Blog

With the semifinals between France and Spain and between Argentina and England, and the World Cup final scheduled for the weekend, the United States strengthened the security measures at the tournament venues. The scheme, which involves federal, state and local forces, was discussed on Infobae al Mediodía with expert Andrei Serbin Pont, who explained how an architecture designed to minimize risks both inside and outside the stadiums works.

Using the operation implemented in Kansas during the recent matches there as an example, Serbin Pont said the deployment reflects the same approach used at all venues. “The security deployment will have at least 1,600 officers assigned to the area,” he explained, adding that the goal is not only to protect the stadiums but also hotels, delegations, fan fests and other places where spectators gather.

A security architecture that goes far beyond the stadiums

According to the specialist, the operation begins well before entry to the field. “Hotels have a perimeter area to protect them from any drone activity in the area. A drone is not necessarily a lethal threat, but it is a matter of privacy, protection and operational security,” he said.

That plan also includes guarded convoys for team transfers and screens installed to obstruct the view of areas where squads are staying. “The United States will deploy those perimeters around the hotels and protect them using different mechanisms, including screens intended to obscure visibility of the areas where the two teams are located,” he explained.

Serbin Pont also noted that one of the main investments for the World Cup has been the addition of anti-drone systems and emphasized that the security apparatus extends well beyond the stadium perimeter. “This does not only apply around the hotel or the stadium. It also applies to the fan fests, which have designated drone perimeters and their own security setup with rapid response forces,” he said.

More than 400 agencies coordinated and readiness for any scenario

The analyst highlighted that the scale of the operation lies in coordination among agencies with very different roles. “There are 400 agencies in total coordinating. That is why we are talking about an investment of approximately one billion dollars,” he said.

The plan integrates local and state police with federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and specialized units from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He explained that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) tactical teams were brought in to expand response capacity for highly complex situations.

“They need to have the greatest possible number of resources and personnel available in case of an emergency,” he said. Among the scenarios considered is the possibility of an active shooter, a type of attack he said “has probably been one of the situations that worried them most during this World Cup.” In that hypothesis, he added, “the idea is to have multiple rapid-response groups that can react immediately.”

Snipers, deterrence and constant surveillance

The security arrangement also includes snipers positioned strategically in the stadiums, a common practice at major sporting events in the United States.

“Sniper nests are already customary. Most stadiums have a designated space so they can monitor everything that happens in the stands and on the pitch,” Serbin Pont explained. He detailed that these teams operate in pairs made up of a shooter and an observer, while others remain concealed to broaden surveillance capability.

He offered a remark that sums up the logic of the deployment: “The sniper they find is often the one they want people to think they found.” For the specialist, the visible part of the deployment also serves as a preventive measure. “In these situations, presence contributes to deterrence,” he said, explaining why most personnel work fully identified.

The challenge of controlling mixed fan groups and preventing incidents

Beyond extraordinary threats, Serbin Pont warned that one of the main challenges is the coexistence of supporters of different teams within the same stadium. Unlike other countries, the United States does not have strict physical separation between rival fan sections.

“You can have several hot spots and they are hard to control precisely because they are separate. You don’t need a generalized group of violent people: a few individuals are enough to create tense situations,” he explained.

In his view, the increase in the number of officers also responds to that reality. “The increase in personnel allocated to event security, I think, is intended to ensure there are enough human resources to handle a tense situation or something larger,” he added.

During the program, journalist Flavia Pittella also described the level of control observed in the stands. She said that in each section there was security staff continuously supervising spectators’ behavior and that any flag was inspected before being allowed in. In that context, Serbin Pont confirmed that the ban on flags referencing the Falkland Islands was reinforced for the Argentina vs. England match and recalled that the measure had been ratified by the Minister of Security.

A system designed to minimize the margin for error

Although he acknowledged that the main alerts related to possible terrorist attacks have decreased as the tournament has progressed, Serbin Pont said U.S. authorities are maintaining the same level of preparedness because the objective is to minimize any possibility of an incident.

“I don’t think we are in an alert situation. But when you host an event like this you want to make sure from every angle that there is no margin for error,” he said. For that reason, he explained, during the decisive matches it is expected to see a greater police presence, private security personnel and tactical units deployed around the stadiums and fan areas.

The specialist also recalled that the preventive plan began even before the competition started. “The list of 33,000 people who would not be allowed to enter any of the stadiums was known before the World Cup began,” he said. For Serbin Pont, that prior planning, together with coordination among hundreds of agencies and intensive use of technology, explains why the United States put in place one of the most ambitious protection operations ever seen at a World Cup.

–

Infobae accompanies you every day on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most relevant news in a close, dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé rotate during the week.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich rotate during the week.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

With semifinals between France and Spain and Argentina and England, and the World Cup final set for the weekend, the United States strengthened the security deployed at the tournament venues. The arrangement, involving federal, state and local forces, was discussed on Infobae al Mediodía by specialist Andrei Serbin Pont, who described how an architecture is designed to minimize risks inside and outside the stadiums.

Using the operation implemented in Kansas during recent matches there as an example, Serbin Pont said the deployment reflects the logic applied at all venues. “The security operation will have at least 1,600 agents positioned in the area,” he explained, adding that the aim is not only to guard the stadiums but also to protect hotels, delegations, fan fests and other public gathering points.

A security architecture that goes far beyond the stadiums

According to the specialist, the operation begins well before fans enter the stadium. “Hotels have a perimeter area to protect them from any drone activity nearby. A drone is not necessarily a lethal threat, but it raises issues of privacy, protection and operational security,” he said.

The plan also includes escorted convoys for team transfers and screens installed to obstruct views of the areas where squads are located. “The United States will deploy perimeters around hotels and protect them with various measures, including screens that try to obscure visibility of the areas where the two teams are stationed,” he explained.

Serbin Pont also noted that one of the main investments for the World Cup was the incorporation of anti-drone systems and stressed that the operation extends well beyond the stadium perimeter. “This applies not only around hotels or stadiums. It also applies to fan fests, which have designated drone perimeters and their own security arrangements with rapid reaction forces,” he said.

More than 400 agencies coordinated and a response prepared for any scenario

The analyst emphasized that the scale of the operation lies in coordination among agencies with very different functions. “There are 400 agencies in total coordinating. That is why we are talking about an investment of approximately one billion dollars,” he said.

The plan brings together local and state police with federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and specialized units from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He explained that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) tactical groups were added to increase capacity to respond to highly complex situations.

“They need to have as many resources and personnel available as possible in case of an emergency,” he said. Among the scenarios considered is the possibility of an active shooter, which he noted “is probably one of the situations that has caused the most concern during this World Cup.” To address that hypothesis, he added, “the idea is to have multiple rapid-response teams that can react immediately.”

Snipers, deterrence and constant surveillance

The security arrangement also includes snipers positioned strategically around stadiums, a common practice at major sporting events in the United States.

“Sniper nests are already standard. Most stadiums have designated spaces so they can monitor the stands and the field,” Serbin Pont explained. He said these teams operate in pairs—shooter and spotter—while others remain concealed to expand surveillance capability.

He also offered a remark that summarizes the operation’s logic: “The sniper they find is often the one they want you to think you find.” For the specialist, visible elements of the deployment serve a preventative purpose. “In this kind of situation, presence contributes to deterrence,” he said, noting that most personnel work clearly identified for that reason.

The challenge of managing mixed crowds and preventing incidents

Beyond extraordinary threats, Serbin Pont warned that a key challenge is the coexistence of supporters of different teams within the same stadium. Unlike in some other countries, in the United States there is no strict physical separation between rival fan sections.

“You can have several hotspots and they are hard to control precisely because they are multiple. You don’t need a large group of violent people: a few individuals can create tense situations,” he explained.

He said the increase in the number of agents also responds to that reality. “The rise in personnel assigned to event security, I think, seeks to ensure enough human resources to handle a tense incident or something larger,” he added.

During the program, journalist Flavia Pittella also described the level of control observed in the stands. She said security staff monitored spectator behavior in each section and that any flag was inspected before being allowed in. In that context, Serbin Pont confirmed that the ban on flags referencing the Falkland Islands was reinforced for the Argentina–England match and recalled that the measure had been ratified by the Minister of Security.

An operation designed to minimize the margin of error

Although he acknowledged that the main alerts linked to potential terrorist attacks have declined as the tournament progressed, Serbin Pont said U.S. authorities are maintaining the same level of readiness because the goal is to minimize any possibility of an incident.

“I don’t think we’re in a state of heightened alert. But when you host an event like this you want to make sure from every angle that there is no margin for error,” he said. For that reason, he explained, during decisive matches it is reasonable to expect a greater police presence, private security personnel and tactical units deployed around stadiums and fan areas.

The specialist also recalled that the preventive plan began even before the competition started. “Before the World Cup began there was already a list of 33,000 people who would not be allowed into any of the stadiums,” he said. For Serbin Pont, that prior planning, combined with the coordination of hundreds of agencies and intensive use of technology, explains why the United States has mounted one of the most ambitious protection operations ever organized for a World Cup.

—

Infobae accompanies you daily on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most relevant information in a close and dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae at Dawn: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae at Nine: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae at Midday: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae in the Afternoon: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; rotating during the week: Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae at Return: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; rotating during the week: Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

(more…)

With semifinals between France and Spain and Argentina and England, and the World Cup final scheduled for the weekend, the United States strengthened the security deployment at the tournament venues. The scheme, involving federal, state and local forces, was examined on Infobae al Mediodía by specialist Andrei Serbin Pont, who explained how an architecture designed to minimize any risk inside and outside the stadiums works.

Using the operation implemented in Kansas during the last matches held there as an example, Serbin Pont said the deployment reflects the logic maintained at all venues. “The security deployment will have at least 1,600 officers positioned in the area,” he explained, and clarified that the goal is not only to guard the stadiums but also to protect hotels, delegations, fan fests and other public gathering points.

A security architecture that goes far beyond the stadiums

According to the specialist, the operation begins long before entry to the pitch. “Hotels have a perimeter area to protect them from any drone activity in the zone. A drone is not necessarily a lethal threat to someone, but it is also a matter of privacy, protection and operational security,” he noted.

Escorted convoys are added to that scheme for team transfers and screens are installed to make it harder to see the areas where the squads remain. “The United States will be deploying those perimeters around hotels and securing them with different mechanisms, even screens that try to obscure visibility of the areas where the two teams are kept,” he explained.

Serbin Pont also recalled that one of the main investments made for the World Cup was the incorporation of anti-drone systems and emphasized that the deployment goes well beyond the stadium perimeter. “This not only applies around the hotel or the pitch. It also applies to the fan fests, which have their own designated drone perimeter and a device with rapid reaction forces,” he said.

More than 400 agencies coordinated and a response prepared for any scenario

The analyst highlighted that the magnitude of the operation lies in the coordination among agencies with very different functions. “There are 400 agencies in total coordinating. That is why we are talking about an investment of approximately one billion dollars,” he said.

The scheme integrates local and state police with federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and specialized units of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Regarding the latter, he explained that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) tactical groups were incorporated to broaden the response capacity for high-complexity situations.

“What they need is to have the greatest number of resources and personnel available in case of an emergency,” he said. Among the scenarios contemplated is the possibility of an active shooter, a type of attack that, he indicated, “is probably one of the situations that has worried the most during this World Cup.” Faced with that hypothesis, he added, “the idea is to have multiple rapid response groups that can react immediately.”

Snipers, deterrence and constant surveillance

The deployment also includes snipers positioned in strategic locations within the stadiums, a common practice at major sporting events held in the United States.

“Sniper nests are already customary. Most stadiums have a designated space so they can monitor everything happening in the stands and on the pitch,” Serbin Pont explained. He detailed that these teams operate in pairs composed of a shooter and an observer, while others remain hidden to expand surveillance capacity.

He even offered a remark that summarizes the logic of the deployment: “The sniper they find is usually the one they want you to think they found.” For the specialist, the visibility of part of the deployment also serves a preventive function. “In these types of situations, presence contributes to deterrence,” he said, explaining why most officers work fully identified.

The challenge of controlling mixed crowds and preventing incidents

Beyond extraordinary threats, Serbin Pont warned that one of the main challenges is coexistence among supporters of different teams within the same stadium. Unlike in other countries, the United States does not have strict physical separation between rival fan sections.

“You can have multiple hotspots and it is difficult to control precisely because they are pockets. You do not need a generalized group of violent people: it is enough for some individuals to create tense situations,” he explained.

In his view, the increase in the number of officers also responds to that reality. “The rise in agents assigned to event security, I think, is aimed at having sufficient human resources to handle a tense situation or something larger,” he added.

During the program, journalist Flavia Pittella also described the level of control observed in the stands. She said that each section had security staff continuously supervising public behavior and that any flag was inspected before being allowed inside. In that context, Serbin Pont confirmed that for the Argentina vs England match the ban on bringing flags referencing the Falkland Islands was reinforced and recalled that the measure had been ratified by the Minister of Security.

A system designed to minimize the margin of error

Although he acknowledged that the main alerts related to possible terrorist attacks decreased as the tournament progressed, Serbin Pont said U.S. authorities maintain the same level of preparedness because the goal is to minimize any possibility of incident.

“I do not believe we are in an alert situation. But when you host an event like this you want to make sure from every angle that there is no margin for error,” he said. For that reason, he explained, during the decisive matches it is to be expected that there will be a greater police presence, private security personnel and tactical units deployed in the surroundings of the stadiums and in fan areas.

The specialist also recalled that the preventive scheme began even before the competition started. “It was already known before the World Cup began the list of 33,000 people who would not be allowed into any of the stadiums,” he said. For Serbin Pont, that prior planning, combined with the coordination among hundreds of agencies and intensive use of technology, explains why the United States mounted one of the most ambitious protection deployments ever accompanying a World Cup.

–

Infobae accompanies you every day on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most important information, presented in a close and dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; alternating during the week Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; alternating during the week Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

(more…)

With the semifinals between France and Spain and Argentina and England, and the final scheduled for the weekend, the United States has strengthened the security deployed at tournament venues. The operation, which involves federal, state and local forces, was discussed on Infobae al Mediodía with specialist Andrei Serbin Pont, who described how an architecture designed to minimize risks functions both inside and outside the stadiums.

Using the operation implemented in Kansas during recent matches as an example, Serbin Pont said the deployment reflects the approach used at all venues. “The security operation will have at least 1,600 officers assigned to the area,” he explained, and added that the goal is not only to guard stadiums but also to protect hotels, delegations, fan fests and other public gathering points.

A security architecture that extends well beyond the stadiums

According to the specialist, the operation begins long before entry to the stadium. “Hotels have perimeter zones to protect them from any drone activity in the area. A drone is not necessarily a lethal threat, but it is a matter of privacy, protection and operational security,” he noted.

The plan also includes guarded convoys for team transfers and screens installed to limit visibility of areas where squads are located. “The United States is deploying perimeters around hotels and protecting them with different mechanisms, including screens that try to obscure the view of the areas where the teams stay,” he explained.

Serbin Pont also recalled that one of the main investments for the World Cup was the addition of anti-drone systems and stressed that the operation goes well beyond the stadium perimeter. “This applies not only around hotels or the stadium. It also applies to fan fests, which have drone-designated perimeters and their own response units with rapid reaction forces,” he said.

More than 400 agencies coordinated and a response prepared for any scenario

The analyst emphasized that the scale of the operation lies in coordination between agencies with very different roles. “There are 400 agencies in total coordinating. That is why we are talking about an investment of approximately one billion dollars,” he said.

The plan combines local and state police with federal agencies such as the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and specialized units of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He explained that Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) tactical teams were included to expand response capacity for complex incidents.

“They need to have the greatest number of means and personnel available in case of an emergency,” he said. Among the scenarios planned for is an active shooter, which he noted “is probably one of the situations that has caused the most concern during this World Cup.” To address that possibility, he added, “the idea is to have multiple rapid response teams that can react immediately.”

Snipers, deterrence and continuous surveillance

The operation also includes snipers positioned strategically in stadiums, a common practice at major sporting events in the United States.

“Sniper nests are already standard. Most stadiums have designated spaces so they can monitor what happens in the stands and on the field,” Serbin Pont explained. He detailed that these teams operate in pairs made up of a shooter and an observer, while others remain concealed to expand surveillance capability.

He also offered a remark that summarizes the operation’s logic: “The sniper you find is usually the one they want you to think you found.” For the specialist, making part of the deployment visible also serves a preventive function. “In situations like this, presence helps with deterrence,” he said, explaining why most personnel work fully identified.

The challenge of managing mixed crowds and preventing incidents

Beyond extraordinary threats, Serbin Pont warned that one of the main challenges is the coexistence of fans from different teams in the same stadium. Unlike in some other countries, the United States does not enforce a strict physical separation between rival supporters.

“You can have several hot spots and they are hard to control precisely because they are multiple. You don’t need a generalized group of violent people: it is enough for a few individuals to create tense situations,” he explained.

He believes the increase in personnel also responds to that reality. “The rise in agents assigned to event security is intended to ensure there are enough human resources to handle a tense situation or something larger,” he added.

During the program, journalist Flavia Pittella also described the level of control observed in the stands. She said security staff monitored crowd behavior in each section and that any flags were inspected before being allowed in. In that context, Serbin Pont confirmed that for the Argentina vs England match the ban on flags referencing the Falkland Islands was reinforced, and he recalled that the measure had been confirmed by the Minister of Security.

A system designed to minimize the margin of error

Although he acknowledged that top alerts related to potential terrorist attacks have decreased as the tournament has progressed, Serbin Pont said U.S. authorities are maintaining the same level of readiness because the goal is to minimize any possibility of an incident.

“I don’t think we are in a state of alert. But when you host an event like this you want to be sure from every angle that there is no margin of error,” he said. For that reason, he explained, during decisive matches it is to be expected that there will be a greater presence of police, private security personnel and tactical units near stadiums and fan areas.

The specialist also recalled that preventive measures began even before the competition started. “It was already known before the World Cup began that a list of 33,000 people would not be allowed into any of the stadiums,” he said. For Serbin Pont, that prior planning, combined with coordination among hundreds of agencies and intensive use of technology, explains why the United States has put in place one of the most ambitious protection operations ever deployed for a World Cup.

–

Infobae accompanies you every day on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most relevant information in a close and dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; rotating during the week: Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; rotating during the week: Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

(more…)

Con las semifinales entre Francia y España y entre Argentina e Inglaterra, y con la final programada para el fin de semana, Estados Unidos reforzó la seguridad en las sedes del Mundial 2026. El dispositivo combina fuerzas federales, estatales y locales; el especialista Andrei Serbin Pont explicó en Infobae al Mediodía cómo está organizado para reducir riesgos dentro y fuera de los estadios.

Tomando como referencia el operativo montado en Kansas en los últimos partidos, Serbin Pont señaló que el despliegue en cada sede sigue una lógica similar: “Habrá al menos 1.600 agentes en la zona”, dijo, y aclaró que la protección abarca no solo los recintos deportivos, sino también hoteles, delegaciones, fan fests y otros puntos con concentración de público.

Una arquitectura de seguridad que va mucho más allá de los estadios

El operativo se activa con anticipación al acceso a las canchas. Los hoteles cuentan con perímetros para evitar la presencia de drones por motivos de seguridad, privacidad y operación. También se organizan convoyes custodiados para el traslado de las selecciones y se instalan pantallas para dificultar la visibilidad de las zonas donde se alojan los planteles.

Otra inversión clave fue la incorporación de sistemas antidrones; estas medidas se aplican no solo alrededor de hoteles y estadios sino también en los fan fests, que disponen de perímetros propios para drones y equipos de reacción rápida.

Más de 400 organismos coordinados y una respuesta preparada para cualquier escenario

La escala del operativo responde a la coordinación entre más de 400 agencias y a una inversión cercana a los mil millones de dólares, según el analista. El esquema integra policías locales y estatales con organismos federales como el FBI, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (Homeland Security) y unidades especializadas de ICE, incluidas las agrupaciones tácticas de Investigaciones de Seguridad Nacional (HSI) para incidentes complejos.

El plan contempla múltiples escenarios, entre ellos el de un tirador activo, por lo que se dispuso la presencia de varios equipos de respuesta rápida y una dotación amplia de medios y personal para actuar de inmediato ante emergencias.

Francotiradores, disuasión y vigilancia permanente

Como en otros grandes eventos en Estados Unidos, el dispositivo incluye francotiradores ubicados en posiciones estratégicas dentro de los estadios. Operan en binomios (tirador y observador), y parte del despliegue es visible como elemento disuasorio. Según Serbin Pont, la visibilidad intencionada de ciertos recursos contribuye a la prevención: “La presencia contribuye a la disuasión”.

Los equipos pueden combinar posiciones expuestas y otras ocultas para ampliar la vigilancia y capacidad de intervención.

El desafío de controlar hinchadas mezcladas y prevenir incidentes

Otro reto es la convivencia de hinchadas de distintas selecciones en un mismo estadio: en Estados Unidos no existe una separación física tan estricta entre parcialidades como en otros países, lo que exige mayor presencia de personal para controlar focos puntuales de tensión. No es necesaria una violencia generalizada: basta con que algunos individuos provoquen incidentes para que la situación escale.

Por eso se aumentó la cantidad de agentes disponibles, para disponer de suficiente recurso humano ante situaciones tensas o de mayor envergadura. En las tribunas hay seguridad permanente que supervisa el comportamiento del público y revisa banderas antes de permitir su ingreso; para el partido Argentina–Inglaterra, se reforzó la prohibición de banderas con referencias a las Islas Malvinas, una medida ratificada por la ministra de Seguridad.

Un dispositivo pensado para reducir al mínimo el margen de error

Aunque las alertas relacionadas con atentados terroristas se han reducido durante el torneo, las autoridades mantienen el nivel de preparación para minimizar cualquier posibilidad de incidente. En los partidos decisivos es habitual encontrar mayor presencia policial, seguridad privada y unidades tácticas en las inmediaciones de los estadios y zonas de fanáticos.

El plan preventivo empezó antes del inicio de la competencia: ya se había confeccionado con antelación una lista de personas vetadas (33.000) para que no pudieran entrar a los recintos. Esa planificación previa, la coordinación entre cientos de organismos y el uso intensivo de tecnología explican por qué Estados Unidos desplegó uno de los dispositivos de protección más amplios en la historia de una Copa del Mundo.

–

Infobae te acompaña cada día en YouTube con entrevistas, análisis y la información más destacada, en un formato cercano y dinámico.

• De 7 a 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska y Belén Escobar.

• De 9 a 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart y Cecilia Boufflet.

• De 12 a 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol y Facundo Kablan.

• De 15 a 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky y Paula Guardia Bourdin; rotan en la semana Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo y Tomás Trapé.

• De 18 a 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos y Matías Barbería; rotan en la semana Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz y Mica Mendelevich

Seguinos en nuestro canal de YouTube @infobae.

(more…)

La unidad antiterrorista de la policía británica informó este martes que el homicidio de la exdiputada conservadora Ann Widdecombe se considera un ataque selectivo. Un hombre de 28 años fue detenido como sospechoso en una investigación que ha conmocionado al Reino Unido.

El cadáver de Widdecombe fue encontrado el jueves en su residencia de Haytor, en el condado de Devon, después de que allegados notaran su ausencia en una entrevista televisiva programada para el día anterior. La mujer, de 78 años, presentaba lesiones graves cuando la policía llegó al domicilio, lo que motivó la apertura de una investigación por homicidio.

El primer arresto se produjo el sábado en South Yorkshire, en el norte de Inglaterra, a más de 300 kilómetros del lugar del hallazgo. El detenido, descrito como ciudadano británico de 28 años, fue inicialmente identificado por cargos de asesinato; a medida que avanzaron las pesquisas y aparecieron nuevos indicios, la policía lo vinculó además a delitos relacionados con el terrorismo, por lo que intervino la unidad antiterrorista.

Las autoridades confirmaron que el ataque contra la exparlamentaria fue deliberado, aunque todavía no han determinado la motivación ni han divulgado el arma empleada. Laurence Taylor, jefe de la unidad antiterrorista, señaló que se trabajan varias líneas de investigación y que el caso sigue abierto. Entre las hipótesis que se investigan figura la posibilidad de que el sospechoso hubiera planeado agredir también a otros miembros de Reform UK, partido del que Widdecombe formaba parte y en el que ejercía como portavoz.

Con más de dos décadas en la Cámara de los Comunes, Ann Widdecombe fue una figura destacada del Partido Conservador, donde llegó a ser ministra de Prisiones en el gabinete de John Major. Tras dejar el Partido Conservador se sumó al Brexit Party, fue eurodiputada y luego se convirtió en una referencia de Reform UK.

Su defensa del Brexit y sus posturas conservadoras en debates públicos la mantuvieron en el centro del debate político británico. También alcanzó mayor visibilidad por su participación en programas televisivos como Strictly Come Dancing y Celebrity Big Brother.

El crimen generó amplia conmoción entre políticos y la sociedad británica, que recordó casos previos de violencia contra representantes públicos, como los asesinatos de la diputada laborista Jo Cox en 2016 y del parlamentario conservador David Amess en 2021, ambos catalogados también como ataques selectivos con motivaciones ideológicas y que motivaron reforzar la seguridad de funcionarios y legisladores.

Aunque las autoridades han mantenido discreción, la policía confirmó que la investigación sobre la muerte de Ann Widdecombe continúa de forma activa y que se comunicarán avances cuando existan pruebas concluyentes. La identidad del sospechoso no se ha divulgado públicamente porque aún no se han presentado cargos formales definitivos; los investigadores siguen evaluando si el crimen tuvo un móvil político y si existe riesgo para otros integrantes de Reform UK.

(Con información de AFP y AP)

(more…)

The British police counter-terrorism unit announced on Tuesday that the killing of former Conservative MP Ann Widdecombe was a targeted attack. A 28-year-old man has been detained as a terrorism suspect in an investigation that has shaken the United Kingdom.

Widdecombe’s body was found on Thursday at her home in Haytor, Devon, after relatives noticed she had missed a scheduled television interview the day before. The 78-year-old former politician had suffered serious injuries by the time officers arrived at the property, prompting a homicide investigation.

The first arrest took place on Saturday in South Yorkshire, more than 300 kilometers north of the scene of the crime. The suspect, described as a white British man, was initially detained on suspicion of murder. As the investigation progressed and new evidence emerged, police also linked him to terrorism-related offences, prompting the involvement of the counter-terrorism unit.

Authorities confirmed that Widdecombe was the victim of a deliberate attack, but they have not yet determined the motive or disclosed the weapon used. Laurence Taylor, head of the counter-terrorism unit, said investigators are pursuing multiple lines of inquiry and that the case remains open. Detectives are considering the possibility that the suspect may have planned attacks on other members of Reform UK, the anti-immigration party Widdecombe belonged to and for which she served as a spokesperson.

With a political career spanning more than two decades in the House of Commons, Ann Widdecombe was a prominent figure within the Conservative Party, serving as prisons minister in John Major’s cabinet. After leaving the Conservatives, she joined the Brexit Party and was elected to the European Parliament before becoming a leading figure in Reform UK.

Her support for Brexit and her participation in social debates, where she defended conservative positions, kept her at the center of British political discussion for years. Her public profile was further increased by appearances on television shows such as Strictly Come Dancing and Celebrity Big Brother.

The crime prompted widespread shock among political figures and the public, who recalled recent violent attacks on public officials. The murders of Labour MP Jo Cox in 2016 and Conservative MP David Amess in 2021 were also treated as targeted, ideologically motivated attacks and led to strengthened security measures for officials and legislators across the country.

Despite official secrecy, police said the investigation into Ann Widdecombe’s death remains active and that any significant developments will be announced when conclusive evidence emerges. The suspect’s identity has not been released because no formal charges had been filed at the time. Investigators are examining whether the killing was politically motivated and whether other Reform UK figures could be at risk.

(With information from AFP and AP)

(more…)

Ukraine is engaged in a war with Russia that shows no signs of ending. In this context, the Ukrainian government has chosen to strengthen its defense industry by promoting domestic development of missiles and military systems. It does so through technology transfer agreements with European countries and the United States, which aim not only to assist Ukraine but also to expand global production capacity given the high demand for weaponry.

Through initiatives such as manufacturing Flamingo 5 missiles and developing ballistic models like the FP7 and FP7-X, Ukraine has made progress toward greater military self-sufficiency. Domestic companies, such as Firepoint, lead innovation by adapting imported technologies and meeting the Ukrainian state’s needs for defense and strikes on Russian territory. The process includes producing key components, like AL25 engines, which enable local assembly and cost reductions.

The conflict, far from being resolved, has produced a static front where both sides hold positions with few significant territorial changes. The prolonged fighting has pushed Ukraine to seek new strategies to sustain its defensive capabilities and to impact the Russian economy.

Military technology and license transfers

Agreements with Western countries have been essential for Ukraine’s progress. The United States and European nations have agreed to transfer production licenses for defense systems such as Patriot and SCALP missiles, as well as guided bombs and interceptor technology.

The war in Ukraine highlights a global shortfall in weapons production capacity. The United States produces 600 interceptor missiles per year, a figure far below the roughly three thousand that Ukraine needs for its air defense.

The use of expensive systems like the Patriot, which can cost up to four million dollars per unit, forces the search for more affordable alternatives. The Ukrainian FP7-X promises to intercept ballistic missiles for about one million dollars, according to Andrei Serbin Pont on Infobae Al Mediodía.

European and North American countries have an interest in Ukraine expanding its industrial capacity, not only for strategic reasons but also for economic ones. “We want to see some of the returns, and that means we are interested in these products eventually reaching our own arsenals,” Serbin Pont said regarding the European position.

At the same time, development and technology transfer are presented as a solution to sustain international demand, which exceeds Western production capacity. Western allies seek to share the burden of production and ensure supply to their armed forces without depleting their own stocks.

Impact of the conflict on Ukraine and Russia

Military operations in Ukraine have been marked by precision strikes against Russian infrastructure. Over the past year, 43% of Russia’s oil refining capacity has been affected by Ukrainian actions. Serbin Pont noted that strikes on these types of targets have exceeded two hundred, a strategy intended to harm the Russian economy and raise the domestic cost of the war.

Despite these actions, the conflict remains without a nearby resolution. “None of the large population centers they would like to recapture are close to being retaken,” Serbin Pont said. The front remains static and the prospect of a political settlement appears distant.

Political outlook and existential dimension

The conflict has an existential character for Ukraine. Serbin Pont explained that “for Ukrainians it is an existential war.” The Russian government’s position, grounded in historical and strategic arguments, denies Ukraine’s legitimacy as an independent state. President Vladimir Putin has argued, in statements before the invasion, that Ukraine should never have become independent.

For Russia, control over Ukraine is a strategic issue related to access to Crimea, the Black Sea, and the maintenance of regional influence. The conflict reflects historical and geopolitical interests, which reduces the incentives for a cessation of hostilities.

The prolongation of the war affects domestic politics in both countries. Ukraine has suspended electoral processes, and Russia uses the conflict as a tool for internal legitimization. International dynamics are altered by high demand for armaments and the continuous involvement of foreign powers in supplying technology and equipment.

–

Infobae accompanies you every day on YouTube with interviews, analysis, and the most important information, in a close and dynamic format.

• 7–9 AM: Infobae at Dawn — Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• 9 AM–12 PM: Infobae at Nine — Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• 12–3 PM: Infobae at Midday — Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• 3–6 PM: Infobae in the Afternoon — Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; during the week Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé rotate.

• 6–9 PM: Infobae on Return — Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; during the week Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich rotate.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

(more…)

Ukraine is engaged in a war with Russia that shows no signs of ending. In this context, the Ukrainian government has decided to reinforce its defense industry by focusing on local development of missiles and military systems. This effort relies on technology transfer agreements with European countries and the United States, intended not only to assist Ukraine but also to expand global production capacity amid high demand for weaponry.

Through initiatives such as manufacturing the Flamingo 5 missiles and developing ballistic models like the FP7 and FP7-X, Ukraine has made progress toward military self-sufficiency. Domestic companies, including Firepoint, have led innovation by adapting imported technologies and meeting the Ukrainian state’s needs for defense and operations against Russian territory. The process includes producing key components, such as AL25 engines, enabling local assembly and cost reductions.

The conflict, far from being resolved, has produced a largely static front where both sides hold positions with few significant territorial changes. The prolonged fighting has pushed Ukraine to seek new strategies to sustain its defense capabilities and to undermine the Russian economy.

Tecnología militar y transferencia de licencias

Agreements with Western countries have been fundamental to Ukraine’s progress. The United States and European nations have decided to transfer production licenses for defense systems such as Patriot and SCALP missiles, as well as for guided bombs and interceptor technology.

The war in Ukraine has exposed a global shortfall in weapons production capacity. The United States manufactures about 600 interceptor missiles per year, a figure far below the roughly 3,000 Ukraine would need for its air defense.

The use of expensive systems like the Patriot, which can cost up to four million dollars per unit, forces the search for more affordable alternatives. Ukraine’s FP7-X claims to be able to intercept ballistic missiles for about one million dollars, according to Andrei Serbin Pont on Infobae Al Mediodía.

European and North American countries are interested in expanding Ukraine’s industrial capacity not only for strategic reasons but also for economic ones. “We want to see some return on the investment, and that means we are interested in these products possibly entering our own arsenals in the future,” Serbin Pont said regarding the European stance.

At the same time, technology development and transfer are presented as a way to meet international demand that exceeds Western production capacity. Western allies aim to share the burden of production and secure supplies for their armed forces without depleting their own stocks.

Impact of the conflict on Ukraine and Russia

Military operations in Ukraine have been characterized by precision strikes against Russian infrastructure. Over the past year, about 43% of Russia’s oil refining capacity was affected by Ukrainian actions. Serbin Pont noted that such strikes exceed two hundred incidents targeting this type of infrastructure, a strategy intended to damage the Russian economy and raise the domestic cost of the war.

Despite these operations, the conflict remains without a near-term resolution. “None of the major population centers they would like to recapture are close to being recaptured,” Serbin Pont said. The front remains largely static, and a political settlement appears distant.

Political outlook and existential dimension

The conflict has an existential dimension for Ukraine. Serbin Pont explained that “for Ukrainians it is an existential war.” The Russian government’s position, grounded in historical and strategic arguments, rejects the legitimacy of Ukraine as an independent state. President Vladimir Putin has argued in speeches prior to the invasion that Ukraine should never have become independent.

For Russia, control over Ukraine is a strategic issue linked to access to Crimea, the Black Sea, and maintaining regional influence. The conflict is driven by historical and geopolitical interests, which reduces the incentives for a cessation of hostilities.

The prolongation of the war affects domestic politics in both countries. Ukraine has suspended electoral processes, while Russia uses the conflict as a tool for internal legitimation. The international dynamic is also altered by the high demand for armaments and by the ongoing intervention of foreign powers in supplying technology and equipment.

–

Infobae accompanies you daily on YouTube with interviews, analysis and the most relevant information, presented in a direct and dynamic format.

• From 7 to 9: Infobae al Amanecer: Nacho Giron, Luciana Rubinska and Belén Escobar.

• From 9 to 12: Infobae a las Nueve: Gonzalo Sánchez, Tatiana Schapiro, Ramón Indart and Cecilia Boufflet.

• From 12 to 15: Infobae al Mediodia: Maru Duffard, Andrei Serbin Pont, Jimena Grandinetti, Fede Mayol and Facundo Kablan.

• From 15 to 18: Infobae a la Tarde: Manu Jove, Maia Jastreblansky and Paula Guardia Bourdin; during the week Marcos Shaw, Lara López Calvo and Tomás Trapé rotate.

• From 18 to 21: Infobae al Regreso: Gonzalo Aziz, Diego Iglesias, Malena de los Ríos and Matías Barbería; during the week Gustavo Lazzari, Martín Tetaz and Mica Mendelevich rotate.

Follow us on our YouTube channel @infobae.

(more…)

Dangerous encounters with wild animals in parks and nature reserves can occur anywhere in the world, although most visitors do not experience serious incidents. Several specialists and park officials interviewed by National Geographic agree that being informed and cautious can help prevent attacks by wildlife.

Kathy Kupper, a spokesperson for the U.S. National Park Service, warns that injuries do not come only from large animals: small mammals can also bite or attack when disturbed or fed, and no animal should be harassed or given food by visitors.

Between 2018 and 2023 there were 1,604 deaths related to encounters with animals, often caused by domestic or venomous species. Although these incidents are rare compared with the total number of people who visit natural areas, experts emphasize that the risk never completely disappears.

Maintaining an appropriate distance and observing animal behavior are key. Rolf Olson, a manager at a U.S. national reserve, recommends researching which species inhabit an area and how they typically react to people before entering a natural site.

Experts insist that if an animal reacts to a person’s presence it means its space has been invaded and the likelihood of aggressive behavior increases, both in predators and in large herbivores.

Factors that increase the likelihood of dangerous wildlife encounters

The chance of a risky encounter rises during busy seasons or in high-traffic areas, when wildlife is surprised by people or becomes accustomed to finding food near trails and campsites. Park officials say lack of prior information and not knowing the habits of local species are frequent causes of incidents.

Human behaviors such as getting too close to observe or photograph animals, feeding them, or leaving waste increase the risk. Experts warn that many animals learn to associate people with food, which alters their natural behavior and increases the likelihood of an attack.

Large mammals such as bison, hippos, or moose can react with extreme violence if they feel invaded or threatened. Species like alligators are especially dangerous in the water, where they move quickly and efficiently.

Key rules and recommendations to survive a wildlife encounter

Surviving a wildlife encounter depends largely on prevention and on responding properly when danger arises. Specialists recommend keeping a minimum distance of 100 meters from large predators such as bears, wolves, or big cats, and at least 25 meters from other species. If an animal behaves restlessly, it is best to back away slowly and avoid sudden movements or loud noises.

Never feed animals or leave food or trash in accessible areas. Experts note that an animal habituated to human presence and camp food becomes more dangerous and often must be captured or euthanized to prevent risks. It is essential to store all food and scented items in secure containers and to keep pets leashed so as not to provoke defensive reactions from local wildlife.

For species like alligators, Rolf Olson recommends staying away from the water and avoiding activities such as splashing at the shore, since this behavior can trigger an attack. In any encounter, specialists emphasize that prevention, information, and respect for wildlife are the best tools.

Recent examples and lessons learned from incidents in natural parks

Recent cases show the consequences of ignoring safety recommendations. Records include a bison attacking a visitor who tried to flee after getting too close, causing serious injuries. There are also numerous reports of bites from small mammals, such as squirrels, due to the habit of feeding them or attempting to interact with them.

These incidents demonstrate that overconfidence or seeking close experiences with wild animals can have severe results. Data collected by park officials reinforce the need to keep distance and avoid any behavior that disturbs wildlife’s natural behavior.

Impact of these encounters on park management and the wildlife involved

When incidents occur between visitors and animals, the consequences affect more than people. Reserve managers are forced to intervene, which can involve capturing, relocating, or euthanizing animals that have lost fear of humans or become dangerous.

This situation, in addition to affecting the animals’ lives, complicates conservation efforts and reduces opportunities for other visitors to enjoy the natural environment.

The increase in these episodes requires strengthened monitoring and the implementation of new educational strategies for visitors. Experts stress that each problematic encounter represents a setback for both animal protection and the safe experience of those who visit these areas. Respecting the rules and taking individual precautions are therefore essential to preserve the delicate balance in protected natural areas.

(more…)