Cruzamento de dados compara consumo e renda declarada; não há anúncio oficial de nova medida.
Leia mais em https://www.contabeis.com.br/noticias/75043/gastos-no-cartao-entram-no-radar-da-rfb/

Otro sitio realizado con WordPress
Cruzamento de dados compara consumo e renda declarada; não há anúncio oficial de nova medida.
Leia mais em https://www.contabeis.com.br/noticias/75043/gastos-no-cartao-entram-no-radar-da-rfb/
Corte afasta exigência de firma reconhecida, salvo dúvida sobre autenticidade da assinatura.
Leia mais em https://www.contabeis.com.br/noticias/75055/stj-valida-procuracao-digital-pelo-gov-br/
Entenda como a CBS e o IBS da Reforma Tributária afetarão o fluxo de caixa das empresas a partir de 2026. Webinar com especialista em planejamento tributário.
Leia mais em https://www.contabeis.com.br/noticias/75039/como-a-cbs-e-o-ibs-vao-impactar-o-caixa-das-empresas-a-partir-de-2026/

With roughly a month of the 2025–26 season in the books, the preseason storylines have given way to on-court reality — and the NBA Power Rankings look a lot different than many expected. Surprise risers like Detroit and Toronto have ripped through November, while familiar powers in Oklahoma City, Denver, and Houston are already separating from the pack. A few slow starters are beginning to find their groove, but others are staring down the possibility that this just might be who they are.
At the top, the reigning champion Oklahoma City Thunder are off to a historically dominant start, blitzing opponents behind Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and a deep, versatile roster. Denver and Houston have matched that pace with elite offenses, while the Lakers and Spurs have joined the contender tier thanks to star power and improved supporting casts. In the East, the Pistons have stunned the league with a double-digit win streak and the Raptors have quietly turned into a giant-killer, stacking quality wins behind a balanced attack.
On the other end, injuries and uneven play have buried teams like the Pacers and Wizards near the bottom of the standings, with long losing streaks and defensive issues they haven’t been able to patch. The Nets and Hornets are also stuck in the mud despite some bright spots from their young cores, while the Clippers’ aging roster and mounting injuries have dragged them into the early-season danger zone. For rebuilding groups like Utah and Washington, the focus has already shifted from wins and losses to development, while a few “on-paper” contenders are scrambling to fix structural flaws before it’s too late.
With that context in mind, here are The Hoop Doctors’ 2025–26 NBA Power Rankings based on how teams are actually playing right now — starting with the champs.
|
Oklahoma City ThunderThe champs look even scarier than last year, steamrolling opponents with a ruthless blend of shooting, length, and defensive versatility. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is playing like the best player in the world, and their depth lets them blow teams out even on off nights. |
||
|
Denver NuggetsNikola Jokic has the offense humming again, and Denver’s starting five still looks like a cheat code when it’s healthy. They’ve kept pace with OKC in the West and rarely look stressed in crunch time, which is exactly what you want from a veteran contender. |
||
|
Houston RocketsHouston has turned into a buzzsaw, combining Kevin Durant’s late-career scoring clinic with a fearless, improving young core. They’ve won the vast majority of their recent games and built a top-tier offense that travels on the road and holds up against elite defenses. |
||
|
Detroit PistonsThe Pistons have been the shock of the season, riding an 11-game heater and locking into an identity built on length, physicality, and relentless transition attacks. Cade Cunningham looks fully in command, and their young role players are suddenly winning all the little margin battles. |
||
|
Los Angeles LakersLeBron’s return and Luka Doncic’s improved conditioning have turned the Lakers into one of the league’s hottest teams almost overnight. When those two share the floor with competent shooting and active defenders, they look every bit like a group that can challenge for the title. |
||
|
San Antonio SpursVictor Wembanyama has dragged San Antonio out of the basement and into the real playoff conversation faster than anyone expected. Their offense is still learning to live through his unique skill set, but the combination of rim protection and stretch playmaking has made them a nightmare matchup on most nights. {index=5} |
||
|
Cleveland CavaliersCleveland hasn’t always looked smooth, but they’re stacking wins and still boast one of the better point differentials in the East. Donovan Mitchell’s shotmaking and Evan Mobley’s defensive range keep their ceiling high even when the offense bogs down for stretches. |
||
|
Toronto RaptorsAfter a shaky 1–4 start, Toronto has erupted, going on a blistering run with multiple players taking turns as leading scorers. Scottie Barnes looks like an All-Star again alongside Brandon Ingram and RJ Barrett, and the offense finally has enough creation to complement its disruptive defense. |
||
|
Minnesota TimberwolvesAnthony Edwards has fully embraced the franchise-player mantle, and Minnesota’s offense has followed his swagger. Paired with a defense that has tightened up around the rim, the Wolves have quietly played like a top-tier team for most of the last few weeks. |
||
|
Golden State WarriorsThe Warriors are no longer a nightly juggernaut, but when Stephen Curry gets rolling, they still look like world-beaters. A strong recent stretch, including statement wins over quality opponents, has pushed them firmly back into the early-season contender tier. |
||
|
Philadelphia 76ersJoel Embiid is working his way back toward peak form on a minutes limit, and whenever he plays the Sixers look terrifyingly efficient. The supporting cast has been good enough to bank wins even when he sits, which bodes well for long-term playoff health. |
||
|
Milwaukee BucksThe Bucks have been good but not dominant, mostly because Giannis Antetokounmpo has already missed time and the non-Giannis minutes still look shaky. When he’s on the floor, though, Milwaukee’s offense and efficiency spike to elite levels, which keeps them firmly in the top tier of East threats. |
||
|
Miami HeatMiami has once again shrugged off injuries and lineup shuffles to grind out wins against tough competition. They’re not blowing anyone away, but the defense, shooting, and “next man up” mentality feel very familiar come springtime. |
||
|
Atlanta HawksThe Hawks have quietly stabilized after a rocky start, leaning on improved defense and breakout performances from their young core. Even with Trae Young in and out of the lineup, they’re stacking wins and showing a more sustainable identity on both ends. |
||
|
New York KnicksJalen Brunson continues to be the heartbeat of a Knicks team that is bruising people at home but still searching for consistency on the road. Their defense is playoff-caliber, yet they still feel one reliable secondary scorer away from pushing into the top ten. |
||
|
Phoenix SunsThe new-look Suns built around Devin Booker plus defense and shooting are starting to make more sense than last year’s awkward superteam. They’ve piled up wins lately and look like a much tougher out, even if their true ceiling still feels a step below the elite contenders. |
||
|
Orlando MagicOrlando shook off a sluggish start and has looked more like the rising power many expected, with Paolo Banchero setting the tone. Their defense is long and nasty, and new addition Desmond Bane has started to find a rhythm as a secondary creator. |
||
|
Boston CelticsEven without Jayson Tatum in stretches, Boston has defended well enough to hover around .500 and stay in the mix. The offense leans heavily on threes and system play, so when the shots fall they look great — but the margin for error is thinner than in past seasons. |
||
|
Dallas MavericksPost-Luka, this version of the Mavs is more balanced defensively but still struggles to manufacture elite offense night after night. When their stars are healthy they can beat anyone, yet the lack of consistent shot creation drops them a tier below the true contenders for now. |
||
|
Chicago BullsChicago came crashing back to earth after a hot start, but the overall body of work still looks respectable. If they can get fully healthy and keep up their improved ball movement, they’ll be in the thick of the East’s middle-class playoff race. |
||
|
Portland Trail BlazersDeni Avdija has blossomed into a legitimate go-to scorer, giving Blazers fans a new star to rally around sooner than expected. They’re still learning how to close games and protect leads, but their energy and defense suggest this won’t be a typical tanking year. |
||
|
Sacramento KingsIt’s been a brutal opening month for the Kings, whose defense has been shredded and whose offense no longer feels potent enough to compensate. There’s already chatter about bigger structural changes, and for a team built to win now, that’s a worrying sign. |
||
|
New Orleans PelicansWhen Zion Williamson is on the floor, the Pelicans can look like a top-10 offense; the problem is that the lineups around him keep changing. The lack of continuity and defense has left them stuck in that frustrating zone between “dangerous” and “reliably good.” |
||
|
Memphis GrizzliesMemphis still competes hard every night and shows flashes of its old defensive identity, but the offensive firepower just isn’t there consistently. Unless they get healthier and find more perimeter scoring, they’re staring at a season on the wrong side of the play-in line. |
||
|
Utah JazzThe Jazz have fully embraced the rebuild, handing heavy minutes to their young guards and living with the mistakes. There are some fun offensive explosions here and there, but the defense and late-game execution scream “development year” rather than playoff push. |
||
|
Los Angeles ClippersThe Clippers’ age and injury risk have caught up to them quickly, with a long losing streak and extended absences from key stars. Even when Kawhi Leonard is available, the roster no longer looks deep or dynamic enough to seriously scare the top of the West. |
||
|
Charlotte HornetsLaMelo Ball’s latest absence has pushed the Hornets back into lottery territory, even as rookie Kon Knueppel flashes serious star potential. They’re competitive in spurts, but the defensive issues and lack of veteran stability keep turning promising nights into losses. |
||
|
Brooklyn NetsBrooklyn sits near the bottom of the East with one of the league’s ugliest point differentials and a defense that can’t get stops. The silver lining is that their young wings are getting real reps, but for now this looks more like a long-term project than a quick reset. |
||
|
Indiana PacersThe Pacers have been absolutely decimated by injuries, with Tyrese Haliburton’s Achilles issue headlining a brutal start. Without their offensive engine, they’ve fallen to the very bottom of the standings and rarely look competitive for 48 minutes. |
||
|
Washington WizardsWashington sits dead last with just a single win, a double-digit losing streak, and a defense that bleeds points every night. This is a full-on development and lottery season, with the front office clearly more focused on future picks than present-day results. |
The post NBA Power Rankings: Pistons are Red Hot! appeared first on The Hoop Doctors.

When we talk about greatness in basketball, one name still towers above all: Michael Jordan. But greatness isn’t just defined by six championships or unforgettable dunks. It’s about legacy, impact and coming full circle. And this week, Jordan rewrote the narrative again with a move that highlights not just his athletic throne — but his heart.
According to multiple credible reports, Michael Jordan donated $10 million to the Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center in Wilmington, North Carolina — his childhood hometown — in honor of his mother, Deloris Jordan.
The donation will fund the neuroscience institute at the medical center, which will be renamed the “Novant Health Deloris Jordan Neuroscience Institute,” and will broaden access to advanced neurological care, from stroke and spinal treatment to Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
Let’s rewind: Jordan moved with his family as a youngster to Wilmington, NC. After dominating at the collegiate level at University of North Carolina, then starring in the NBA and becoming a global icon, Jordan could’ve simply rested on his laurels. Instead, he’s choosing to make waves off the court.
This donation is also part of a deeper philanthropic streak. It follows previous contributions Jordan has made through clinics and community efforts in North Carolina. Here is the heartfelt ceremony from his last big donation to the same organization last year. Word has it that this latest donation may draw Jordan to make another personal appearance at a ceremony early in the new year.
From a basketball vantage point, this gesture strengthens Jordan’s standing in multiple ways:
The $10 million donation is noteworthy for several reasons:
To quote Jordan: “My mother taught me the importance of compassion and community, and I can’t think of a better way to honor her than by helping ensure those in need can obtain the most advanced neurological care available.”
Whether you’re a die-hard basketball fan or just someone who appreciates a great human story, the headline is simple: being the GOAT isn’t just about what you dominate — it’s about what you give back.
So next time someone asks “why is Michael Jordan still the GOAT?” you don’t have to talk stats — you can talk legacy. And thanks to this gesture in North Carolina, the answer gets written not just in highlight reels … but in healthcare wings, community halls and the lives of people being helped.
Legend. Leader. Philanthropist. Home-town hero. Michael Jordan checks them all. And by channeling his name, his fortune and his family legacy into something that matters — he reminds us all what greatness can look like off the court.
Written for TheHoopDoctors.com — because basketball isn’t just a game. It’s a legacy.
The post Michael Jordan Shows Why He’s Still the GOAT With a Massive Hometown Move in North Carolina appeared first on The Hoop Doctors.

The NBA has always been bigger than the games themselves. It’s a global movement built on personality, storytelling, and the constant exchange of ideas among fans. Today, that movement lives just as strongly online as it does inside arenas, with fans turning to interactive entertainment for year-round engagement. Even light digital experiences—such as Highroller, a top-tier social slot experience—fit naturally into this modern ecosystem by giving fans something fun and energetic to enjoy between major NBA moments.
This shift toward digital engagement has reshaped how people connect with the league. Highlight clips, player reactions, fashion tunnels, and offseason updates now circulate in real time, creating a continuous culture that never slows down. The modern fan isn’t just watching games—they’re sharing, discussing, remixing, and interacting with NBA content every day. Digital spaces have become the new barbershops, playgrounds, and postgame hangouts where fans debate everything from MVP races to classic moments.
As a result, NBA fandom feels more immersive and social than ever. Digital platforms allow supporters from all over the world to join the conversation instantly, building communities that revolve around shared passion and personality-driven storytelling. This interconnected network has become one of the strongest driving forces behind the league’s global growth.
One of the most fascinating changes in NBA culture is the rise of players as their own media networks. Through livestreams, short-form videos, and unfiltered updates, athletes now shape public narratives directly. Fans get to see their personalities, routines, and reactions without intermediaries, creating a level of intimacy that earlier generations could never experience.
This trend has dramatically strengthened fan–player relationships. A workout clip from Jayson Tatum, a tunnel fit from Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, or a pregame joke from Stephen Curry can ignite massive interactions online. These moments turn athletes into storytellers and cultural leaders, extending their influence far beyond the court.
A recent analysis from Nielsen Sports notes that digital-first engagement has helped the NBA become one of the fastest-growing global sports properties among younger demographics. This growth is driven not only by the games themselves but by the personalities shaping conversations every day.
Thanks to social feeds, the NBA is now consumed in bite-sized moments—poster slams, ankle-breakers, chase-downs, celebrations, and pure displays of creativity. This highlight-driven culture keeps the league in constant circulation, especially among younger fans who love fast, shareable bursts of action.
Some traditionalists argue that micro-moments can overshadow team strategy, but the reality is this: highlights amplify passion. A single viral play can turn a casual observer into a dedicated fan. It’s become one of the NBA’s most powerful marketing engines.
Highlight culture also fuels daily debates. Which moment was better? Who delivered the coldest sequence? What does it say about a player’s place among the greats? These conversations extend well beyond the court and strengthen community identity.
Once upon a time, the offseason meant silence. Now it’s one of the most dramatic parts of the year. Fans track training clips, trade rumors, fashion reveals, pickup runs, podcast appearances, and summer leagues with as much excitement as regular-season games.
In quiet stretches, many fans turn to other forms of digital fun to keep that energy going. Whether they are scrolling through NBA updates, interacting with community posts, or unwinding with light digital experiences, the offseason has transformed into an entertainment ecosystem of its own. The culture no longer pauses—it simply shifts focus.
Independent creators now play a massive role in shaping how fans interpret the league. YouTube analysts break down plays in slow motion, while podcast hosts offer unfiltered opinions that rival mainstream shows. Meanwhile, TikTok and Instagram creators spark debates that spread in minutes.
This democratization has opened the door for more perspectives. Fans don’t just consume—they contribute. They build narratives, counter-narratives, theories, memes, and commentary that influence how the season is discussed.
The NBA benefits from this constant activity. Every creator becomes a mini-broadcaster keeping the league in the cultural spotlight.
The NBA tunnel has become a global runway, and social feeds amplify it. Fans are just as eager to see a player’s entrance outfit as they are to see the opening tip. This blend of fashion and basketball has become a signature element of NBA identity.
Players express themselves through style, music, humor, art, and personal branding. And because everything is instantly shareable, fans feel like they’re part of the journey. The league’s cultural reach extends far beyond sports—tapping into entertainment, lifestyle, and global youth culture.
The NBA has always been about community, from neighborhood courts to fan gatherings. Today, much of that community lives online. Fans join discussions, compare takes, create highlight compilations, participate in group chats, and bond over shared excitement.
Digital worlds help recreate that social energy. They keep fans connected when the season slows down and offer places to unwind while staying close to the culture they love. These environments, whether social platforms or casual online experiences, mirror the camaraderie that defines basketball culture.
The NBA’s digital evolution is just beginning. As technology advances, fans may soon enjoy:
The league has always been forward-thinking, and this next phase will make NBA culture even more accessible, social, and vibrant.
NBA fandom has transformed into a hybrid experience—part on-court excitement, part digital immersion. The passion remains the same, but the ways fans express it have multiplied. Through highlights, creator content, player storytelling, style culture, and light digital play during downtime, supporters stay connected to the league all year long.
The modern NBA is no longer just a game. It’s a 24/7 cultural ecosystem shaped by energy, personality, and the digital creativity of its fans.
The post How Digital Culture Is Transforming the Modern NBA Fan Experience appeared first on The Hoop Doctors.


This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Mar. 05, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
Amid mounting calls for the ouster of US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem over her department’s deadly immigration operations and detention facilities denounced as concentration camps, President Donald Trump announced Thursday that she will take on a new role and Sen. Markwayne Mullin will replace her.
Trump said on his Truth Social platform that the Republican senator from Oklahoma will take over the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on March 31, while Noem, “who has served us well, and has had numerous and spectacular results (especially on the Border!), will be moving to be Special Envoy for The Shield of the Americas, our new Security Initiative in the Western Hemisphere we are announcing on Saturday in Doral, Florida.”
The initiative will seemingly build on Trump’s fatal bombings of boats allegedly trafficking drugs and a new joint operation that’s sending US troops to Ecuador. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the governments attending the summit “have really formed a historic coalition to work together to address criminal narco-terrorist gangs and cartels and counter illegal and mass migration into not only the United States but the Western Hemisphere, which remains a key and top priority of this president.”
After thanking Noem for “her service at ‘Homeland,’” Trump promoted Mullin as “a MAGA Warrior, and former undefeated professional MMA fighter” who “truly gets along well with people, and knows the Wisdom and Courage required to Advance our America First Agenda.”
Trump touted Mullin’s Native American heritage and said he “will work tirelessly to Keep our Border Secure, Stop Migrant Crime, Murderers, and other Criminals from illegally entering our Country, End the Scourge of Illegal Drugs and, MAKE AMERICA SAFE AGAIN.”
Mullin’s conduct in Congress has notably included threatening to physically fight Teamsters president Sean O’Brien during a 2023 Senate hearing. His formal nomination to lead DHS will require confirmation by the Senate, which is narrowly controlled by Republicans. According to Fox News, Noem “will likely be at least temporarily replaced by Deputy Secretary Troy Edgar, a Navy veteran and former mayor of Los Alamitos, California, in the line of succession for the agency.”
Trump’s announcement came just hours after the National Review reported that Trump “is privately furious” with Noem “for suggesting in her Senate Judiciary Committee testimony on Tuesday that he gave advance approval of a taxpayer-funded $220 million ad campaign contract that was subcontracted to one of her allies.”
During that Senate hearing, Noem faced outraged Democrats and Republicans. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) ripped into her over DHS agents’ killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis—a topic retiring Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) also addressed, noting the infamous passage of Noem’s book in which she describes shooting her family’s dog and goat.
Responding to Trump’s announcement, Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan said, “Good riddance to the racist, lying puppy killer.”
Graham Platner, one of the Democrats running to challenge Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) in November, similarly said “good riddance” to what he called one of Collins’ “worst confirmation votes ever.”
The progressive oyster farmer and combat veteran also renewed his call to “dismantle” the DHS agency Immigration and Customs Enforcement, stressing that “the sickness at ICE goes far deeper than one person at the top.”
Progressives currently serving in Congress joined Platner in welcoming Noem’s departure from DHS but also reiterating criticism of the department leading Trump’s mass deportation campaign.
“It’s about time,” declared Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.). “But Trump’s violent, cruel deportation agenda didn’t begin with Kristi Noem, and it won’t end with her firing. We need to abolish ICE, dismantle DHS, and prosecute everyone responsible for violating our rights, bypassing due process, and killing people in our streets.”
Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Greg Casar (D-Texas) said that “this is a big win. Kristi Noem was a disaster, and people speaking up got her fired. But Kristi Noem is not the architect of Trump’s dangerous mass deportation policies, and we can’t let up the pressure. Fire Stephen Miller.”
DHS remains partially shut down due to a congressional funding fight. Just a day after grilling Noem on the Fourth Amendment during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Pramila Jayapal said “good riddance” to her while also arguing that “Congress still cannot fund DHS until there is real, tangible proof that this will be a meaningful, structural change.”

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP [CLIP]: The Cuban government is talking with us. They’re in a big deal of trouble, as you know. They have no money. They have no anything right now. But they’re talking with us. And maybe we’ll have a friendly takeover of Cuba. We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Cuba is facing the greatest existential threat it has seen in decades.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Cubans say they are in survival mode, enduring frequent blackouts and soaring food prices as the United States continues to block fuel from reaching the island.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: Well, we don’t have electricity … For example, last week I was 16, 14, 18 hours without power.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That’s Liz Oliva Fernández. She’s a Cuban journalist from Havana. She works with the independent media outlet Belly of the Beast. We’ll be hearing a lot from her in this episode.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: We don’t have public transportation. Only private ones. They cut classes at the university. Now they’re online. But the problem is when the electricity is out, when we are in a blackout, the connection is also terrible. So I don’t have any idea how the kids are going to have online classes without internet or electricity.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Liz says since the gasoline shortage began in January, the streets have been increasingly empty of cars.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Piled high all around Havana, uncollected rubbish is rotting in the open air, much to the despair of residents.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Trash is filling streets because garbage trucks can’t make the rounds.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: They cut the service in the hospitals that are not essential. And that’s complicated because there are a lot of people that are waiting for appointments.
In the last Donald Trump administration, the health care care system has really [been] impacted by the sanctions. Then, Biden don’t do nothing, just maintaining the sanctions. So it’s the Trump-Biden sanctions. So, the health care care system in Cuba has been affected so hard in the last 10 years. And now with this, it’s just, it’s just dying…
The banks are also closing. A lot of people doesn’t have gas to cook, but they don’t have also electricity. This is something that is not new, but has been aggravated in the last couple of weeks. So people are cooking with wood, whatever they can find to prepare the food for the kids, for the elders.
And migration really hit this country in the last past years. So there’s a lot of moms, dads, and grandmothers and grandfathers that are just here alone because their kids just left the country two, three years ago.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Things are bad. They haven’t been this bad in decades. And… it’s on purpose.
This is a humanitarian crisis… made in the United States.
President Donald Trump spoke to reporters about Cuba in mid February.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP [CLIP]: Cuba is right now a failed nation, and they don’t even have jet fuel for airplanes to take off. They’re clogging up their runway. Marco Rubio is talking to Cuba right now. And they should absolutely make a deal, because it’s really a humanitarian threat.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: But Trump, Rubio, and other officials have made it clear that they aren’t interested in anything less than regime change. And they’re going after that goal full throttle. The United States is now imposing an intensified economic blockade on the island nation that is pushing it to the brink — And hitting its most vulnerable residents the hardest.
CAMILA PINEIRO: We can say that already people are dying because of the sanctions. I cannot tell you a number, but whoever is behind these sanctions, they have blood on their hands.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: All of that… in a minute.
[THEME MUSIC]
This is Under the Shadow — An investigative narrative podcast series that looks at the role of the United States abroad in the past and the very present.
This podcast is a co-production in partnership with The Real News and NACLA.
I’m your host, Michael Fox — Longtime radio reporter, editor, journalist. The producer and host of the podcasts Brazil on Fire and Stories of Resistance. I’ve spent the better part of the last 20 years in Latin America.
I’ve seen firsthand the role of the US government abroad. And most often, sadly, it is not for the better: invasions, coups, sanctions. Support for authoritarian regimes. Politically and economically, the United States has cast a long shadow over Latin America for the past 200 years. It still does.
This is Season 2 of Under the Shadow: “Trump’s Attack.”
Episode 7 — “Cuba’s Crisis: Made in USA.”
[MUSIC]
Today, we’re headed to Cuba, the next country on Trump’s hit list after Venezuela… Over the last month, the Trump administration has ratcheted up its actions against the country — With devastating effects.
On Jan. 29, Trump issued an executive order declaring that Cuba constituted a quote “unusual and extraordinary threat” to the “national security and foreign policy of the United States.”
The order accused the Cuban government of supporting terrorism and destabilizing the region. Trump declared a “national emergency” in response to the so-called Cuban threat.
He threatened to levy tariffs on any country, quote, “found to directly or indirectly sell or otherwise provide any oil to Cuba.”
Now… cutting all oil to Cuba might not seem like such a big deal, unless you remember that Cuba is a nearly 800-mile-long island in the Caribbean, 90 miles from the US coast. It does have an oil refinery. But no way to access crude. And… like in many countries on the planet, oil runs just about everything.
Fuel for gas. Cars. Trucks. The electrical grid… and therefore also the water system. In other words, shut off the oil pump and you essentially strangle the country. Which is exactly what the United States is trying to do.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP [CLIP]: Cuba will be failing pretty soon. Cuba’s really a nation that’s close to failing. You know they got their money from Venezuela. They got their oil from Venezuela. They’re not getting that anymore.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That was Trump speaking just two days before issuing his executive order.
Francesca Emmanuel is with the Center for Economic and Policy Research, or CEPR, in Washington, DC.
FRANCESCA EMMANUEL: The current energy siege cannot be understood apart from its explicit political objective to force the island’s economic collapse in order to precipitate the overthrow of the Cuban government, a regime change strategy that the United States has pursued for decades.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: And that’s just it… This is just the latest iteration of an embargo, or blockade, that the United States has held against the island in the name of toppling its government for more than 60 years.
A blockade that for decades has been denounced, nearly unanimously, by almost every country in the world at the UN General Assembly.
FRANÇOIS BLACKMAN: The unilateral economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed by the United States of America against the Republic of Cuba remains a clear violation of the UN Charter and international law.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: François Blackman is the Barbados Ambassador to the UN. He spoke to the assembly in 2025 before the annual vote denouncing the US embargo.
FRANÇOIS BLACKMAN: For more than three decades, the General Assembly, guided by the Charter, has spoken with clarity and consistency: This embargo must end.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Sometimes the idea of sanctions is hard to wrap your head around. And I want to just take a moment to put this blockade into perspective. I’m bringing in an old friend to give some context. I met her 20 years ago when we were both researching cooperatives in Venezuela. Her name is Camila Pineiro.
CAMILA PINEIRO: I’m a Cuban American based in Maryland. And I have dedicated my life to advance the social solidarity economy in Cuba and also in other countries around the world.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: We spoke over Zoom in mid-February.
CAMILA PINEIRO: One way of putting it is if you have [two] swimmers and you chain one swimmer to the bottom of the pool, and you make that chain shorter and shorter and shorter, like there is no way that swimmer can swim and at some point is going to drown, right?
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That is Cuba drowning under US sanctions — The new ones and the ones that have been imposed on it since the 1960s.
It’s like a medieval siege. And over the last month, the United States has tightened the screws, particularly around oil. But that siege has been in place for a long time…
Imposed shortly after the victory of the Cuban revolution on Jan. 1, 1959.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Baring 26 of July banners, joyous followers of Fidel Castro sweep triumphantly through the Cuban capital hours after their rebellion had toppled the regime of Fulgencio Batista.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Such was the scene just before Castro’s advance guard approached. They had marched right across the island in a triumphant progress, joyfully acclaimed all the way. At last, Dr. Fidel Castro himself arrived. Time and again he was held up by the crowds. He spoke to them of the new regime now being inaugurated, a regime, by the way, now formally recognized by Britain.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Peter Kornbluh runs the Cuba Documentation Project at the National Security Archive in Washington, DC. He’s also co-author of the book Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and Havana.
PETER KORNBLUH: You know, the Cuban Revolution of 1959 was really one of the most significant, if not the most significant, kind of David versus Goliaths in the history of the Western Hemisphere. This small island off the coast of the United States took on the colossus of the North.
HISTORIC REEL: Cuba, pearl of the Antilles, playground of the Caribbean, with a charm both old and exciting.
PETER KORNBLUH: US economic interests and US political interests and US mafia interests, crime interests, had controlled Cuba since the 1930s, essentially. And the United States actually had controlled Cuba under a special law that the US Congress passed at the turn of the 20th century called the Platt Amendment, which gave the United States the right to basically tell the Cubans what to do, control their economy, control their military, control their politics… Take Guantanamo as US property in perpetuity, et cetera, et cetera. So it was a symbol of US imperial and imperialist interests in the Caribbean and Latin American region.
And here comes this bearded, uniformed revolutionary who stands up to the United States, leads a rather unbelievable campaign revolution, it’s because of the nationalism the Cuban people, the Cuban people were so angry with the brutality and ruthlessness of the general that the United States controlled Cuba through, General Batista, that they were all willing to rise up, the middle classes, lower classes, upper-middle classes.
Castro was kind of a romantic figure. And he eventually turned to the Soviet Union as the threat, as his reforms teed off US officials, as well as his rhetoric.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Cuba’s plan: Offer another road to development. They rolled out literacy programs and trained doctors. They also nationalized land and agriculture, expropriating foreign companies with the goal of redistributing wealth inside Cuba. It did not sit well with the United States.
PETER KORNBLUH: At his White House press conference, President Eisenhower announces that Cuba’s assigned share of the United States sugar market has been cut by 95% for the balance of 1960, in reply to what Ike calls Fidel Castro’s deliberate policy of hostility… Cuba is expected to respond by new seizures of American properties.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That was a big deal for Cuba. At the time, the island nation was the largest sugar-producing country in the world. Sugar was its largest export. Most of it went to the United States. Suddenly, Cuba had to pivot to new markets like China and the Soviet Union from the communist bloc.
On Oct. 19, 1960, US president Dwight D. Eisenhower announced a trade embargo on Cuba. It banned most US exports to the island except for medicine and food.
PETER KORNBLUH: The Eisenhower decision to foster deprivation on the island through a cutoff of exports was in response to Fidel Castro’s decision to expropriate US properties… The oil refineries, some of the fallow lands by the sugar companies, agricultural reform, and also to receive a delegation, an economic delegation from the Soviet Union that the United States found to be a big problem. I mean, the whole point of the revolution was that Cuba would become independent of US economic and political control. And obviously to do that, it needed to develop alliances with other major countries.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Peter found the original copy of what’s known as the “Mallory memo.” It essentially outlined the strategy for the trade embargo with Cuba. It’s declassified and up on the National Security Archives website. It’s dated April 6, 1960, about six months before Eisenhower imposed the embargo. Subject: “The Decline and Fall of Castro.”
PETER KORNBLUH: It talks about the strategy of cutting off US economic ties to Cuba because Fidel Castro was too popular. And the way to make him unpopular was to create hunger and deprivation. And somehow the Cuban people would blame Fidel rather than blame the United States. And that has always been considered the general original logic of the trade embargo.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: The document was written by US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs Lester Mallory. It literally says, quote… “The only foreseeable means of alienating internal support is through disenchantment and disaffection based on economic dissatisfaction and hardship.”
The goal, it says, is to, quote, “decrease monetary and real wages, to bring about hunger, desperation, and overthrow of government.”
It’s the same thing we would hear a decade later from President Richard Nixon after socialist President Salvador Allende took office in Chile: “Make the economy scream.”
And thus was born the Cuban embargo.
Or… part of it….
PETER KORNBLUH: The US trade embargo was half started by Eisenhower in 1960 and then completed by President John F. Kennedy in very early 1962, well before the Cuban Missile Crisis took place. Eisenhower cut off all US exports to Cuba, and Kennedy then cut off all US imports from Cuba and expanded the embargo to cover third countries and other Cuban goods that might come from elsewhere. The embargo became a symbol that endured. It endured past the CIA covert operation plots, the assassination plots, the Bay of Pigs invasion. All of that.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: There is so much more history I’d like to dive into here today… The Cuban Missile crisis. The US terror campaign against Cuba. The 1976 CIA-backed bombing of Flight 455, which killed all 73 people on board, including the Cuban national fencing team. Clearly… I need to produce an entire season of Under the Shadow just on Cuba. But for now, I’m gonna bring us back to the present and the ever-present embargo, or blockade.
CAMILA PINEIRO: Basically, a blockade is you are blocking anything from coming in and from coming out, and of course they, at some point it wasn’t 100% effective because Cuba found ways, but the US every time has made it harder and harder, and from the easy times of the embargo or blockade, Cuba could not buy anything, even buy any company anywhere in the world, if a product had 10% of US component, Cuba could not buy it. That was when the times were good for Cuba, you know, that’s the minimum of the embargo, so you can imagine every technology pretty much in the world has at least 10% of US component.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Camila also says that ships that travel to Cuba to trade can’t go back to the United States for at least six months. Six months. And that is not new. That rule has been in place since 1962.
CAMILA PINEIRO: There is no ship that is going to come to Cuba that is not going to want to go to the US.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: And Camila says US efforts to undermine Cuba at every turn go well beyond the sanctions: Threatening other countries or companies. Blocking purchases from abroad even over medicine and supplies to fight COVID during the pandemic.
CAMILA PINEIRO: It’s also all the undercover actions that they do to stop anything that the Cuban institutions try to do to develop or satisfy the needs of the people. If they know that the Cuban government is buying some part somewhere to fix a thermoelectric, they’re going to sabotage that.
They do everything in their power to make our lives and the lives of Cubans as bad as they can.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Everyone I spoke to for this episode told me the same thing: The closest comparison to the crisis facing Cuba today is the special period in the 1990s, after the fall of the Soviet Bloc, which for decades had been Cuba’s top trading partner and economic lifeline.
CAMILA PINEIRO: So, it’s like the worst time of the special period with the difference that now you can find stuff, but it’s very expensive. And then it was like, you could not find stuff, like people, it was more equal, so the pain was distributed more equally. Now the people that are most vulnerable, the people who don’t have any income in foreign currency or all people who don’t have anyone to care for, or sick people, are seeing it really, really bad.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: The US blockade against Cuba is the longest-running embargo, blockade, or economic sanctions against any country in the world.
I want to just pause for a minute to let that sink in. A Cuban born any time after 1960 has never lived a day without US sanctions on the island. In other words, anyone younger than retirement age in Cuba has always felt the direct or indirect impact of the United States on their lives.
But journalist Liz Oliva Fernández says that’s hard to put into perspective when you are struggling to get by from one day to the next.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: The sanctions [are] so big and people are so busy surviving the day by day life that they don’t have enough time to pay attention to today. OK, let me see the political picture, the big picture. People are trying to, oh my god, the price of the chicken. Oh my god, we don’t have eggs. Oh my god, it’s impossible for me to pay to buy eggs and to pay transportation or buy chicken. I need to decide. I’m thinking about a circumstance or to buy medications. People are really doing triage right now.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Here’s the thing: It didn’t have to be like this.
BARACK OBAMA [CLIP]: I have come here to bury the last remnant of the Cold War in the Americas.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: I know this seems like ancient history, but President Barack Obama made huge strides toward renewing relations with Cuba. When he was in office, exactly a decade ago this month, he was the first US president to travel to Cuba in almost 90 years.
Peter Kornbluh.
PETER KORNBLUH: And that was to create momentum for the breakthrough in normalized relations. And at the time, he brought a whole entourage of US businessmen. People wanted to start to invest in Cuba. Cuban entrepreneurs felt supported for the first time and an opening for the first time. Yes, that situation didn’t work out, but it didn’t work out because Donald Trump came in and abrogated the deal with Cuba that President Obama had made. And cutting off that relationship, which was creating significant change both in US-Cuban relations and on the island in terms of economic development, was a major contribution to the situation right now.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Instead…
PETER KORNBLUH: There’s still some food in the farmers markets, and people who have access to dollars and are in the private sector are still able to get food. Other parts of the country are not, however, and that is the majority of Cubans.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Peter Kornbluh was in Cuba in late February on a fact-finding trip to get a sense of the reality on the ground.
PETER KORNBLUH: Transportation is hampered. Trucks are not on the highways any longer. The tourism sector is quickly shutting down…. And this is having not just a ripple effect in the economy, but a tsunami effect on the economy in a very short period of time. So Cuba is in a dire economic position, which is what Donald Trump wants. He wants to pressure Cuba to cry uncle and basically come to the negotiating table ready to concede their sovereignty.
We have the president of the United States beginning to imagine and declare that we’re going to have some sort of US friendly takeover of Cuba. Hopefully there will be some kind of agreement that benefits both the Cuban people and US interests, but nobody should forget that agreement is going to come at the end of a very threatening, coercive dagger emanating from Washington, pointing right at the heart of the nation of Cuba.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: Well, over the last 60 years, the US has methodically made it very difficult for Cuba to have normal trade relations in the world.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Medea Benjamin is the founder of the peace group CODEPINK. She’s traveled to Cuba twice over the last month to bring humanitarian aid to the country.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: This gets better in certain times, like when Barack Obama was president, and then it goes back again, and Trump has tightened the screws. But what it means is that Cuba was never able to really try to reach its potential because it always came up against US efforts to sabotage.
The sanctions, when they’re at their worst, don’t let Cuba deal with the international financial system. They make it impossible for Cuba to use what’s called the SWIFT system. So Cuba doesn’t have the ability to have credit. When it buys anything it has to do it in cash. People in Cuba now don’t have access to things that have, for example, you can’t use Zoom, you can’t use PayPal, you can’t use GoFundMe, you can’t use these kinds of things that other people around the world use.
It’s hard to send remittances back to your family, very hard. Other countries, poor countries, their number one source of income is money that people who’ve left the country send back to their families, remittances. Cuba, it used to be you could send through Western Union. Now the US closed that down. They closed down other avenues. So people literally have to carry the money to take to relatives.
So you look at any area where Cuba has tried to either act like a normal country with normal trade relations or has tried to find different ways to get income like that medical missions program that became, at one point, the source, the number one source of hard currency to the country, these sanctions have made it impossible.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Cuban journalist Liz Oliva Fernández says she was recently speaking with the Cuban American lawyer Alfred de Zayas, and he told her we shouldn’t be using the term “sanctions.”
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: He would say, don’t say sanctions anymore, because sanctions are legal. These are unilateral coercive measures against one country. And this is illegal [according to] international law.
And don’t say anything like “compliance,” because you can’t comply with something that is illegal, that makes you [an] accomplice [to] it.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: It’s hard to describe the very real impact US sanctions have on people and communities in Cuba or anyplace. The narratives we hear usually downplay the damage or skew the story. We’re told the financial or humanitarian crises caused in large part by the sanctions are really to be blamed on the Cuban government’s poor management or quote “repressive apparatus.” This is what we’re hearing from many US news outlets, analysts, and lawmakers.
Florida Republican Congressman Carlos Giménez spoke to Fox News in early February.
REP. CARLOS GIMÉNEZ [CLIP]: That regime is a cancer. A cancer to the Cuban people. A cancer to the Western Hemisphere. We need some harsh medicine to cure the patient Cuba. We need some harsh medicine to cure the patient Cuba so we can get rid of this cancer which is the communist regime that has basically oppressed its only people for over 65 years… So they’ve been a real thorn in our side for a long time, and I’m very glad that the president is taking decisive action.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: I saw the direct impact of sanctions first hand in Venezuela in 2019. I traveled there to investigate how ramped-up US sanctions under Trump were impacting the lives of everyday residents. What I found was shocking.
Entire shelves of pharmacies were empty. Parents couldn’t get even basic medicine for their kids. The little medicine that was there was too expensive for most people. Much like the case with Cuba, US sanctions had blocked Venezuela from using international banking systems and threatened actions against other countries that would trade with Venezuela.
One day, I traveled up into a maze of cinderblock homes in the poor barrio of Caucaguita, in eastern Caracas. I was there to meet Carolina Subero, who lived with her mother, sister, and three kids in a minuscule 2-bedroom home. Her youngest daughter, then 5-year-old Jenjerlys, needed four different medications for her epilepsy. But Carolina could only find one of the drugs, and she could only afford it some of the time.
“She has seizures every day,” Carolina told me. “I’ve had to trade food for the medicine.”
Hers was one of countless stories I heard.
According to a 2019 report by the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research, Jenjerlys was one of an estimated 300,000 people at risk because of a lack of medicines or treatment due to the US sanctions on the country.
In Caracas, broken vehicles lined the winding roadsides of the poor barrios because parts largely came from abroad… and they were either impossible to find, or too expensive. The same went for broken water pumps and pipes, leaving entire residential water systems out of commission.
The line from the US government and the mainstream media was that the Maduro administration had run the country into the ground. The reality, however, was that the United States was blocking Venezuela from both buying products abroad and selling its oil — The country’s top source of income. The United States threatened repercussions on anyone who dared to trade with Caracas, and it forced many US businesses out of Venezuela. During a meeting between Trump and executives of US oil companies this January, the director of the oil company Halliburton underscored this point.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP [CLIP]: When did you leave Venezuela?
HALLIBURTON EXECUTIVE [CLIP]: As a company, we left under the sanctions in 2019. So we had intended to stay, and then when the sanctions went into place we were required to leave.
GREG WILPERT: Actually, the sanctions have a tremendous impact on Venezuela’s economy and its ability to import essential goods.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Greg Wilpert is the founder of the independent new site Venezuelanalysis and the author of the 2007 book about then-President Hugo Chávez, Changing Venezuela by Taking Power.
GREG WILPERT: I would estimate that something like 80% of the economic problems, whether it’s the decline in GDP or the increase in inflation, are attributable basically to the sanctions.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: In other words… the United States was slowly strangling Venezuela… and not just the government. The people. The nation. According to that report by the Center for Economic and Policy Research that I mentioned earlier, between 2017 and 2019 the US sanctions on Venezuela killed 40,000 people.
A study co-authored by the same organization in 2025 and published in The Lancet Global Health journal estimated that more than half a million people die around the world each year from sanctions.
Put another way… more people are killed each year by sanctions than by wars across the planet.
[SILENCE]
The authors of the report found that most of the sanctions-related deaths over the last five decades were children under the age of five.
By far… the United States is the top country in the world that uses sanctions as coercive measures against its political adversaries and their populations. In fact, according to Barnard College American studies professor Manu Karuka, the United States has imposed roughly two-thirds of the world’s sanctions since the 1990s. In other words, double all of the sanctions imposed by the entire rest of the planet combined.
REP. RASHIDA TLAIB [CLIP]: The people of Cuba are starving because of our country. They are cutting them off from the rest of the world through sanctions and total blockade of fuel. A country of 11 million people without fuel.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Michigan Democrat Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib spoke out in defense of Cuba in mid February.
REP. RASHIDA TLAIB [CLIP]: Think about that. Homes, schools, hospitals without power. Children without food or medicine. The forced starvation of entire, again, Cuban people. This is pure cruelty. And we all say it together: let Cuba live.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Back in Cuba… following Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order, journalist Liz Oliva Fernández went to the streets to ask people in Havana what they thought about the US measures against them.
“Who do these sanctions affect the most?” asks Liz.
“The people,” says a woman holding a baby.
“What about the blackouts?” asks Liz.
“Oh… that’s the worst of it,” says the woman.
Liz goes to a taxi stand in Havana, where rows of old classic yellow and black Peugeot 504 sedans are lined up along the side of the road.
“Why are there so many cars waiting?” she asks.
“Because we don’t have gas to be able to work,” says one driver.
“We are here waiting to get gas,” says another, “so we can fulfill our social duties, which includes taking people to dialysis, working with the funeral homes, and the schools that don’t have parental support. That’s the main purpose of these vehicles.”
“And how long have you been waiting for gas?” Liz asks.
“Well, on average, we’ve been waiting 24 to 72 hours,” says the man.
She did that story at the end of January. It’s become so much worse now.
“These measures are hurting families,” the taxi driver tells Liz. “That’s where we’re hurting. That’s what’s bleeding, due to all these measures.”
“But the US says they are doing this for the good of Cubans,” says Liz.
“It’s not for the good of Cubans,” says a woman in a striped shirt and a winter hat. “It’s what’s harming all Cubans. What I don’t understand is how a country like the United States tells the whole world what to do. They want to be the rulers, trying to destroy Cuba.
“They’re not going to destroy Cuba,” the woman says. “But it’s always been like this. Because I’m 61 years old, and for as long as I can remember, I’ve felt the blockade, the blockade, the blockade. When will this blockade end?” she asks.
When will this blockade end.
Liz told me she was surprised by the defiant reaction of the people she interviewed.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: People were really angry. They were really angry, but they weren’t really angry with the government. They were really angry with the US government. And I was surprised of that because even when the sanctions [have] a huge impact [on] the life of people in Cuba, there is a lot of people, the most of them, they don’t really understand. So when you talk to them about the impact of the sanctions, they say, yeah, well yeah the blockade is true, but the government, the Cuban government.
So people, [it is] really difficult [for] them [to] understand how this has to [do] with my life, with my family, with me, because this is not sanctions against Liz Oliva Fernández or her family. This is a sanctions against just a country.
And also the narrative on the Internet, like they repeat US government, repeat US politicians, Cuban Americans, repeat all the time… the sanctions just affect the government, the sanctions don’t affect the Cuban people. If you get affected, it’s because the blockade in your own country. Well, this is the biggest lie and also misleading.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: In other words… the line from the Trump administration and in the mainstream media is that if things are bad, it’s because of the Cuban government, not the United States.
The US ambassador to Cuba Mike Hammer has said this outright on numerous occasions recently.
“The financial situation in Cuba has deteriorated,” he told the Miami-based Spanish-language television station Telemundo in early February. “The situation of the energy infrastructure is collapsing. Everything is getting worse. Tourism is clearly impacted. Because who’s going to go to a country without electricity and where crime is rising little by little? Where there are no services?”
This, he explained, was why Cuba needed regime change. And he said that would come some time this year. In another interview with the same outlet roughly a week after Trump’s new sanctions, he denied the blockade had any impact on the island.
MIKE HAMMER [CLIP]: The only blockade here, in Cuba, is internal. Because they know. They eat chicken from the United States. They receive medicine from their relatives in the United States. There is trade between the two countries. Cuba can trade with all the countries in the world it wants, and this about the blockade just isn’t true. It’s not true.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Journalist Liz Oliva Fernández watched the interviews.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: And I say, oh my God, shut up. You can’t be serious. You’re talking about the biggest country of the world, the most powerful country of the world, [the] United States, that you always praise about it, are imposing an oil blockade on an entire, a small nation [in] the Caribbean with 9 million something of population. And you’re saying that they’re not having any effects?
Where [are we] going to get the oil for [keeping] the country running? And we don’t think about this, but the entire countries, not just Cuba, around the world run by oil. So how [are we] going to survive this if everyone is so afraid of the United States?
How [can we] stop the US government? Because I don’t feel that no one in this world can feel safe. Because yesterday, Greenland, before yesterday, Venezuela, then Cuba, then what? Who’s it gonna be tomorrow?
And I feel like many people feel safe because, it’s like, well, only it’s not Cuba, it’s not Venezuela, it’s not Greenland. But do you know, maybe when it’s your turn, there’s no one left to help you.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Now… I want to clarify something here that I think is important. Under normal circumstances, when there is not an oil embargo on the country… despite the blockade, Cuba does buy food from the United States. Millions of dollars worth each year. Poultry, swine, milk, and even coffee. These and other products are exempted. They began to be permitted in 2000 after the United States passed a trade bill which allowed for the export of certain food and medicine.
This is likely, in part, what US Ambassador Mike Hammer was talking about. But Cuba can only purchase these products with cash. Not credit. And everything else regarding the blockade that Medea Benjamin talked about earlier remains in place.
If all of this weren’t confusing enough, Trump in late February said he would now begin to allow some US companies to send fuel to businesses in Cuba, just as long as they are not tied to the Cuban government.
The goal in other words… isolate the Cuban government. Support the private sector.
Peter Kornbluh.
PETER KORNBLUH: The Trump administration is trying to bolster that part of the society. They want to keep the private sector going because, of course, they see the private sector as key to the future of Cuba and Cuba’s evolution to a capitalist and prosperous society.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: As for the blockade, historian William LeoGrande wrote on the 60th anniversary of its implementation, the US economic embargo against Cuba — Or ‘el bloqueo,’ as Cubans refer to it — Is not a single law, but a complex patchwork of laws, presidential proclamations, and regulations that Fidel Castro once called ‘a tangled ball of yarn.’
The goal today, as it was nearly 65 years ago… force Cuba and its people to their knees, with the goal of removing the Cuban government. Members of the Cuban American community in the United States are applauding.
Here’s just one example.
MARIA SALAZAR: We are in Miami. We’re the Cuban Americans in Miami, and we’re delighted that we’re seeing the light at the end of the tunnel.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Maria Salazar is a Cuban American congresswoman from Florida. She was interviewed by Fox News in mid-February.
MARIA SALAZAR: These are glorious, momentous times for the Cubans in Miami that I represent and for the Western Hemisphere. So, Trump, bravo. Venezuela first. Cuba second.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Journalist Liz Oliva Fernández.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: I really get surprised when I read in social media people that are really glad and they are celebrating this situation about how now Cuba’s gonna be free. And I just think about, like, I don’t believe that the United States can bring some freedom, any freedom to Cuba or to [any] country of the world, because first you need to be free yourself. And that’s something that the United States needs to work on. But then how is it possible that you feel like a victory when some people have to die or some people have to suffer? That’s not a victory at all.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Liz says she thinks that people in Cuba are, for the first time, really grasping not only the real impact of the blockade but also how US and Cuban American politicians are quick to use Cuban people on the island as bargaining chips in their political gambles on regime change.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: Because they are saying, oh, oh well, if a mother [has] to be hungry and a kid doesn’t have access to medication, and this is the price that we need to pay, well, we need to pay in in order to get freedom.
And people are like, wait, what? It’s not your kid, it’s not your mom, it’s not your people. You’re saying that you’re Cuba, but you never put a foot in Cuba. And also you are not here to pay the price. So, who actually are the people who are paying the price? The people, and for the first time they really understand the whole thing. I think this thing has always been real, but for the first time in decades, I think it’s crystal clear.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Crystal clear that the United States is forcing the island and its residents to their knees. And it’s not messing around. It wants the Cuban leadership out. And it doesn’t matter if it causes people to suffer there.
Trump’s Cuban American Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this explicitly during a Senate foreign relations committee hearing in late January, after Democrat Senator Brian Schatz pushed him on this issue.
SEN. BRIAN SCHATZ: I’m not asking you whether we would prefer a different kind of government. I’m asking whether you are trying to precipitate the fall of the current regime.
MARCO RUBIO: Yeah, but that’s statutory. The Helms-Burton Act, the US embargo on Cuba is codified. It was codified in law and it requires regime change in order for us to lift the embargo.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: The Helms-Burton Act was passed in 1996 under the Clinton administration. It essentially strengthened the US embargo on Cuba by placing sanctions on foreign companies trading or doing business with the island nation.
We have rarely seen such a candid remark from a top US official openly admitting to pushing to overthrow another nation’s government, including Cuba.
And the United States is taking everything to a whole new level.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Tonight, an elite Coast Guard team rappelling out of helicopters onto the deck of an oil tanker off of the Venezuelan coast, executing a seizure warrant, according to Attorney General Pam Bondi.
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP [CLIP]: We’ve just seized an oil tanker off the coast of Venezuela. Large tanker. Very larger. Largest one ever seized, actually.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: The seizure of this oil tanker in December was the first of many. The goal… Stopping Venezuelan oil shipments. And now blocking oil from Cuba.
This news report was from late February.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: A tanker full of fuel from Russia that was headed to Cuba appears to have been diverted.
PETER KORNBLUH: There was a Russian tanker that was on its way to Cuba. It is stopped in the middle of the Atlantic and apparently is being rerouted someplace else. One can only presume that there was a threat that it might be intercepted by the US Coast Guard, creating the first superpower conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.
Trump and Rubio want to actually control the spigot of oil that can go to Cuba so that they have basically the ultimate negotiating tool. We will turn the lights back on in your country if you agree to the economic terms and economic reforms that we want to start with.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: Secretary of State Marco Rubio said this about Cuba in late February.
MARCO RUBIO: That is not a system that’s working. That’s a system that’s in collapse. And they need to make dramatic reforms. And if they wanna make those dramatic reforms… that open the space for both economic and eventually political freedom for the people of Cuba, obviously the United States would love to see that and would be helpful.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: CODEPINK’s Medea Benjamin.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: Marco Rubio and Trump and these right-wing people in Southern Florida smell blood and they feel like this is the time that they can really overturn the government. Cuba still has a lot of friends around the world, as you see in the votes in the United Nations where the world comes together and denounces the US policies.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: And some of Cuba’s friends are responding to the nation’s crisis.
SPEAKER [CLIP]: Canada has announced an additional $8 million to support Cuba.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Two navy vessels carrying humanitarian aid set sail from Mexico. The shipments are loaded with powdered milk, beans, and other non-perishable goods.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: While oil, for now, is off the table, Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum says Mexico will continue to send humanitarian aid.
In Mexico City’s Zócalo, and other city squares around the country, groups are collecting aid to bring to Cuba.
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: “We’re here from 11am to 6pm,” says one of the organizers of the humanitarian aid collection center in the Zócalo. “We invite everyone to put their little grain, a huge grain of sand, to break this siege, that the blockade has become more severe in this Trump era, and we need to support Cuba, which has given us so much, particularly to the Mexican people.”
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: She mentioned the more than 3,000 Cuban doctors who are still serving in medical missions in impoverished communities across Mexico.
Though the United States has been pressuring other countries, like Guatemala, to send the Cuban doctors home, there are still more than 24,000 Cuban doctors working in more than 50 countries around the world in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and even Europe.
Solidarity groups from the United States have also taken aid to Cuba.
CODEPINK founder Medea Benjamin has been there twice recently.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: I went first a month ago to Havana, and then I went more recently to the eastern part of the country to Holguín. Both times was bringing humanitarian aid, food, powdered milk, and dried legumes like lentils.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: A total of 7,500 pounds worth. She says the situation outside of Havana, in eastern Cuba, is dire.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: There is less fuel available. There were very few gas-guzzling cars on the road. The buses were not running. The electricity was much more infrequent than in Havana. In fact, it was three to six hours a day that they had electricity. And what you could see really was the cascading effects. It’s hard to comprehend everything that happens when you don’t have fuel. But we’re seeing it happening in Cuba right now.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: She says people need to stand for Cuba. Because it has always suffered retaliation for trying to offer an alternative.
MEDEA BENJAMIN: Cuba was a country that tried to do something different when people are seeing that the model of vulture capitalism is really not one that is providing even the basic needs for people around the world. In the United States, where I live, it’s so difficult to even get health care. Young people can’t afford an education. We have ICE thugs on our streets that are just grabbing people and terrorizing communities here in Washington, DC. We have National Guard troops with guns walking around our streets.
So, Cuba was trying to do something different, and it managed to achieve a lot at some point in its history. This health care system that Cuba not only took care of its own people but exported health care workers around the world is a model for the world and what we should be doing, taking care of people, training people, and then sending them out to the poorest communities or communities that are hit by earthquakes and hurricanes and natural disasters.
So I think that in itself is one major reason. The other is just, you know, how much is the world going to let the big bully of Trump just trample over other countries’ sovereignty. We just saw it happen in Venezuela, which is such an unbelievably corrupt and convoluted situation right now with the US stealing its oil. What the US is still doing in the Middle East and threatening to do.
So, you know, somebody’s got to stand up to the big bully, and Cuba’s always been the one doing it. So, you know, God bless them. We should be thankful that there’s somebody standing up.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: In March, inspired by the humanitarian aid flotillas to Gaza, Medea Benjamin’s CODEPINK and Progressive International are planning to set sail from Mexico with what they are calling the “Nuestra América Flotilla” to send aid to Cuba….
Also… it might seem a little contradictory…. Someone else has been delivering aid to Cuba…
The United States.
That’s right. The country that is the most responsible for the crisis in Cuba right now is also sending humanitarian aid. $6 million worth, through the Catholic Church and a Catholic NGO. Yes, it’s hypocritical… but it’s also a strategic way of making it seem like the United States isn’t to blame.
“I’ve been traveling around the region to make sure the aid is arriving,” US ambassador to Cuba Mike Hammer said in a video posted over social media in mid-February, “to alleviate the suffering and to improve the conditions a little bit for the people.”
Cuban journalist Liz Oliva Fernández.
LIZ OLIVIA FERNÁNDEZ: We don’t want nothing from the United States. Please be quiet. Be in your own country, doing your own things. We don’t care about that. But please don’t come here to pretend that you actually want to help us, because we don’t need your help. I feel like maybe that’s contradictory and that’s just me, and lot of people say, well, we want United States’ help. But historically, I think history has shown that whatever the United States [enters into] the game to help, things end really [badly].
[THEME MUSIC]
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That is all for today.
Next time… We go to Mexico.
SPEAKER [CLIP]: They left the whole front facade here… all along the wall here is just pockmarked with these holes that are left from the gunshots and the firings by the US soldiers when they attacked.
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: To look at the US threats on the country just the other side of the Rio Grande, the long history of US intervention in the US’ closest neighbor to the south, and the impact it’s having today…
NEWS REPORT [CLIP]: Mexico on edge. Following the Mexico government operation that killed the cartel kingpin known as “El Mencho.”
MICHAEL FOX [NARRATION]: That’s next time on Under the Shadow…
I’m your host, Michael Fox.
Thanks for listening.
If you enjoyed today’s podcast, and you like this series, please do us a favor, go to your podcasting app and give us a like, a follow, a subscribe, and leave us a comment or a review. It really helps to spread the word about the show.
Also… I really want to thank everyone who took the time to speak with me for today’s episode. Peter Kornbluh, Medea Benjamin, Camila Pineiro, Greg Wilpert, and Liz Oliva Fernández.
I’m adding links to them, their organizations, and their work in the show notes.
A huge shout out to Liz and Belly of the Beast in particular. You can find more of their work at Belly of the Beast…. Either on their website or on YouTube. They are doing incredible work, and they were a huge help for this episode. As you heard, I used clips of numerous videos for this episode. Thank you so much again to both Liz and Belly of the Beast. Please check them out.
The Eisenhower document I mentioned that Peter Kornbluh found the original of, Mallory’s memo… it’s on the website of the National Security Archives. There’s so much more there about the US covert war on Cuba over the last 60 years. If you have a chance, please take a look at Peter Kornbluh’s book Back Channel to Cuba: The Hidden History of Negotiations Between Washington and Havana. It’s extremely relevant today.
As always… if you are looking for more information, news, and reporting on Trump’s onslaught, both on communities within the United States and abroad… please check out The Real News and NACLA. Both of them are publishing daily indispensable reporting.
If you are new to this podcast series, you might want to consider checking out the first season of Under the Shadow. It looks at US intervention in Central America, in particular throughout the 1980s. I highly recommend you go back and give it a listen. It’s still super relevant today. I’ll add links in the show notes, or you can find that by searching for Under the Shadow wherever you get your podcasts.
The theme music is by my band, Monte Perdido. You can find us on Spotify or wherever you stream music. This closing music playing right now is off our 2024 album, Ofrenda. I hope you check it out.
Finally, if you like what you hear, please head over to my Patreon page: patreon.com/mfox. There you can support my work, become a monthly sustainer, or sign up to stay abreast of the latest on this podcast and my other reporting across Latin America. This really helps me to continue to do this important work.
Under the Shadow is a co-production of The Real News and NACLA.
This episode script was edited by Heather Gies.
Thanks for listening. See you next time.
Cuba is facing the greatest existential threat it has seen in decades. Trash is filling streets, because garbage trucks can’t make the rounds. Rolling blackouts, rising food prices and cuts to transportation, university classes, and hospitals amid a gas shortage, the likes of which the country hasn’t seen in years.
US President Donald Trump, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and other officials have made it clear that they aren’t interested in anything less than regime change. And they’re going after that goal full throttle. The United States is now imposing an oil blockade on the island nation that is pushing it to the brink – and hitting its most vulnerable residents the hardest.
In this episode, we look at Cuba, the history of the more than 65-year-old US embargo on Cuba and Trump’s actions.
Under the Shadow is an investigative narrative podcast series that walks back in time, telling the story of the past by visiting momentous places in the present. Season 2 responds in real time to the Trump administration’s onslaught on Latin America.
Hosted by Latin America-based journalist Michael Fox.
Many thanks to Belly of the Beast for the interview with Liz Oliva Fernandez and the use of the sound from several of their videos.
Unless otherwise stated, all of the ambient sound of the ICE raids, protests and clips of people in the streets were taken from videos posted over social media or news reports. Below are links to some of them.
This podcast is produced in partnership between The Real News Network and NACLA.
Theme music by Michael Fox’s band, Monte Perdido. Monte Perdido’s 2024 album Ofrenda is available on Spotify, Deezer, Apple Music, YouTube or wherever you listen to music.
Other music from Blue Dot Sessions.
Guests:
Script editing by Heather Gies. Hosted, written, produced, mixed and edited by Michael Fox.
Resources :
Under the Shadow, Season 1:
You can check out the first season of Under the Shadow by clicking here
Michael Fox’s recent reporting on the boat strikes and the ramp-up for war in Venezuela:
Support Under the Shadow
Please consider supporting this podcast and Michael Fox’s reporting on his Patreon account: patreon.com/mfox. There you can also see exclusive pictures, video, and interviews.


This story originally appeared in Workday Magazine on Mar. 05, 2026. It is shared here with permission.
ICE Out of MN, a coalition of unions, worker centers, and community organizations, is putting pressure on Minnesota’s corporations that stayed silent as thousands of federal immigration agents wreaked havoc on the state. The coalition is focusing its efforts on Target, a “home-grown” corporation, that once proudly championed progressive causes and local philanthropy, and has since rolled those commitments back, and donated $1 million to President Trump’s 2025 inauguration.
The coalition is leading a corporate pressure campaign to urge the company to take steps to protect workers and use its political and economic capital to lobby against ICE. While ICE activity has decreased since its peak in Minnesota, detentions continue, and organizers are outraged that Target has stayed silent, even as ICE has come on its property. In January, two Target workers were violently detained while on the job at a Richfield, MN, location. The workers were both US citizens.
Target, along with over 60 CEOs and other corporate leaders in Minnesota, published a brief letter on the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce website, asking for “de-escalation” the day after the killing of Alex Pretti by federal agents in Minneapolis. Organizers from the ICE Out of MN coalition argue that the letter is insufficient and does not directly ask for the end of ICE activity in the state. Workday Magazine reached out to Target for comment and did not receive a response by the deadline.
In an interview with Workday Magazine, Veronica Mendez Moore, a long-time Minnesota labor organizer and coordinator for the coalition, discusses Target’s role as a leader in the state, why organizers are putting pressure on the company to take action, and how Minnesotans are picking up the pieces.
The following interview has been edited for length and clarity.
Workday Magazine: What is your role in the coalition that’s focusing on Target in Minnesota? And who are the other organizations and unions that are a part of this effort?
Mendez Moore: I’m the corporate campaigns coordinator for the ICE Out of MN coalition, which is a coalition of labor unions and community organizations. I was the co-founder and co-director of the Centro de Trabajadores Unidos en la Lucha (CTUL) that has led a lot of corporate campaigns engaging low-wage workers of color, primarily immigrant and Black workers, to take on corporate campaigns and find out where power lies, who can really make decisions that impact people’s lives, and then engaging those decision-makers to try to make changes for workers.
In this moment, I’m thinking about how we hold corporations accountable for their complicity in the Trump agenda, specifically in Minnesota. I’m thinking about ICE’s presence here and the need for corporations to take a stand and not profit off of people’s misery.
The coalition includes Unidos MN, CTUL, the Minneapolis Federation of Educators (MFE), St. Paul Federation of Educators (SPFE), and UNITE HERE Local 17. SEIU Local 26 and ISAIAH are also part of the corporate campaign table, but they are not part of the campaign focusing on Target.
Workday Magazine: Can you tell me a little bit more about Target’s actions ever since Trump took office?
Mendez Moore: We know that Target decided to donate 1 million dollars to Trump’s inauguration. Target placed a bet on the Trump administration, siding with them, when they made a decision to roll back their DEI commitments that they had made around partnering with Black-owned businesses.
We also saw ICE agents go into their Richfield, MN, store and violently tackle and detain two Target team members who are both teenagers and US citizens—and Target stayed completely silent. What is the message that sends to the community? What is the message that that sends to their workers—that Target isn’t going to protect them and doesn’t have a position on their own staff members being assaulted by ICE? That puts in jeopardy the safety of their team members, the people that are shopping at Target, and anyone else nearby.
The other big issue with Target is that they have been letting ICE regularly stage out of their parking lot, particularly on the Lake Street location in Minneapolis, in the heart of the Latino immigrant community. Target’s response to that has been that they can’t control who’s on their property, who’s in their parking lots, which is clearly untrue, because they make decisions all the time about who can and cannot be in their parking lots.
Target is a home-grown company that has always prided itself on supporting the community. They support schools and museums and have their names on plaques everywhere because they donate money to nonprofits, and that has been something they’ve prided themselves on. As a result, many Minnesotans were very loyal to Target. Now, with Target placing its bet on the Trump administration instead of with its own community, people are turning. The tide is turning and people are angry at Target and have expectations, because with that sort of loyalty comes expectations that are not being met.
Target signed onto a corporate letter with a bunch of other corporations calling on nobody to do nothing. There was no specific ask that ICE stop. There was nothing about protecting their staff, customers, or the general public. Minnesota expects more from Target. It is at this moment when it’s right here in Target’s backyard, the biggest immigration operation in the history of this country. Target needs to take a stand and they need to decide which side they’re on, and so far they’ve chosen to be on the side of the Trump administration.
Workday Magazine: What is the specific demand being made and what are the tactics being used right now by this coalition? We’ve seen sit-ins, boycotts, and marches. Are there other things happening behind the scenes?
Mendez Moore: So the demand is that they use their power and influence to call for ICE to leave Minnesota, and that continues to be a demand, as ICE is still in Minnesota. We’re calling on them to become a Fourth Amendment business, where they can say ICE is not allowed in their stores. Store managers at some of their stores around the country are putting plans in place with their employees and having these conversations. But Target as a corporation, and in most stores, has taken no position and done nothing to ensure the safety of their workers.
Another demand is that they use their power to lobby Congress on a national level and to make sure that not another penny goes to DHS to continue these violent escalations that we’ve been seeing. Lastly, we’re demanding that they speak up to demand justice for Renee Good and for Alex Pretti, and that any ICE agent who was involved in harassing, harming, and murdering our community members needs to be held accountable.
Workday Magazine: What kinds of actions is the coalition planning?
Mendez Moore: This has really picked up nationally because a lot of folks are following the lead of Minnesotans and recognizing that Target has a significant amount of influence and economic power. Folks have been doing sit-ins, singing demonstrations, and just in the last few weeks, there were about 55 actions across the country. In some of those actions, including two local stores, people performed civil disobedience to demonstrate that Target can kick people out. They, in fact, did kick out community members who were peacefully protesting while continuing to refuse to kick ICE out of their stores.
There also have been conversations with Target board members and investors. Investors should be very concerned right now about where Target is at financially and the fact that the DEI boycott has cost them significantly. Their complicity around ICE in Minnesota has made things go even worse for them. So investors should be concerned and conversations have been happening with investors to educate them about what these impacts could mean, locally and nationally.
Also, a letter from almost 300 Target corporate employees went to the company saying that they also are really concerned about all of these things and have the same demands. They sent that letter to Target about a month ago and Target has done nothing.
Workday Magazine: Has there been any meaningful response from Target?
Mendez Moore: They have not responded in any meaningful way to any of the ICE demands. We are also absolutely acting in solidarity with the Black grassroots leaders that launched the DEI boycott in Minnesota. We haven’t heard anything publicly.
Right now, the next steps in this campaign are to continue demanding corporate accountability. Target continues to be silent, and so Target will continue to hear from the community, both in Minnesota and around the country. Other corporate actors also need to be held accountable for what has happened here in Minnesota, and their silence and complicity, and there will be ongoing demands for corporations to speak up and to do the right thing.
Workday Magazine: What is the role for these other corporate actors either here in Minnesota or nationally?
Mendez Moore: The vision for Target remains the same: to make a public stance on all these issues and use their influence. The demands will be the same for other corporations. There are a number of corporate employees at UnitedHealth Group who have spoken up and written letters to the CEO. On January 23, there was a sit-in in the lobby of US Bank demanding that US Bank also do the same thing. The organizers got a response from US Bank to meet, but from that meeting, there have not been results, and so we need to continue to ask, “Which side are you on?”
There is no neutral here. There is a community who is making demands, and there’s a Trump administration who is trying to use corporations to do its bidding. They have a decision to make. Right now, Target is in a bit of an identity crisis with having a new CEO and having formerly made a ton of really positive commitments to the community in the wake of the murder of George Floyd and the uprisings in Minnesota. They made a lot of good commitments and are now rolling those back and continuing to go down the Trump path and it’s not going to go well for them.
Workday Magazine: Why is it important for unions and the labor movement generally to be a part of this coalition?
Mendez Moore: On a national level, the president of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, sent a letter to Target, furious, because teachers spend billions of dollars a year at Target. Especially in Minnesota, but also on a national level, that is the place that teachers go to buy their school supplies and all the stuff that they provide for students. To be ignored by Target on this issue that teachers feel really strongly about, it has made people angry.
MFE has been participating in the sit-ins at Target stores, where they got hundreds of folks there. SPFE has done that too. UNITE HERE had six of their members willing to risk arrest and ultimately detained and trespassed from the Target store, because they feel really strongly about a major corporation in our state who has so much influence and who has prided itself on standing with the community.
It’s important for labor even if they haven’t been leading campaigns on these particular corporate targets to come together because, here in Minnesota, many organizations and unions are used to advocacy work and lobbying and trying to get our legislators to take bold actions. But the truth is: Trump does not care what Tim Walz says. He does not care what Jacob Frey says. What is going to impact his agenda is what corporations think, and we saw that in California when agriculture corporate leaders reached out to him about the targeted enforcement there. That’s who he cares about.
We need to call on these corporations who stand with us and to create distance between themselves and Trump. Yes, let’s do the legislative things that we can do. But there’s a real limit on what we’re going to be able to do and how we’re going to be able to get our electeds to speak out and do anything meaningful. There’s not that much in this moment that elected officials can do to stop Trump and his agenda. It’s the corporations who can—and we need to be moving them in every state across the country. When ICE shows up to do a surge, we’re going to need to continue to hold corporations accountable and have unions and community organizations on the ground in those cities, hammering the corporate targets, in order to make any significant dent in the Trump coalition.
Cruzamento de dados compara consumo e renda declarada; não há anúncio oficial de nova medida.
Leia mais em https://www.contabeis.com.br/noticias/75043/gastos-no-cartao-entram-no-radar-da-rfb/