Missiles, licenses and domestic production in Ukraine’s war plan

Written by

in

Ukraine is engaged in a war with Russia that shows no signs of ending. In this context, the Ukrainian government has decided to reinforce its defense industry by focusing on local development of missiles and military systems. This effort relies on technology transfer agreements with European countries and the United States, intended not only to assist Ukraine but also to expand global production capacity amid high demand for weaponry.

Through initiatives such as manufacturing the Flamingo 5 missiles and developing ballistic models like the FP7 and FP7-X, Ukraine has made progress toward military self-sufficiency. Domestic companies, including Firepoint, have led innovation by adapting imported technologies and meeting the Ukrainian state’s needs for defense and operations against Russian territory. The process includes producing key components, such as AL25 engines, enabling local assembly and cost reductions.

The conflict, far from being resolved, has produced a largely static front where both sides hold positions with few significant territorial changes. The prolonged fighting has pushed Ukraine to seek new strategies to sustain its defense capabilities and to undermine the Russian economy.

Tecnología militar y transferencia de licencias

Agreements with Western countries have been fundamental to Ukraine’s progress. The United States and European nations have decided to transfer production licenses for defense systems such as Patriot and SCALP missiles, as well as for guided bombs and interceptor technology.

La fabricación de los misiles Flamingo 5 y el desarrollo de los modelos balísticos FP7 y FP7-X apuntalan la autosuficiencia militar de Ucrania (AP Foto/Efrem Lukatsky, archivo)

The war in Ukraine has exposed a global shortfall in weapons production capacity. The United States manufactures about 600 interceptor missiles per year, a figure far below the roughly 3,000 Ukraine would need for its air defense.

The use of expensive systems like the Patriot, which can cost up to four million dollars per unit, forces the search for more affordable alternatives. Ukraine’s FP7-X claims to be able to intercept ballistic missiles for about one million dollars, according to Andrei Serbin Pont on Infobae Al Mediodía.

European and North American countries are interested in expanding Ukraine’s industrial capacity not only for strategic reasons but also for economic ones. “We want to see some return on the investment, and that means we are interested in these products possibly entering our own arsenals in the future,” Serbin Pont said regarding the European stance.

At the same time, technology development and transfer are presented as a way to meet international demand that exceeds Western production capacity. Western allies aim to share the burden of production and secure supplies for their armed forces without depleting their own stocks.

La guerra en Ucrania expone una insuficiencia mundial en la producción de armamento frente a una demanda que supera la capacidad instalada de Occidente (AP Foto/Efrem Lukatsky)

Impact of the conflict on Ukraine and Russia

Military operations in Ukraine have been characterized by precision strikes against Russian infrastructure. Over the past year, about 43% of Russia’s oil refining capacity was affected by Ukrainian actions. Serbin Pont noted that such strikes exceed two hundred incidents targeting this type of infrastructure, a strategy intended to damage the Russian economy and raise the domestic cost of the war.

Despite these operations, the conflict remains without a near-term resolution. “None of the major population centers they would like to recapture are close to being recaptured,” Serbin Pont said. The front remains largely static, and a political settlement appears distant.

Los ataques de precisión de Ucrania sobre infraestructura rusa afectaron el 43% de la capacidad de refinamiento de petróleo en Rusia durante el último año (AP Foto/Efrem Lukatsky)

Political outlook and existential dimension

The conflict has an existential dimension for Ukraine. Serbin Pont explained that “for Ukrainians it is an existential war.” The Russian government’s position, grounded in historical and strategic arguments, rejects the legitimacy of Ukraine as an independent state. President Vladimir Putin has argued in speeches prior to the invasion that Ukraine should never have become independent.

For Russia, control over Ukraine is a strategic issue linked to access to Crimea, the Black Sea, and maintaining regional influence. The conflict is driven by historical and geopolitical interests, which reduces the incentives for a cessation of hostilities.

The prolongation of the war affects domestic politics in both countries. Ukraine has suspended electoral processes, while Russia uses the conflict as a tool for internal legitimation. The international dynamic is also altered by the high demand for armaments and by the ongoing intervention of foreign powers in supplying technology and equipment.

Infobae accompanies you daily on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most relevant information, presented in a direct and dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; during the week Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé rotate.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; during the week Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich rotate.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.