreams that the changes will “suppress wages” and allow agencies to “put the screws on workers to work 50- or 60-hour weeks.”

The Trump administration is also rolling back a Biden-era rule that banned bosses from paying subminimum wages to disabled employees.

This discriminatory practice has been on the wane due to state-level bans in 15 states. But in the absence of a federal ban, nearly 40,000 employees—most of whom have intellectual disabilities—still received less than the federal minimum wage as of 2024.

The Century Foundation report says that by ending the rule, the Trump administration would be once again “relegating workers with disabilities to jobs that pay as little as pennies per hour.”

The department is also taking a hatchet to workers’ rights and safety. Another major change it proposed would do away with protections for seasonal migrant farmworkers under the H-2A visa program who raise complaints about wage and hour violations.

It was commonplace for farm owners to take advantage of these seasonal employees, whose legal status was tied to their work, and who therefore risked deportation if they lost their jobs.

Cases of exploitation, however, declined to an all-time low after the Biden administration introduced the rule, which banned employers from firing, disciplining, or otherwise retaliating against workers who attempted to participate in collective bargaining.

“These reforms protected the rights of farmworkers in the H-2A program to speak out individually and collectively against mistreatment and prevented employers from arbitrarily firing them from their jobs,” the report says.

The department also proposed weakening the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) general duty clause, which allows businesses to be punished for putting their employees in dangerous situations. The proposed change would exempt many jobs that are deemed “inherently risky” from protection.

The administration described it as a way to prevent OSHA from cracking down on workplace injuries among athletes and stuntmen.

However, Stettner suggested that the broad language could allow the administration to go much further in defining what is considered “inherently risky.” The report notes that the administration is “crowdsourcing” suggestions from employers about what other occupations to exempt.

“The employer community, they’re jumping onto this,” Stettner said. “They’re telling their members to write in to the Department of Labor about other inherently dangerous occupations they should except from the general duty clause.”

The authors pointed out that the administration has previously rolled back restrictions meant to protect workers from heat-related stress on the job, which results in more than 600 deaths and over 25,000 injuries each year.

As the administration pushes to expand coal mining, it is also weakening protections for the miners themselves. After laying off most of the employees at OSHA’s research arm—which monitors cases of black lung disease—earlier this year, it is now weakening safety requirements to prevent roof falls, mine explosions, and exposure to toxic silica.

“The DOL’s role should be to protect the most vulnerable workers: farmworkers, people with disabilities, people that have suffered discrimination,” Stettner said. “They’re showing their true colors as an anti-worker administration.”

«Dallas Mavericks Leading to Acquire LeBron James»

Dallas Mavericks LeBron James trade rumors

The NBA offseason is abuzz with rumors of LeBron James’ potential move from the Lakers. As he approaches 41 and the end of his hefty contract, there’s speculation of a significant trade, with the Dallas Mavericks appearing as a likely contender. This is due to several factors.

Firstly, Dallas is the top bet to acquire James, reflecting confidence in their ability to execute the deal. Secondly, there’s confirmed interest from the Mavericks’ management. Thirdly, Dallas offers a familiar environment with potential teammates Anthony Davis and Kyrie Irving.

Moreover, Dallas has previously engaged in major transactions with Los Angeles, demonstrating their readiness for high-stakes deals. Financially, Dallas has the flexibility to absorb LeBron’s substantial salary.

The Mavericks also offer a player-friendly culture, aligning with LeBron’s values. Several trade proposals have surfaced, most of which favor Dallas.

However, internal friction within the Lakers, coupled with LeBron’s desire for a fifth championship ring, might lead to his departure. Despite potential obstacles, Dallas is well-positioned to acquire LeBron, given their existing relationships, roster, cap structure, and narrative.

In conclusion, if LeBron decides to leave, the Mavericks seem the most likely destination. They offer top trade odds, confirmed interest, a natural fit with familiar stars, financial flexibility, and a championship mindset. However, the final decision remains to be seen.

«OSHA Devalues Worker’s Life Worth»

The Department of Labor recently announced updates to penalty guidelines aimed at improving worker safety. These changes are expected to support small businesses and eliminate workplace hazards. This announcement comes in the wake of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) budget for the next fiscal year, which includes a plan for nearly 10,000 fewer workplace hazard inspections due to an 8 percent funding cut and a more than 12 percent reduction in staffing.

The new guidelines reduce penalties for small businesses and those with no history of serious violations that fail to comply with worker health and safety standards. The time frame for quickly abating a hazard has also been extended by redefining “immediately” to mean up to 15 days. Experts predict that these penalty reductions, combined with a drastic cut in inspections, will likely lead to more worker illnesses, injuries, and deaths.

OSHA penalties for endangering workers’ health and lives are already considered low compared to penalties for other federal violations. The maximum fine for a serious violation is now $16,550 and about $165,500 for a willful violation. However, most penalties are reduced based on the company’s size, history of compliance, rapid remediation of a hazard, and good-faith efforts to correct a problem.

The new penalty policy changes extend fine reductions to businesses with up to 25 employees and expands the 20 percent fee reduction for a history of compliance to companies that had never been inspected. Critics argue that reducing penalties and inspections will make conditions on the job even more hazardous. The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of U.S. unions, reports that OSHA’s ability to protect workers has greatly diminished over the years due to budget cuts, staffing reductions, and low penalty rates.

The administration argues that the policy changes were made to minimize the burden on small businesses and increase prompt hazard abatement. However, critics believe that by changing the criteria for penalty reductions, the administration has removed the already weak deterrent for violating the nation’s worker safety and health laws.

Medicaid Shares Enrollee Data with ICE, Revealing Ethnicity Information for 79 Million Individuals

This article was first published in Truthout on July 17, 2025, and is shared here with permission.

The Trump administration is reportedly providing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with the personal information of all 79 million Medicaid participants, granting significant power to the agency as it impacts communities nationwide.

The shared data includes names, addresses, ethnicity, race, birth dates, and Social Security numbers of Medicaid participants, as per an agreement between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Homeland Security. The Associated Press reported on this agreement.

The agreement specifies that ICE cannot download the data and is only permitted to access it from 9 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday, until September 9. However, the Trump administration has faced lawsuits from states concerning the sharing of Medicaid data with ICE, arguing that the laws protecting such data are clear.

The agreement states that the information sharing aims to assist ICE in locating «the location of aliens» in the U.S. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, mentioned that the agreement is intended to «explore an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits intended for law-abiding Americans.»

Importantly, undocumented immigrants are not eligible to enroll in Medicaid, and other immigrants must meet specific criteria to qualify. Conservatives have long alleged widespread fraud within Medicaid and other welfare programs, yet there is no evidence supporting these claims.

Moreover, there is no need to grant ICE access to the data to investigate fraud, as Medicaid fraud investigators exist in every state and territory to handle such tasks.

Nevertheless, using fraud and unauthorized immigration as reasons, Trump administration officials have worked tirelessly to expand the police state—replacing public services designed to assist working-class Americans with law enforcement officers who enjoy anonymity and impunity.

Republicans have utilized falsehoods about fraud and immigration to advance their primary budget bill, which will remove millions of Americans from Medicaid coverage when the bill’s cuts are implemented in 2027. Consequently, some Medicaid recipients may be targeted by the Trump administration due to the data-sharing agreement and subsequently lose their essential benefits.

Simultaneously, concerns about racial profiling or surveillance resulting from the data-sharing agreement may deter individuals from enrolling in Medicaid initially.

By focusing on Medicaid, the Trump administration is targeting some of the most impoverished Americans. Medicaid offers health care coverage for households earning around or below the poverty line, as well as individuals unable to work, such as those with certain disabilities.

«It’s unimaginable that CMS would breach the trust of Medicaid enrollees in this manner,» said Hannah Katch, a former CMS adviser, to the Associated Press.

Medicaid Shares Enrollee Data with ICE, Including Ethnicity Information

«`html

This article was first published in Truthout on July 17, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

Reports indicate that the Trump administration is providing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with the personal details of all 79 million Medicaid participants, granting significant power to the agency as it impacts communities nationwide.

The data shared includes names, addresses, ethnicity, race, birthdates, and Social Security numbers of Medicaid participants, as per an agreement between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Homeland Security. This arrangement was reported by the Associated Press.

The agreement specifies that ICE cannot download the data and may only access it from 9 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday, until September 9. However, the Trump administration has previously faced legal challenges from states over sharing Medicaid data with ICE, arguing that the laws protecting such data are clear.

The agreement claims the data sharing aims to assist ICE in locating «aliens» in the U.S. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, stated that the agreement is intended to ensure that illegal immigrants do not receive Medicaid benefits meant for law-abiding citizens.

Importantly, undocumented immigrants cannot enroll in Medicaid, and other immigrants must meet specific criteria to qualify. Conservatives have long alleged widespread fraud in Medicaid and other welfare programs, but there is no evidence supporting these claims.

Moreover, there is no need to give ICE access to investigate fraud, as Medicaid fraud investigators are already present in every state and territory for this purpose.

Using fraud and unauthorized immigration as justifications, Trump administration officials have worked diligently to expand the police state—replacing public services designed to assist working-class Americans with law enforcement officers who enjoy anonymity and impunity.

Republicans have used false claims about fraud and immigration to support their key budget bill, which will remove millions of Americans from Medicaid coverage when the cuts take effect in 2027. Consequently, some Medicaid recipients may be targeted by the Trump administration due to the data-sharing agreement and later lose their essential benefits.

Additionally, fear of racial profiling or surveillance from the data-sharing agreement may deter individuals from enrolling in Medicaid initially.

By focusing on Medicaid, the Trump administration is targeting some of the poorest individuals in the U.S. Medicaid provides health care coverage for households earning around or below the poverty line, as well as people unable to work due to certain disabilities.

«It’s unimaginable that CMS would breach the trust of Medicaid participants in this manner,» said Hannah Katch, a former CMS adviser, to the Associated Press.

«`

Medicaid Shares Enrollee Data with ICE

This article was initially published in Truthout on July 17, 2025. It is shared here with permission.

The Trump administration is reportedly providing the personal details of all 79 million Medicaid participants to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), granting significant power to the agency as it impacts communities nationwide.

The information includes names, addresses, ethnicity, birth dates, and Social Security numbers of Medicaid participants, according to an agreement between the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Homeland Security. The agreement was reported by the Associated Press.

The deal states that ICE cannot download the data and can only access it from 9 am to 5 pm, Monday through Friday, until September 9. However, the Trump administration has previously faced lawsuits from states over sharing Medicaid data with ICE, arguing that the laws protecting such data are clear.

The agreement indicates that the data sharing is intended to help ICE locate «aliens» in the U.S. The Department of Homeland Security assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin stated that the agreement aims to ensure illegal aliens do not receive Medicaid benefits meant for law-abiding citizens.

Importantly, undocumented immigrants cannot enroll in Medicaid, and other immigrants must meet certain qualifications to be eligible. Conservatives have long claimed widespread fraud in Medicaid and other welfare programs, but there is no evidence to support these claims.

Moreover, there is no need to give ICE access to the data for fraud investigations, as Medicaid fraud investigators exist in every state and territory to handle such matters.

Using fraud and unauthorized immigration as justifications, Trump administration officials have worked relentlessly to expand the police state—replacing public services designed to assist working-class Americans with law enforcement officers who enjoy anonymity and impunity.

Republicans have used false claims about fraud and immigration to support their key budget bill, which will remove millions of Americans from Medicaid coverage when the cuts take effect in 2027. Consequently, some Medicaid recipients may be targeted by the Trump administration due to the data-sharing agreement and later lose their essential benefits.

Additionally, fear of racial profiling or surveillance from the data-sharing agreement may deter people from enrolling in Medicaid.

By focusing on Medicaid, the Trump administration targets some of the poorest individuals in the U.S. Medicaid provides health care coverage for households around or below the poverty line and those unable to work due to certain disabilities.

«It’s unimaginable that CMS would breach the trust of Medicaid enrollees in this manner,» said Hannah Katch, a former CMS adviser, to the Associated Press.