Solemn homage of the nation to Simone Veil

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published July 01, 2018

On July 5, when I announced, at the end of the tribute to the Court of Invalides, that Simone VEIL would rest in the Pantheon beside her husband, this decision was not only mine.

It was not that of his family, however, who consented.

This decision was that of all the French.

It is intensively, tacitly, what all French people wanted.

Because France loves Simone VEIL.

She loves him in his struggles, always fair, always necessary, always animated by the concern of the most fragile ones where she engaged with an uncommon strength of character.

France loves her even more because she understood from where she came the strength put at the service of a more dignified humanity.

It is only belatedly, when Simone VEIL spent 50 years that France discovered that the roots of her engagement plunged into the absolute darkness, unspeakable death camps. It was there that she found in her to survive that deep, secret, inalienable part which is called dignity. It was there that, despite the misfortunes and the mourning, she conceived the certainty that in the end, humanity will prevail over barbarism.

All his life was the illustration of this invincible hope. We wanted Simone VEIL to enter the Pantheon without waiting for generations to pass, as we had become accustomed to, so that his struggles, his dignity, his hope remain a compass in the troubled times we are going through.

Because she knew the worst of the twentieth century and yet struggled to make it better, Simone VEIL will rest with her husband in the 6th vault.

She will join four great characters of our history: René CASSIN, Jean MOULIN, Jean MONNET and André MALRAUX. They were like her masters of hope. Like them Simone VEIL fought against prejudices, isolation, against the demons of resignation or indifference without yielding anything, because she knew what France was.

Like them, she braved hostility, acted as a forerunner, embraced causes thought to be lost to remain faithful to the idea she had of the Republic and the hope it placed in it.

It is beautiful today that this woman joins in this place the brotherhood of honor to which, by the spirit, by the values, it belongs by right and of which she had all her life the fights in sharing.

Like René CASSIN, Simone VEIL fought for justice.

In 1948, CASSIN had the United Nations General Assembly ratify the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Simone VEIL knew, however, that in this noble struggle for human rights, half of humanity was stubbornly being forgotten: women.

She had seen their subjugation and their humiliations, she herself had faced inequalities that she considered absurd, outdated. So she builds herself to be fair to women, to all women.

Justice for women detained in unworthy conditions, which she tried when she was a magistrate to improve, justice for women, their financial independence, their marital autonomy, their equality in parental authority.

Justice so that their qualities and talents are recognized and used in all fields.

For the women who were bruised in their flesh, in their souls, by the angel-makers, for the women who had to conceal their distress or shame, and which she wrenched from their suffering by wearing with admirable force the draft law on voluntary termination of pregnancy, at the request of President Valéry GISCARD D'ESTAING and with the support of Prime Minister Jacques CHIRAC.

Justice for women uncertain about their rights and their place in society, for women relegated by laws, clichés, conventions. Justice for all those women who, everywhere in the world, are martyred, abused, sold, mutilated.

With Simone VEIL come here these generations of women who made France, without the nation offering them the recognition and freedom that was due to them. May it be justice for all of them today.

And that on this day, our thoughts go especially to one of them, to a resolute, strong, gentle woman who, in the unspeakable conditions of the death camps, supported her two daughters with all the strength of her love . She would have desired a life of carelessness for her, but for many months her tragic destiny wanted the spectacle of their suffering to add to her, until her final exhaustion, until her death.

I greet here the memory of Simone VEIL's beloved mother, Yvonne Yvonne, born STEINMETZ, who died in Bergen-Belsen in March 1945, whose example inspired Simone VEIL's fight for women.

Like Jean MONNET, Simone VEIL fought for peace and, therefore, for Europe.

She who had lived the unspeakable experience of savagery and arbitrariness knew that only dialogue and harmony between peoples would prevent Auschwitz from reborn on the cold ashes of its victims.

She became a warrior of peace, she became a fighter of Europe. She wanted Europe by realism, not by idealism; by experience, not by ideology; by lucidity, not by naivety.

She was not fond of the irenic faders and the technocratic complications that sometimes became the face of this Europe, because she was of this generation for which our Europe was neither an inheritance nor a constraint, but a conquest of every day.

As parliamentarian, as President of the European Parliament, as a committed citizen, she never ceased to revive the original flame and to embody the founding spirit.

Jean MONNET said that Europe would be the sum of the solutions to these crises. We owe it to Simone VEIL not to let the doubts and crises that hit Europe mitigate the brilliant victory that for 70 years we have won over the rifts and wanderings of past centuries.

Nothing would be worse than giving up the hope that gave birth to Europe from the ruins where it had been buried and where it could have perished.

Today we are the repositories of this challenge to the old nations, which she never ceased to enliven. This challenge is ours, that of the youth of France and Europe, while the bad winds rise again. It is our most beautiful horizon.

Like André MALRAUX, Simone VEIL fought for civilization.

Born before the war, in a civilization that believed itself still immortal, it saw its rapid and cruel collapse. She saw the moral bearings of humanity disappear. She saw SS martyrs the day children in the camps, before finding theirs at night around the family table.

She knew in her flesh that Auschwitz had permanently upset the very idea of ​​civilization. She shared with MALRAUX the sad conclusion that there was no longer any "meaning of man" and no more "meaning of the world". But she also knew that a new civilization could be rebuilt.

Eprise of art and literature, she continued to believe that the culture grows the man and the light on his destiny. She will rest a few meters from her dear Jean RACINE, whom her father André JACOB had so well known how to make her love, who is buried in the church of Saint-Etienne-du-Mont, whose chair she occupied at the French Academy.

Working for education, the rehabilitation of prisoners or as minister, for the protection of the most fragile, she knew that civilizations weave these organic links, these thousand invisible sons.

Engaged in the friendship between the European peoples, it was also in the dialogue between Israelis and Palestinians, because humanity does not stop at our borders.

She believed in this common destiny called nation, and in this exhilarating adventure called civilization, she knew that every day that passes is a new fight against barbarism.

Like Jean MOULIN, Simone VEIL fought for France to remain true to itself.

Betrayed by a French state that made a deal with the Nazi occupier, she could have turned back to her country the pain of her ordeal and her bereavements, she did nothing.

And when she decided to testify of her deportation, it was first to pay homage to the Righteous of France. She rose against those who portrayed a France won by the anti-Semitic delusions of HITLER, PETAIN and LAVAL, to recall the incredible and spontaneous courage of these French families who, at the risk of their lives, had hidden children Jews, saving them from persecution and an atrocious death.

She recalled the time when the French were providing their fellow Jews with forged papers and work certificates. It was the time when the archbishop of Toulouse, Monseigneur Saliege, called for asylum in the churches, it was the time when pastors secretly celebrated Purim in their temple. It was the time when underground solidarities maintained French fraternity.

To the left of the vault number 6, on the wall of the crypt are inscribed the names of the Righteous.

At that time, France also remained France because men and women abandoned everything to swell the ranks of the army of shadows. Then General DE GAULLE charged Jean MOULIN to organize the resistance.

It was for that France, for the real France, against France disfigured whose exiled collaborators continued to defend the crimes that Simone VEIL one day decided to testify.

France, thanks to her and some others, looked in the face what she did not want to see, what she did not want to hear, what she had so wanted to forget and which, nevertheless, was a part of herself. She understood that the nation must not fear the hurt memory of its bruised sons and daughters, but welcome and embrace it.

Simone VEIL never accepted being decorated for being deported, nor did she accept that a rivalry of memories emerges. The reality of the gas chambers and cremation ovens of the extermination camps, instruments of crime against humanity, does not in any way diminish the heroism of the tortured, shot and deported resistance fighters.

But there is a truth of history and the truth of Jewish martyrdom is now an integral part of French history, as is the epic of the Resistance.

Simone VEIL will sit next to Jean MOULIN, the hero of the Resistance, the victim of Klaus BARBIE who delivered no secret under the most abject torture. She, Simone VEIL who martyred by the SS never gave up her dignity.

They are for us two examples of profound humanity, heroic in his sacrifice, admirable for his courage and his testimony. She who, on the left arm, bore the stigma of her misfortune, this number of deported to Birkenau which one day a French asked him if it was his cloakroom number. This number 78651 was the Viaticum of his invulnerable and untouched dignity. It will be engraved on his sarcophagus, as he had been tattooed on his teenage skin. Because in Simone VEIL, it is finally the memory of the racial deportees, as it said itself, of the 78,500 Jews and gypsies deported from France who will enter and live in these places.

Tomorrow, she will join the four French knights who sleep in this vault. Simone VEIL will be able to enter looking at them proudly of this mineral look, always worried. She can tell them, "I did my part."

She will be welcomed as an equal in this family united by ideals and courage called "the French heroes".

She calls us to do our part too.

Another knight will have joined them, a knight serving, because it was not thinkable to disunite what life had so strongly welded, in joy but also in these terrible deaths that were the loss of the sister of Simone VEIL, Madeleine said Snowy, survivor of the camps like her, disappeared in a car accident; and the death of his son Claude-Nicolas, who was struck down in 2002 by a heart attack.

It was not thinkable that Simone should rest without Antoine. This company would have missed him.

Antoine, the talented senior civil servant who brought the young survivor the elegance and humor that allowed him to live again. Antoine, who dreamed of politics and had left the ENA, had begun to meddle in a European liberal fashion. Antoine, who had the intelligence to understand that his wife, brought to politics not the simple desire to change things, but the bitter desire to fight for the most part.

He then put his talent, his love at the service of the battles led by Simone, that he supported even in the difficult hours when his opponents handled the filthy insult and the physical threat.

Their dialogue never ceased, punctuated by laughter and sometimes melancholy, cheered up by a family of three sons: Jean, Claude-Nicolas and Pierre-François and soon twelve grandchildren. This dialogue was interrupted only by the death of Antoine in 2013, he who seemed made to live always, never had the taste of life left him.

The Pantheon will now rustle from the murmur of their conversations.

Your work Madame was great, because she fed on your mourning and your wounds, your fidelities and your intransigences, but also because you have fully dedicated to France and the Republic.

All that you did, you did it also because the Republic called you there, you took it, you encouraged it. You believed in the Republic and the Republic believed in you. The size of one has made the greatness of the other. It is because with all your might you have honored her that today she honors you.

Your work however is not completed. She enters here in history and in posterity. May your battles continue to flow in our veins, inspire our youth and unite the people of France. May we continually show ourselves worthy as citizens, as people of the risks you have taken and the paths you have traced, for it is in these risks and on these roads, Madame, that France is truly France.

In the evening of your life, you wished that a kaddich be said on your grave, your wish was granted by your family on July 5, 2017, in the cemetery of Montparnasse.

Today, France offers you another song, the one of which the Ravensbrück prisoners had embroidered the first words on paper belts; and that they sang on July 14, 1944 in front of the stupefied SS. This song that the deportees, each in their language, sang when their camp was finally released, because they knew it all by heart. This song of which the world resonated when barbarism again showed us its ugly face.

This song is that of the Republic, it is that of France that we love and that you have made bigger and stronger. May it be today, Madam, the singing of our gratitude and the gratitude of the nation that you have served so much and which has loved you so much.

This song is the Marseillaise.

Long live the Republic, long live France.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Transcript – Statement by the President of the Republic on the occasion of the joint press conference with the President of the Spanish Government

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published June 23, 2018

Rubric: Europe, Nation, Institutions and State Reform

ONLY THE PRONOUNCED FAITH.

Elysee Palace, June 23, 2018

Ladies and gentlemen, I am delighted to have received today the President of the Spanish Government, Pedro SANCHEZ, at the Elysee Palace for his first bilateral visit since he took office a few weeks ago. This interview after telephone exchanges that we had already had together made it possible to note that we shared the same vision of Europe and the same will to refound it.

On the many issues that we have been able to discuss, I believe that we share the observation that the challenges on migration topics such as economic topics are particularly real and that facing them, the risk is a risk of fragmentation, dismantling European by return of nationalisms. And our common will, I think I can say it is to answer it by a true European refoundation, that is to say a realistic Europe which protects, which carries an ambition and decides and acts.

On the subject of migration, together we have prepared the next coming deadlines, in particular the summit in Brussels, where we will both be here tomorrow, and then the European Council next weekend.

France and Spain share the same strategy to respond effectively and humane to the arrival of migrants and this strategy is based on three pillars that are also indispensable.

The first is the strengthening of our support and cooperation with the countries of origin and transit, and I must in this respect welcome the cooperation that Spain has been able to establish with several African countries. At the summit of August 28th that France had organized, Spain was present and we were able to carry out several concrete actions and I hope that we can continue on this point with all the countries, especially in Africa that they are country of origin or passage of these migrants. It is at the same time a policy of development, a politics of security partnership, also political of fight against the traffickers as we began to do it with efficiency in the Sahel.

The second pillar is the reinforcement of Frontex and therefore of the external protection of the European Union, of the Schengen area, which, I believe, is slowly gaining consensus. This is one of the proposals I could make. last fall. Giving more human resources, legal materials, protecting borders and facilitating the return of migrants who do not fall under the right of asylum is an indispensable response to the situation we are familiar with and which is also a legitimate expectation of many countries of first arrival in Europe.

Finally, the reorganization of the reception and treatment of migrants in Europe, according to principles of responsibility and solidarity, is the third pillar of the strategy we want to promote. In this respect, I would like to emphasize here the excellent cooperation we have with Spain and that we have had in the particular case of Aquarius. I welcome the decision of the President of the Spanish Government to welcome the boat and to have accepted this solution of European solidarity, arranged if I can say in haste, but which allowed the OFPRA, therefore the French Agency in charge refugees, asylum seekers, to go to Spain and work in connection with your services so that France can take its share of the asylum seekers who are on your territory today.

But what we want is to be able to manage things not on a case-by-case basis, but to really propose a clear scheme of solidarity that makes it possible to respond to this challenge and the proposal that we will discuss tomorrow but, I believe, on which we have both a common position, it is on the one hand that the landing respects the humanitarian rules and principles of the relief and in this matter, it is the closest safe harbor; it is then that, from the time of disembarkation, we can plan closed centers on the basis of what UNHCR proposes with European means, organize rapid procedures for examining situations, and quickly renew those who are not entitled. to the asylum and share the welcome of others. This is the spirit of true European solidarity organized in the manner of what UNHCR proposes with very practical practical elements and I hope that we will be able in the coming days to act with a common European decision which is the only one that will respond effectively and humanly to the tragedy we are living.

This is exactly what brought our joint work during these last days between Spain and France.

We also talked about economic issues and the euro area and the agreement found in particular with Chancellor Angela MERKEL in Meseberg. I know that Spain shares our ambition for the deepening of the euro zone both to give it a euro zone budget to advance on the Banking Union and therefore to be able to create, here too, rules for solidarity and common responsibility.

In this regard, the agreement reached at Meseberg is an important step and we will have to work together on this subject in the coming months, work on the rules that will be implemented and all the details and we decided on this point of to further increase our cooperation and to be able to work hand in hand on this subject. I also wish to mention these topics, especially the euro zone, to welcome the agreement reached by the finance ministers on the Greek debt on Thursday. The end of the euro area financial assistance program is also a historic milestone for Greece and for the euro area, and this agreement is also an important milestone and a major effort that has been made by the Prime Minister. Minister TSIPRAS, his government, and which was carried by all the Greek people to whom I wish here to pay homage.

These agreements on the euro area, the one we obtained in French-German a few days ago, as the agreement of Ministers on Greece shows that our economic and monetary union is not blocked but that when there is determination, a will to cooperate and find good European solutions, we can find an ability to move forward together and our will is to be able to do so in this context with the same spirit.

In Europe of defense, Spain is a major partner for France and actively supports with us the various advances conducted over the past year. Our ministers of the Armed Forces will sign an important agreement Monday to concretely launch the European initiative that I had also proposed at the Sorbonne and I want to thank the Spanish Prime Minister for his commitment. Finally, we also talked about energy transition, we will have the opportunity to share important moments – the Spanish Prime Minister will come back in a few moments on this topic – but I hope that we can accelerate the joint work on energy interconnection between our countries and we will talk about it in the coming weeks.

I also hope that our cooperation can go further and that on the subject of the climate transition, a minimum carbon price, a work on the structuring of the next stage, a real European carbon market and of a real energy and climate transition, we can bring together common initiatives.

Here, ladies and gentlemen, I believe that this first meeting was very fruitful and it augurs for a resolute action of Spain and France together in favor of the revival of Europe.

Mr. President of the Government, dear Pedro, I wanted to thank you for taking this step and accepting the invitation to come to Paris today for this friendly exchange of work before we meet tomorrow in Brussels and in Brussels. weekend again in Brussels. In any case, thank you very much and thank you for this exchange.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Transcript of the joint press conference of the President of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron and the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published June 21, 2018

Category: Europe

ONLY THE PRONOUNCED FAITH.

Thank you very much Chancellor, thank you dear Angela for, first, the organization of this Franco-German Council of Ministers and the exchange we have just had here in Meseberg, and the report that was fact. This summit was expected and I believe we are at the rendezvous.

This summit comes – and I believe we must not in any way make it a mystery – at a moment of truth in Europe and a moment of truth in each of our States and for our continent. On economic, commercial and financial subjects, on the subjects of foreign policy, defense as the major subjects of migration, it is today a real choice of society which is under discussion. It may even be a choice of civilization with, on the one hand, those who would like to say that Europe is good at unraveling and no longer able to meet its challenges, and on the other hand, those who believe – I think I can say it, as we do – that we can move this Europe forward by making it both more sovereign and more united because, on the geopolitical and migratory subjects as well as on the economic subjects the challenge we face today is whether we want to strengthen our ability to protect our citizens from decisions coming from abroad, the great geopolitical risks and to be more united, to have more solidarity between we and therefore defend Europe to which we believe.

On all of these topics, we have shown, I believe, through today's discussion and joint work, that our choice was clear, it is both a choice that allows us to respond to the seriousness of the problem. historical moment that we live, refuses to stammer our history and allows, I believe it also very deeply, much more efficiency.

On the geopolitical, defense or migratory topics, the question is how can we better defend, protect our Europe against the big geopolitical and international uncertainties which, today, through the subject of migrations, come in some way to meet the the lives of our fellow citizens who, for a long time, were able to believe that international subjects or subjects of development were distant subjects that were reserved for summits between heads of state and government, for discussions between diplomats. No, it's all held. Our world is united and we are not a dive island in the middle of nowhere.

On this subject, the choice we have made here is reaffirmed and clear, so we want more sovereignty and unity. This is the spirit of the text we adopted in the area of ​​foreign policy, where we wanted more coordination and, according to forms to be discussed, the will to have an approach in terms of foreign policy and security articulated , coordinated at European level. This has fueled our progress in defense policy in recent months with permanent structured cooperation, but also with the European Defense Fund. We completed it with several of our colleagues – we will be 10 in total – by a European intervention initiative that will better coordinate our intervention doctrines, to advance from next week, when it will be launched, to bring our strategic cultures closer together, to exchange through our planning work or military personnel and thus to have a much more pragmatic approach together.

This is also what led us in the right line of what we had outlined on July 13, 2017 together to concretize today the launch of two major joint programs of ground combat with the tank of the future and aerial combat with the airplane of the future. These are, I believe, on this subject, extremely important progress that should be welcomed.

It is with this same determination that we believe very deeply in a European response to the migration challenge. This challenge, we have not just discovered, we did not discover last week, but we are very clearly together determined to act in a European way and in a coordinated manner with all Member States that have with us topics in common and all that can be done at this level, at European level and therefore with all 28 Member States.

We will continue in the coming hours and days to work very closely together so that we can make proposals in this area around three axes in line with what the Chancellor has just recalled. A first axis, the one we both discussed with our Italian friends, the one that I will also have the opportunity to discuss with the Spanish Prime Minister Saturday noon, is our ability to work more with countries of origin and transit. This subject is not new either. We have done a lot in recent years with each other and again in recent months with several countries in North Africa and especially Libya. This is the very meaning of the stabilization action we are taking in Libya and which we are going to intensify with, here too, concrete initiatives that we are preparing for the coming days, particularly the Libyan coastguard actions. to develop information and prevention actions by UNHCR and IOM to dismantle illegal channels and smuggling networks and dismantle all funding mechanisms.

And so we will intensify joint initiatives in this area to better prevent these flows, which is both more effective and more humanitarian because the humanitarian risk begins the second we leave the shores, the shores of Libya or those other countries. And we have seen it unfortunately several times in the Mediterranean.

Secondly, we want a better protection of the European borders and we support in this matter the proposals of the European Commission and in particular by significantly increasing the resources of the Frontex agency up to 10,000 men, by deploying these resources. support in the countries that manage the external borders of Europe to gradually make it a true European border police force. We also want to have a real European asylum agency and harmonize our rights on this issue.

Finally, the third pillar of the action we want to lead in this area within the European Union is to have an effective system of solidarity and responsibility which implies that upon arrival on European soil, registration of persons can be made, asylum applications, if necessary, very quickly examined, deportations executed when the arrivals are not eligible for asylum and this means, both intergovernmentalally and on the a series of very concrete developments that we wish to promote together and an accelerated revision of the Dublin Regulation which is also a project on which we have common views.

On this subject, we therefore need, as you understand it, both more sovereignty and therefore the capacity to protect our common borders and more unity, that is to say mechanisms of solidarity, at the same time. outside our borders and within our borders.

It is exactly the same philosophy that has fueled our debates and our response in economic matters. If we look at the current economic situation of the euro area, we lack sovereignty, solidarity and unity. We are being jostled by the unilateral decisions of our American partners and allies in trade. We are too often divided and we have taken a lot longer than other regions, like the United States, to get out of the 2008-2010 crisis. We must therefore find, in particular at the level of the euro area, but also at the level of the whole of the European Union, the mechanisms here too of greater sovereignty and greater unity.

Sovereignty, it goes through a single coordinated response in commercial matters, the one we have consistently brought in these last weeks and that we wish here to remind, reaffirm very clearly and I wish we could to work together and propose to our colleagues a series of mechanisms that will strengthen Europe's financial, economic and commercial sovereignty with its trading partners, its economic interests and its own interests and to cope with all the changes, all the uncertainties and to undergo any extraterritoriality.

But this is also what we want for the euro zone and within the euro zone. Today we are entering a second stage of the life of our single currency. As we can see, we have not succeeded today fully or in making the euro a complete alternative to the dollar and we have experienced it in recent weeks, we must be clear on the statement, nor a monetary area that had sufficient convergence mechanisms, unity, sufficient cement to avoid systemic crises like those we experienced. That is why today we want to seal a major agreement and I, in turn, want to thank our Finance Ministers who have worked on this subject in recent weeks with many discussions and submitted a very ambitious and precise text, but we together with the Chancellor, decided to move forward to open a new page of the euro area and our common organization and we will have to work in the coming days and weeks with all our partners in the euro area and we will have to complete obviously in the coming months this work. And for me, it is based around several objectives and several instruments.

First of all, a goal of stability that Chancellor MERKEL immediately recalled. We want to be able to revise our instruments so that when a country is faced with an asymmetrical shock, there may be an aid mechanism or when its financial system is jostled, there may be a mechanism of stability and solidarity . It is in this that we wished to advance on a reform of the European Stability Mechanism so that there is a new financing instrument in this matter and that we have also wished to advance together on the establishment for our banking union of 'a safety net in good French "backstop", which can respond in time and in the manner defined by our ministers to the challenge of financial stability.

And so, as you can see, through both the European Stability Mechanism and the safety net that complements the banking union, we respond, it seems to me, in a credible way to the challenge of economic stability and stability. within the euro area. And so it is up to us now to continue the work but this decision, which was not acquired a few months ago, is a major breakthrough that we need and which would have solved a few years ago much faster and much more more strongly the beginning of the financial crisis that the euro zone has experienced.

Then we agreed on the creation of a euro area budget with a function of convergence and investment between the economies of the euro area. It will be a real budget with annual revenue and expenditure, decisions by the euro area states and execution of the expenditure by the European Commission. We will have to work together with our partners on, of course, the topics of growth rate, governance in the framework of what we have just approved and, as the Chancellor reminded us, we wish to be able to start this budget of the euro area in the next budget, in the next financial perspective and therefore that both can start in 2021.

This reform, this finalization of the banking union, this reform of the European Stability Mechanism with a real function of macro-economic stabilization, this creation of a budget of the euro zone are important reforms on which we worked a lot together and which are a political commitment that we take together which will, as Angela MERKEL pointed out at the moment, assume, on the one hand, technical work at the ministerial level until the end of the year; then, probably the following year, a chosen moment, treaty changes that are essential if we want to move in this direction and an entry into force for the reform of the European Stability Mechanism and the budget in 2021.

Never since almost 10 years that one talks about it a Franco-German agreement had been found on the budget of the euro area. There is still a lot of work, a lot of technical questions and it is obvious that we can not purge them in a few hours or even a few weeks of discussion, but what is certain is that we can not solve them. there is no first and foremost a political agreement, a common vision to respond to contemporary challenges and this one, we assert today very strongly and very clearly through this work. And so, in terms of security, defense and migration, as well as in economic and financial matters, we respond to contemporary challenges with greater European sovereignty, more unity and solidarity, and a very strong convergence of views between our two countries. country and a willingness to convince our partners to move forward with us on this line.

The Chancellor also reminded us of the importance in the work of our ministers of what has been decided on space, breakthrough innovation and in particular artificial intelligence, climate with carbon neutrality in 2050, the project of European universities that we make concrete together and strong commitments in terms of fiscal convergence which was also a project stuck for almost 10 years where we decide together and bring to the European level an ambitious project of fiscal convergence for the taxation of our societies which is, I believe, a very strong element and a desire to arrive this year at the European level, an agreement on the taxation of digital.

Here, ladies and gentlemen, what I wanted to recall here. To thank the Chancellor again, dear Angela, for her invitation and all the work that has been done and tell her that, like her, I very deeply believe that it is in these times that we have to decide, it will be without doubt about these decisions that we will have to be judged and that I am delighted that we have been able to decide together looking at the future.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Transcription of the speech of the President of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron, during the congress of the Mutualité Française in Montpellier

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published June 14, 2018

Section: Health and solidarity

Only the delivery is authenticMontpellier – Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Thank you Mr President, thank you for this speech and your welcome, Mr President, Madam Minister, Ladies and Gentlemen Parliamentarians, Madam Regional President, Mayor, ladies and gentlemen.

Thank you Mayor to welcome us in this beautiful city of Montpellier, I understood that once a century, this city hosted Mutuality, and that it is the moment – it is not the only one – where the presidents come to express themselves, and there is a little more than a century, it is the president POINCARE which, in this same city, you found, proof if it were, that your movement is rooted in the history of the Republic and has always had that special connection, President, that you just recalled.

Social justice, solidarity, dignity, these are the republican commitments, and you have just now retraced, in some fundamental sectors, on some essential issues of our society, the importance of these commitments and these values, of course, we continue to promise every Frenchwoman and every Frenchwoman their fundamental rights. Of course, we continue to make a social protection system work which gives solidarity a universal dimension. But in fact, what we see is that every day the effectiveness of these rights is challenged, every day, many of our fellow citizens find that universality is fraught with exceptions, disparities, deadlock, that the situations or rights promised are not real rights, and they discover it too late, when the emergency is there, when the distress is there, when they need a foundation of solidarity national, they sometimes feel it, too often, to hide under their feet.

We live in a country where the republican promise is so often disappointed, because we have maintained the formal rights without worrying enough to make them real rights for everyone, at school, in the world of work, in the world of health, the French are viscerally attached to rights, but they too often realize that for many, they exist only on paper and more in fact; this is the French indignation contemporary. Yet, and this is a real paradox, we are devoting an ever greater share of our national wealth to social protection. So, yes, we can be proud of our system of social protection, it honors us, and it has, over the decades, responded to these indignations, the same which I immediately echo, but it would have, in a way, dispensed from a still more demanding effort, that of looking at the reality of our society in the face, the effectiveness of each of the rights, the folds of society, the obscure, cursed parts where these promised rights are lost, where these formal rights are no longer reality. A society that is increasingly secretive of destiny, of course, of opportunities, a society that excludes the possibility of recourse to entire sections of our population, a society that can not only redeem this political and moral bankruptcy by monetary redistribution, necessarily always insufficient. And this is the misunderstanding that I would like to start with this morning with you, I heard many commentators say "it will go before the mutuals and it will make a great social turning point."

But I'm going to tell you, I do not feel that when you get back on the economy, when you allow people to produce more, you're not against the social model, you're an example. alive, but it is to produce to redistribute, I do not feel that when we make the reforms of the school, college, high school, university made for a little over a year, we the enemy of justice, but the root of the evil is attacked. The fact that we have, for decades, been content with formal rights, strictly monetary redistribution, forgetting the inequalities of destiny, our system today is more unequal than 30 years ago on the academic level, on the plan for access to the most qualified jobs, be it the company or the senior civil service, our system is more deterministic than it was 30 years ago, it is a reality. And so to tackle the inequalities is to attack their roots, it's wanting to shake up a society that has become a society of status, it's wanting to recognize that all these challenges are not just monetary, it's wanting, in a way, to reinvent – but you'll hiss me at the end if you wish, but let me finish, especially since I do not see you – and it's knowing how to reinvent our welfare state, this one does not offer Too often as the last necessary safety net, which we will maintain, but it does not sufficiently guarantee the conditions of a dignified life. That's the fight I want for this five-year, dignified life! And a dignified life, that does not mean to promise to stay where we are born, it does not mean to promise to stay where we fell, it means to be able to choose at any moment where we can his life, and that means having a society that gives you the conditions of that dignity.

We have inherited a welfare state from the 20th century, and we must strengthen it, but we must build a welfare state for dignity and emancipation for the 21st century, and we need a collective organization of fraternity, which ensures the dignity of everyone, that is my main objective, it is that of the State, but you are perfectly right, it can not be alone, it is that of local authorities, which, all, are engaged in this action, regions, departments, metropolises, municipalities is the work of the social partners in contact with the real, the social every day. And it is that of all the social actors and these actors a little particular you recalled the history and strength that are indeed the mutualists, actors of national solidarity, committed to this cause which, you have recalled, all at the same time protect and act, have built through the centuries this ability to provide answers in terms of protection, but also to act on the ground, to offer care, attention, and I will not forget, in other times, the hours spent not far from Lorient, to Kerpape, seeing the work that had been done and the excellence of this one. But it is also the commitment, the time given on a voluntary basis in councils and in the action on the ground to change. It is the participation of your movement in the Republican project that will allow, with all the actors that I have mentioned, this radical refoundation that we need today. Our choice is simple, it is the choice between, in a way, two loyalties, that is, we remain faithful to a system that no longer meets the objectives of social justice that it had originally assigned, and which does not is, moreover, more in line with the expectations of our fellow citizens and the actors who do it. Either we choose together to be faithful to the values ​​that unite us, to reinvent a system that makes the rights effective and concrete for all our fellow citizens. It is this second way with you that I will choose, it is more difficult, it probably takes more time, it is not settled simply by budget promises or commitments that will be held late. It implies our immediate action and it invites us collectively to give in to neither cynicism nor hypocrisy. The most precious part of our social system is the spirit that gives it birth. It is this visionary solidarity of the members of the National Council of Resistance who invented the system that is perfectly suited to a bruised people and a nation undergoing reconstruction. Our mission is to reconnect with this spirit, not to be afraid of change, because society has changed, and not to make us the vestals of a social order that, for 25 years, the evolution of the world, morals, society has come to shake its foundations and whose effectiveness it has come to undermine. We too could, after so many others, yield to the worship of totems, but I would always prefer effective social justice to incantations, and efficiency to fetishism. That is why, what we must do in terms of national solidarity, is a profound revolution that gives the French their rights, their dignity, their hope, and I will summarize it around three principles: prevention, which attacks the inequalities before it is too late, because it is both more efficient and more just, universality, which gives the same rights to everyone, in a transparent way, because it is the only way to rebuild trust in our system, dignity through help, accompaniment, presence, work as the key to emancipation for all who can access it, because that is what allows everyone to truly build your life. The solution is not to spend more money or to consider that there would be, on the one hand, those who believe in social transformation and who would align lines of credit, and those who do not believe it. and that would necessarily be to reduce the expenses. First, bad news, social expenses, you pay them, we pay them, and too often, in our country, we consider that when it is the State, it would be the other, it is us, even worse, it may be our children, when the accumulated deficit becomes debt.

The question is to look it in the face three major challenges on which I would like to come back, me entering in some way into your steps, and try on the basis of three principles, which I have just mentioned, to provide some answers, the health, age and exclusion. Health, things have been profoundly changed during the decades that have gone by, our system is in crisis, but it is not yesterday, the impatience is there, and it is legitimate, the suffering on a daily basis for women and men who every day care for those who cannot wait, those who suffer and those who call for an immediate response. And if we look in the face of our health system, it heals well, and we should be proud of, it is effective when compared to other large systems, but it prevents poorly, much less well than the others, it is without a doubt his first feature, however, if we prevent evil, we let our fellow citizens go to pathologies which are heavier and therefore more expensive, sometimes out of the company. Having a system that prevents better is at once better on the plan of the collective health and of the effectiveness of our system. It is this policy, carried out since several years by our predecessors, continued and intensified by the government, for example, in the field of tobacco, is in the process of permitting, with the first results which, gradually, will give in the time of their effectiveness

The second challenge we face is that of age, you have – and I will not return – perfectly described one of our collective successes, the success of our economies and developed societies, we live more old, and we also live older in good health. This obviously raises several questions for our collective organization that should not be ignored, the pension system can be totally unchanged in a society that continues to age and where the life expectancy – and we must rejoice – in the time after the active life, as we have thought until then, lengthens, where also the time of the studies lengthened before the active life. The chronology of our lives is no longer that of 20 or 30 years ago, the time of studies has grown, the time for relearning throughout life is taking hold, and the duration retirement is getting longer too. However, we spend a lot on our pension system, often more than our neighbors, but we have not, despite all the reforms of our predecessors, failed to fully implement the viability of this system in the long term, and most importantly, failed to rebuild the confidence of our fellow citizens over time. A very large majority of young people who are entering the labor market think that they will not have a pension, that their retirement will not be ensured by a system of intergenerational solidarity, this system of redistribution that I hold and which will be maintained because mistrust has established itself, distrust has also set in because we have 42 regimes, which, by sedimentation, have constructed the small differences, and with them, the small inequalities which may have been justified, but do they still have it? Most of the time, no. Because they have responded to a status society, but they no longer correspond to contemporary challenges. As you said, there are still real inequalities in old age, but often they do not fit with the statutes or the pension plans, because they correspond to quite particular, individual situations, related to the accidents of life, to the exposure to certain risks that everyone has known, and not to the status he has married at a time in his life and which he will change for the generation that comes to life today active. And so this system, which has gradually been designed over time and which responds to the challenges of a post-war, industrial, long-cycle society, is no longer suitable for an aging society, where the courses are more and more hurdles, where the courses are more and more individualized, and where the inequalities have become statutory. And our ability to respond to it will be the condition of collective trust in the system.

But the aging of our population raises a second challenge, as you rightly pointed out, that of old age, of dependence, a subject which at the same time upsets us, and which many of us would like to hold on to. away, our society does not want to see at the same time the great vulnerability, but also the place of death which, at a moment of this path, arrives. That said a lot of us, and I will not dwell on this point today, I would be too long, but the addiction is there, and this new vulnerable age of life is settling down. To not see it or to consider that it would be the business of a few, is not to treat ourselves with dignity, it is not to treat with dignity women and men who, once again, have the responsibility the daily lives of women and men who sometimes live their last hours, their last weeks, and of which they, those who care for them, often the last family. Our inability today to respond to this challenge has built social suffering in long-term care homes, in dependent persons or for their families, we must face this, it is a collective failure, and I wear it from where I am with the solemnity that must be mine. We will not solve it overnight, but we must face this changing society, understand it and consider that our response is not at the right height in terms of collective solidarity and that, because our fellow citizens older people are returning to nursing homes or institutions, they also need more and more early care, and that these establishments that were created to accompany a moment in life, where or could not stay in the family, are changing and become places where we also need a care to wear, a medicalization that does not exist everywhere or not enough, and therefore for which our response must be different and on which we must think a collective reorganization.

The third challenge facing us is that of exclusion, if we do not look at our poorest fellow citizens, if we do not look at this part of society which nation are we? I have often been criticized for being only for metropolises, sorry for Montpellier, for this France that succeeds, that for great people, etc., yes, I want to encourage them because if they can not do it there is no chance that the rest of society can get away with it, I confirm it. And so I want those who can produce, succeed hiring, do it even more, because I look everywhere around us, and putting a cap on success has never solved the problem of exclusion . But I say it, I repeat it and I will continue it tirelessly to do it, when those who succeed do not want to look at those who are left at the edge of the road, in what society do they want to live? As they watch the extremes mount around them, the hate speech ignites democracies. It is the fruit of selfishness and blindness. And so we must, while making our economy a stronger economy, more productive, while being the proponents of innovation, a revitalized economic force, also want to address the problem of poverty and poverty. exclusion in our society. And here too, let's face reality. We have in recent decades, spent more and more on this topic. And did we solve the problem? No. Did we warn him better? No. Have we changed the trajectories, allowed people to get out more? No. Have we better accompanied? Rarely. When I look at the figures today, the reality is that we have many devices, but children born in poverty are still too often and determinism has become established. Today the face of poverty, what is it? One in five children, one in three single parent families. This is the face of poverty, it is plural, it is diverse, it is not a big whole in which one could somehow include a static part of the society that is ours. We have created a system that has progressively become the dehumanized state. It was thought that the answer to exclusion and poverty was money. We have, in the last ten years, increased the RSA by 80%, but we have reduced support by 40% in terms of expenditure. This figure says it all. Today we have 50% of those who are at RSA, who after four 4 years are still at RSA. We have 30% of women and men who do not, who do not go to the benefits that are promised to them, because they are too complex or stigmatizing, and therefore we have a system that prevents badly, stigmatizes and is too complex, which is not very humane and which does not allow those who fall into it, who fall into these situations of exclusion or poverty, to get out of it as quickly as possible, to find their full place in the society. And here too we must, with all the harshness of the statement I make, and I do it for myself, this observation I make for us, I do not do it for those who are in these situations, because that they are the first victims, because one does not choose one's situation, but if we do not face the reality of our own, and the failures of our action, how can we answer it?

On these three major challenges: health, aging and exclusion, we are here. So, the solution is to tackle in my eyes the problem at the root, the dysfunctions of a social system too focused on the actors and not enough on our compatriots, to have more prevention, more support, more of collective responsibility of each of us, and try to bring, by a profound transformation that will take time, which is perhaps less staggering than money put on the table, but I am sure much more efficient, because it will go with investment in certain public policies, and indeed of the expense that we will assume, but also of the transformation and the savings which will have to know how to make on the useless parts of the expenses which I have just described.

This collective transformation, I want us to lead it together on the three challenges I just mentioned. On health first and foremost, we post a total dependent burden on health expenditures of around 8.5%. But what is the reality of this system for those who have a little less money, a little less access to practitioners, a little less habits also to consult regularly? And on the basic services that make everyday life, what is the reality of the system? If we want him to better warn and treat better close to the field, and as soon as possible realities. This is the rest of the charge for dental prostheses, today is an average of 43%, which means on average 200 € for a crown, it is 22% on optics, which is on average, even if the differences are very important in his sector, 65 € for the correction of myopia. It is 53% on hearing aids, that is to say 1,700 € on average, to be equipped. I'm talking about the rest of the charge. Does this mean that many of our fellow citizens, who have simple pathologies, have to give up treatment? But what does that mean very concretely? Because we put our words that are sometimes a bit technical. That means that the possibility of smiling, seeing, hearing, sometimes eating normally, our fellow citizens, who because of the rest of the charge does not have access to these prostheses, are deprived. This means that behind them are children who can not read at school as they should, since the ability to wear glasses is one of the main causes of poor learning and learning. Illiteracy at the end of primary school. This means that some of our fellow citizens, who are excluded from work, can not come back to work because they can not afford to heal their teeth or because they can not afford to fix their teeth. a hearing that has become defective means that our older citizens, when they begin to lose hearing and can not afford to correct it, will fall more quickly into dependency. Sorry to be concrete, but that's it. And behind what I describe concrete situations, which are more prosaic than our words that sometimes protect the reality, it is each time individual dramas, it is this inequality of trajectory of which I spoke to you. It does not seem anything, but after a while, it becomes irrattrapable. So yes, we need to intervene sooner, faster, more massively, it's the best way to fight against inequalities, and that's what we did, with the rest being zero-load or 100% health. The profound transformation that we have undertaken, will certainly be presented first in its financial aspect, it is real and it is obvious that to allow all those who hitherto could not, for monetary reasons, benefit from auditory, dental or dental care. optics is an essential social conquest, and it is an investment that I assume, an investment that we are going to share together, and which will make it possible to reduce this burden to zero.

[Arrests of the room on lower taxes]

THE CHAIRPERSON: So, for everyone to be clear, I think that the two arrests are convergent, it is the proposal to return to the taxation of the sector, to allow it to invest more. I will be perfectly clear: the agreement built through the involvement of all, and I really want to thank you for it and the work and commitment of the minister, is independent of these measures. So if we go in that direction, I'll ask you more, but I'm ready to open that discussion. But, I would not want us to be misunderstood because the agreement reached is not subject to a reform of the sector's taxation. Now I am ready to open a discussion on the taxation of the sector, so that together we can do more and be more effective in the engagement of the sector. And that, you will always have with you if it is necessary to go in a system of common sense on which you call me. I'm coming back, but I would not want this improvised dialogue to get in the way that I was denouncing, where the state would discuss with the mutual sector, forgetting that behind it are our fellow citizens and their interests.

So back to our dentures, optics and hearing and their reimbursement. The logic behind this fundamental advance is, as I said, a monetary one, but it is based first and foremost on an increased use of care. This is to prevent that the pathologies concerned become more serious, more disabling, and for this, it is to significantly strengthen prevention, particularly among the youngest, with systematic screenings, and that's it for me, what you have collectively managed to negotiate in recent months and that is essential. We will put in place screening for visual and auditory disorders, reinforced at an early age, with three new consultations of the attending physician or school. To reduce the use of dental prosthetic care, we will introduce a test for 3-year-olds, but also for 24-year-olds. This is prevention, it is to ensure that, at the earliest, for our fellow citizens, there is access to consultation to see if there is a need for care, or there are behaviors to change. And this is part of the agreement, and that too is interesting for mutuals, for professionals, for the State, because by instituting these consultations at the earliest, we warn better and therefore we will spend less. This prevention, it also goes with an accountability of all professionals, and the revalorization of certain acts. This is the coherence I want to emphasize here, the agreement that has been reached. For example, for dentists, the fact of greatly increasing the value of conservative care, because professionals today were not well paid for this care, where they were essentially making their income, which was legitimate, on more serious acts. late and more expensive for our fellow citizens, as for the community. But we must also be responsible, we want dentists who can live well in their profession, who can continue to settle and therefore the collective choice that is better to pay for conservative care, goes in this direction, and also allows have a much more consistent approach to healing.

The other part of the prevention revolution will be based on easy access to health professionals, because the full reimbursement of the glasses, essential, is useless if it takes 12 months to have an appointment with an ophthalmologist. And so for that, we will go further in the organization of professional cooperation. The profession of dental assistant will be expanded, we will go further in the training of opticians and increase the number of hearing care professionals. It is a set of the organization of the professions to which we must go. But what I want you to touch here, through this reform, is that we will, by the collective commitment, by the illustration of what you called your wishes Mr. President, is it- to say the commitment of the State, the commitment of mutuals, insurers, all health professionals and those who provide precisely the protection, the commitment of the social partners and health insurance we have found an intelligent solution that allows one hand to have an answer in terms of purchasing power, we will spend 1,700 € to zero, 200 € to zero, 65 € to zero! So it's purchasing power for our fellow citizens. We will allow better prevention and we will allow an organization on these three professions of the care system, much smarter and that responds to the challenges that it has just described. And so, you have on these three topics, collectively, been able to bring an answer to the challenges, to the stalemate in which we were until then. Purchasing power, prevention, better services because better collective organization of care. We have for this, as I said, and that is why I also wanted to thank you, need the commitment and responsibility of all. And you are the example, ladies and gentlemen, on the 100% health of this commitment. The compulsory health insurance will contribute to the financing of the reform, by doubling its support for hearing aids for adults by 2022, but alongside the compulsory health insurance, the complementary organizations that you represent, have also committed to taking their part in the coverage of this 100% health basket. Complementary health care contracts, which ensure more than 90% of the French, will have to cover this basket. And of course, this reform can not generate a specific increase in the cost of acquiring a complementary health insurance for the insured, it is the collective commitment that we took and there is not in this business, of dupes market. And I saw the nascent polemics, not on this agreement but on the past, the increase of some complementary, it is the commitment of the collective responsibility of the actors which makes it possible to control the costs, what you knew how to do in several sectors. It is also the complete transparency, the healthy competition organized that avoids practices whose first victims are our fellow citizens. This is your commitment here, and I thank you and I count on you to succeed this challenge to be at the rendezvous that the French will expect concretely for full implementation, over the next three years, since this reform will be finalized by 2021. So yes, we must intervene earlier, faster, more massively, by mobilizing all. This is the best way to address health inequities, which I mentioned earlier. And we have also invested considerably, in this area, we are as I said, legitimately proud of our health system, the performance of our hospitals, but there are also situations of failure on which I came back.

To meet these challenges, we must also, for the hospital, for all health professionals and for our fellow citizens, who use our health care system, succeed in providing a more appropriate response and transforming our historical model. We are faced with considerable disparities, a maladjustment of this model, oriented towards an individual and curative approach to acute care, as I said, as new needs for prevention and long-term care emerge, with chronic diseases, with aging. If we want to privilege quality and prevention, we must also, beyond this first agreement obtained, lead a reorientation of the organization of the care system, to treat pathologies very early, in order to rethink our collective organization . We need to move progressively from logic, care supply management, overly rigid mapping, from an overly numerical and budgetary approach, to a logic of demands based on the services to be rendered to the population on the territory. on their pool of life, and a logic more individualized, that is to say turned towards the patient. To meet these needs for local care, the actors must organize themselves in networks, decompartmentalize the city medicine and the hospital, also guaranteeing access to at least five services, access to a doctor. Permanence of care and access to unscheduled care, continuity of care, gradual care, screening and vaccination. And beyond these five minimum services, we must build this medicine, which will be patient-oriented and that will allow it, which will allow, sorry, to build its path in the health system, and at every moment to protect it the best. I do not want to speak about work that has not been completed, the minister is continuing the consultations, and we will have the opportunity to come back in the summer, and I will speak to the minister. summer, at the end of all these consultations. You will also have some responsibility to take, ladies and gentlemen, in the transformation of the health system. The role of complementary insurance is not always limited to the reimbursement of care, you are health providers yourself, not just payers and therefore you know the intimacy, if I may say, of the complexity that I just recalled from health care services to health centers to long-term care homes. And the mutualist spirit is also helping to build care pathways in sometimes isolated areas, for the benefit of the most vulnerable patients, to invest in prevention, to cooperate with professionals. Basically, you have in your genes part of the answers we want to bring to this contemporary challenge. And so, as you can see, on this subject, we will have in the summer, to take a position there too on a profound transformation, which is not just a monetary subject, but which will involve a profound reorganization, and which will involve also to review all the structures to which we have been accustomed since 10 years, from the pricing to the act, the pricing to the activity, the sacro-holy summa divisio, between a city medicine and hospital medicine, and it will also be necessary to return to habits, so that all those who take care, can take all their responsibilities.

The answer to the second challenge of aging, and it will be on this point, faster, it is also indispensable. You mentioned it for the first point that matters to me, that of preventing. We must, and this will be at the heart of the pension system that is being built, under the authority of the minister and whose consultation is ongoing, we must better prevent, and therefore throughout life, to encourage employers, to encourage the whole community, here too, to prevent so that everyone can age better and that the inequalities are gradually smoothed, in front of old age. And we need to take into account all the disparities in the pension system, as we are building it. It is then necessary to bring the answers of solidarity, not negotiable, it is moreover what had been the object of my commitment for the minimum old age, which increased from 30 € per month to the 1st of April last and which will increase to the 1st next January 30 €. And I hear murmur in the room, few people at least old age who pay the CSG at full rate. So these are people who have only gained purchasing power. No, but it's a reality. But it's a reality, it's important not to allow misunderstandings. Anyone with a minimum of old age or who has a modest pension, pays a CSG, which is quite normal, and the choice was not to move it, which is a CSG at the reduced rate, I would not suggest that people whose minimum old age has been raised, would have a CSG that would have increased. On the old age, the answer, and therefore on retirement, the answer is obviously the complete overhaul of our pension system, with principles that I want here too clear and simple. I want us to be able to maintain our pay-as-you-go pension system and intergenerational solidarity. It is the choice that has been made, it is the choice that has been made, on which I am committed and it is the solidarism that is at the heart of our Republic. Simply, this complete solidarism, it also goes with the end of a status society, and so it goes to a system that we are building, negotiating, concerter, which will allow a euro contributed to give the same amount of rights. And so that we gradually converge all the existing regimes, which had been built into differences that have become inexplicable today. That's the key to establishing what? On the one hand, the justice of the system in the long term, having a transition period that we assume and also allow confidence in the system, so that everyone can read, immediately, know his rights and for them know that his rights to a € 1 contribution, are the same as that of the neighbor. This is the key to responding to the collective mistrust in which we have settled, and also to meet the challenges of aging, which I recalled a moment ago. On this subject, a law will be presented at the beginning of the year 2019 and will be voted in the first half of the year 2019. The decisions will be taken, they will be clear, a transition time will be granted, and we have chosen, fundamentally, not to make an umpteenth budgetary reform privileging the short-term, to finally make the reform that allows to put flat the building, to recreate confidence and justice, accepting a long tradition.

Speaker: (Inaudible)

THE PRESIDENT: But you are absolutely right, we are in a free inquiry hall, but I like that. On this subject, on this subject, you are absolutely right, we must not forget women, forget about broken and fractured careers, forget about women and men living with disabilities, nor forget the situation of great difficulties. and inequalities in socio-professional risks, and so it is also all that a transparent system will integrate into the parameters and which will be transparent, concerted, negotiated and voted by Parliament. So you are absolutely right.

Finally, on old age, it is obvious that we can no longer delay the answer to be given in terms of dependence. I mentioned earlier the reality, the daily life for many of our fellow citizens for caregivers, for those who share these often dramatic realities. On this point, we also need this, while preventing better to mobilize all the actors, to recognize the part of the family solidarity and to give it a status and a place. The share of collective solidarity, social, finally build the mechanisms responsible for funding and finally agree to have the necessary national debate, which will meet this new risk, which is there and which we need so reply. We know the first estimates, 9 to 10 billion euros tell us some. We also know that the answer is in a mobilization of all the actors, it is in the innovation, it is in the capacity to give a place in the society and to better recognize and remunerate the work of those and those that accompany the dependents, and to ensure the transformation of the establishments, in establishments more medicalized than they are today. This great transformation, it will not happen, either, overnight, the minister has brought a few weeks ago first essential and urgent answers. I know that they do not fully respond to the suffering of those who work in these institutions. I know that they do not fully respond to the indignation, legitimate, of many of our fellow citizens. We will not fix it overnight, I'm not going to make you cookie promises, podium promises, and it's not just a financial commitment, it's going to be there, because we need to invest on this topic. No, we must build a new risk, we must respond to this new social vulnerability, which is dependence. On this subject, the year 2019 will also be devoted to a law that will be passed before the end of the year.

Invest more in people, accompany them so that they regain their dignity whenever they can, and accompany all those who can return to the work towards it, because the emancipation is built by the work as soon as we can, there will always be those who can not, and we must protect them, and be there, and take care of them, and recognize their part in our society, but all those and those who can, be accompanied to do so, and allow our public policies, our collective commitment, and your commitment as well, to be the path of accompaniment and empowerment that enables emancipation in and through work. Because if all those who can do this way do not do it, we will not legitimately have the means to go to finance the legitimate risks and the great vulnerability that I evoked just now. is not true, and we also have to face it, because otherwise we would be lying to each other, and all those who would not want to change anything, who in a sense consider the technological frontier of social justice, would spend more by not empowering anyone, tell me who finances in the end? Always someone, you or your children or those who are not yet born. And so let us make this work of transforming our social policy, by providing this support, by also transforming this place of social work, and for me, this transformation is indispensable if we want to succeed in this path that I evoke. And that's also why what we are doing to enable this emancipation, is to build, at each stage of life, the new individual security, the new securities are no longer status, it is not is more in the society of tomorrow neither unemployment as it existed, nor the RSA, it is the possibility at every moment of life to be reformed, reoriented, to be both protected and accompanied for to be able to emancipate at any moment by this work. The heart of the law that is coming to Parliament right now on the transformation of apprenticeship and skills training is that, and it's a continuum, from great poverty to life all the way through. job. What we need to do is reinvest in the person, it's more support, more empowerment, and not the only answer is the community's money for personal situations. become impersonal. We must go out on all these topics of a logic of window for a logic of accompaniment.

Here, ladies and gentlemen, what I wanted to tell you about these three challenges. I will come back in the coming months to both poverty and health. But I fully embrace this discourse of truth, of collective responsibility which makes me, in my view, the answers to our contemporary challenges can not be the solutions of yesterday, because they did not answer to these challenges and because they have leads to what? To spend more and more, each time responding a little less to the daily reality. What I want together, we can rebuild, inspire deep values, which are yours, which are those of the Republic, which are those of the spirit of 45, is to face the society that is ours, a society made of ruptures, great transformations, great anxieties, this aging that we have long discussed, so that the heart of our response is better prevented, or to re-humanize and to accompany, not to help live in sickness or to live in poverty, but to help get out of the disease and out of poverty.

And to empower all actors, to ensure that everyone in this society should not be treated as being in a state of social or intellectual minority, but that everyone has a part of the solution. So yes, Mr President, to succeed in this transformation, I do not think for a single second that the state can do it alone, I deeply think that this transformation will now be a matter of decisions, acts, details, will be a daily work of the day, where the State will have to take its share of responsibility, but where all the actors, who make the national solidarity, will have to learn to reinvent their role to think these challenges and to participate in this transformation. From that, I know you capable of that, I know we are capable. Long live the Republic and long live France.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

President of the Republic's telephone interview with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo ABE

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published July 10, 2018

Section: International, development and francophonie

The President of the Republic met this afternoon by telephone with the Prime Minister of Japan, Mr. Shinzo Abe.

He expressed his condolences for the victims and their loved ones, as well as the support and all the friendship of France, facing the terrible test traversed by Japan affected by torrential rains.

He congratulated the Japanese Prime Minister for the launch of Japonismes 2018 this week in Paris, which will be a highlight of the cultural relations between our two countries, on the occasion of the 160th anniversary of our diplomatic relations. Japan, represented by its Minister of Foreign Affairs, will also be honored on 14 July.

The thoughts of France will be with our Japanese friends.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Travel and appointments of Mrs. Brigitte Macron – From June 1st to 30th 2018 –

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published 09 July 2018

"Les Parisiennes", directed by Stéphane Jarny, at the Théâtre des Folies Bergère (Paris 9 th)

Funeral of Jean-Claude Boulard, mayor of Le Mans, in the Saint-Julien cathedral of Le Mans (72)

Meeting with Gabriel Attal, MP Hauts-de-Seine

Appointment with Philippe Van Den Herreweghe

Lunch with

Opening of the France-Israel season in the presence of Benyamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister

and his wife, at the Grand Palais (Paris 8 th)

Travel to Canada (Ottawa and Montreal):

– Visit to Ottawa of the De La Salle Secondary Public School alongside Sophie Grégoire-

Trudeau, wife of the Prime Minister of Canada, speaks with students about the fight against

school harassment

– Dinner with Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, and his wife

– Walk in the Old City of Montreal with Philippe Couillard, Prime Minister of

Quebec, and his wife

– Lunch with Suzanne Pilote-Couillard, wife of the Premier of Québec, on the theme

autism

– Reception of the French Community in Montreal

Travel to Canada for the G7 Summit (Charlevoix):

– Official Welcome of the Heads of Delegation by Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, and

his wife

– Lunch of the spouses of the heads of delegation on the theme "Gender equality"

– Visit of Baie-Saint-Paul

– Performance of Cirque du Soleil artists

– Visit the Gardens of Quatre-Vents

Appointment with Laurent Dumas, Founding President of

Home of the

Rendez-vous with Daniel Fereres, President of the Ronald McDonald Foundation and Delphine Smagghe,

vice president of McDonald's France

Appointment with Sébastien Lecornu, Secretary of State to the Minister of State, Minister of

Ecological and Solidary Transition

Meeting with Tony Estanguet, President of the Organizing Committee of the Olympic Games and

Paralympics of Paris 2024

Baroque musical show "Beauty and the Beast … at the Sleeping Wood", directed by Jean-Paul

Bouron, as part of the "Jeudis de l'Elysée"

Appointment with Marie-Pierre Colombel, president of the association Childhood and Sharing, Pierrelune

Betrancourt, secretary general, Valérie-Maud Camus, communication manager and Agathe Morel,

Attorneys

Meeting with Muriel Penicaud, Minister of Labor and Françoise Nyssen, Minister of Culture

Appointment with Sophie Cluzel, secretary of

disabled

Rendez-vous with Andréa Bescond, actress, Mie Kohiyama, journalist and Muriel Salmona,

psychiatrist

Appointment with Jean-Pierre Thébault, Ambassador, in charge of preparing the presidency

French G7

Music Festival at the Palais de l'Elysée

Moving to the Solidays Festival, meeting with the volunteers (Paris 16 th)

Official visit to the Holy See:

– Meeting with His Holiness Pope Francis

– Lunch at Villa Bonaparte in honor of His Most Reverend Eminence Cardinal

Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of His Holiness Pope Francis

– Ceremony at the Basilica of St. John Lateran

Trip to Rome:

– Visit of the Convent of Trinidad-des-Monts

– Visit of the Colosseum and the Forum

Appointment with Jean Pisani-Ferry

Launch of the Women @ Digital Foundation at the Cité des Sciences and Industry (Paris 19 th)

Dinner with parliamentarians and elected representatives from overseas

Meeting with Marlène Schiappa, secretary of

between women and men

House visit

Visit of the exhibitions "Chagall, Lissitzky, Malevich L

"UAM" at the Center Pompidou (Paris 4 th) with Serge Lasvignes

Rendezvous with Israel Nisand, President of the National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians

French

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Tribute of the President of the Republic to Mr. Claude Lanzmann

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published July 06, 2018

Claude Lanzmann wrote in his kaleidoscopic memoirs, The Patagonian Hare (Gallimard, 2009) that "one hundred lives would not be bored". It may be that there have been more, lived, lived or dreamed, present or past, and it is the infinite richness of this existence that France will keep the memory.

The story of these lives crosses the story of the twentieth century, since the maquis of Auvergne where the young Jewish resistant who defined himself as an "old French" was illustrated in the fighting of Mount Mouchet, until his questioning on the future of Israel – discovered in 1952 with a passion that summarizes the title given in 2008 to his interview with Ehud Barak: Lights and Shadows -, through the exploration of the world, from Germany to North Korea, adventures intellectual (his link with Les Temps Modernes was unfailing as was his loyalty to Jean-Paul Sartre), famous love with Simone de Beauvoir or secret with nurse Kim Kun-Sun (substrate of his film Napalm in 2017), turbulent marriages and controversial arguments against Raymond Barre, Elie Wiesel or more recently Yannick Haenel.

But Claude Lanzmann, this great living man, had as companion of road, omnipresent, death. That of his sister, Evelyne, who committed suicide in 1946; that of his son, Félix, who died of cancer at age 25 in 2017. That also of all these unknown, deported death camps, which he found traces and set the grave in the monumental Shoah (1985), narrative labyrinthine, where the faces of the executioners rub shoulders with those of the victims, in a dialogue at a distance where the sudden unstoppable is revealed in an excitement of memory that will never heal.

It is in the hollow of this constant and paradoxical confrontation that Claude Lanzmann, "scholar and artist" (in the words of Pierer Vidal-Naquet), has developed a love of truth and is sometimes carried away by his passions. This look will have built our era.

The President of the Republic extends his sincere condolences to his family and loved ones.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

No to prescription veto at federal level

MIL OSI Translation. Region: Germany / Germany –

Source: Swiss Canton Schaffhausen – news in German

Headline: No to prescription veto at federal level

The Government Council is opposed to the proposed introduction of the ordinance at the federal level, as stated in its statement to the National Council's State Political Commission. The preliminary draft, based on a parliamentary initiative, provides for the possibility for the Federal Assembly to veto the ordinances of the Bundesrat or the Bundesdepartemente.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please forgive us the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

Joint communiqué following the official visit of the President of the Republic, Emmanuel Macron, to Mauritania

MIL OSI Translation. Government of the Republic of France statements from English to French – Published 04 July 2018

Section: International, development and francophonie

Only the date is authentic1st and 2 July 2018

At the invitation of His Excellency the President of the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, His Excellency Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, the President of the French Republic, His Excellency Emmanuel Macron, paid an official visit to Mauritania on 2 and 3 July 2018. The French Head of State was accompanied by the Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs, His Excellency Jean-Yves Le Drian and the Minister of the Armed Forces, Her Excellency Florence Parly. At the same time, President Emmanuel Macron was invited by President Mohamed Ould Abdel Aziz, by the current Chairperson of the African Union, His Excellency Mr. Paul Kagame and by the Chairperson of the African Union Commission, His Excellency Mr. Moussa Faki, addressing the Heads of State and Government participating in the 31st African Union Summit.

This exchange took place on the occasion of the July 2 lunch on "peace and security" in Africa. The French Head of State reiterated France's support for the African Union's initiative to provide autonomous and predictable funding for African military operations. The French Head of State was then invited by his Mauritanian counterpart and by His Excellency the President of Niger, Mr. Mahamadou Issoufou, current Chairman of G5 Sahel, to the meeting of the G5 Sahel member countries. This meeting, which was held at the premises of the G5 Sahel Defense College, in which senior officers called to occupy command posts in the G5 Sahel Joint Force will be trained, provided an update on progress of the Joint Force, particularly with a view to its full operationalization and the realization of international support.

On this occasion, the two Presidents Mauritanian and French renewed their call for a rapid implementation of international support to the joint force. After a face-to-face meeting, the two presidents agreed to strengthen the already rich bilateral partnership between France and Mauritania, which supports many public policies: health, education and higher education, decentralization , renewable energy, water and sanitation, infrastructure, governance, development, etc.

The two Heads of State noted with satisfaction the fact that their bilateral cooperation is reflected in areas of excellence where Mauritania can serve as a referent on the regional and international scene, such as the renewable energy sector, which is consistent with their joint commitment, in the framework of COP 21, to fight against climate change. The two presidents are pleased that many of these interventions are fully in line with the objectives of the Sahel Alliance, promoted by several technical and financial partners and the Sahel countries, for the benefit of southern regions of Mauritania. and from the east of the country. The President of the French Republic, His Excellency Emmanuel Macron, commended Mauritania's efforts and the concrete results it has achieved for its development and also for the

secure its vast territory, as well as for the implementation of the comprehensive approach it adopts in the fight against violent extremism. A multifaceted approach that includes: the fight against terrorism through the defense of its borders and the action of its internal security forces but also its contribution to the joint G5 Sahel Force; the determination against cross-border crime including drug trafficking – which contributes to the financing of terrorism; defining policies to prevent extremism; the implementation of development actions to meet the basic needs of the population; finally, a reaffirmed presence of the State and its services throughout the territory. This tête-à-tête between the two French and Mauritanian leaders, which took place in a warm and friendly atmosphere and was followed by several talks, in particular between the French Minister Mr. Le Drian and his Mauritanian counterpart, His Excellency Mr. Ismail Ould Sheikh Ahmed, Minister Ms. Parly and her Mauritanian counterpart, His Excellency Diallo Mamadou Bathia before the extended meeting between the French delegation and several members of the Mauritanian Government, was an opportunity to reaffirm that Mauritania and France are strategic partners for each other, and this for a long time, whether in the field of regional security but also in the field of economy and development. On this occasion, three financing agreements of the French Development Agency (AFD) for a total amount of 19,650,000 euros, equivalent to 815,500,000 UM, were signed by, on the one hand, the Mauritanian Minister of Economy and Finance, His Excellency Mr. El Moctar Ould Djay and, on the other hand, His Excellency Mr. Jean-Yves Le Drian, French Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs and the Director General of the AFD, in favor of education and vocational training as well as food security, in particular by the rehabilitation of irrigated perimeters in rural areas. The two Presidents agree that higher education is a privileged field of cooperation and, to this end, France intends to continue its support to Mauritania in its process of setting up preparatory programs for the great French engineering schools of France and Maghreb. At the same time, a project is being implemented to promote the employability of students through the mastery of Arabic and French languages, in particular with French and Mauritanian universities.

The two Presidents gave the necessary instructions to reinforce the Mauritanian and French private sectors in their rapprochement, in the spirit of a win-win partnership, particularly in the hydrocarbons sector. In this regard, the two Heads of State welcome the conclusion between the Total Group and the Minister of Petroleum, Energy and Mines of the Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation for the Exploration and Development of Potentialities off-shore in Mauritania. French and Mauritanian companies can also help Mauritania to play a pivotal role in strengthening regional economic integration. In this context, the next MEDEF French mission to Nouakchott is to be welcomed in July, in partnership with the Mauritanian Employers' Union. Both parties note that new private provisions and initiatives to encourage public-private partnership are also an opportunity to strengthen economic ties. The event organized on 2 July by the young Chamber of Commerce of Mauritania in the presence of members of the Presidential Council for Africa who accompanied the French President, also demonstrated the role of young Mauritanian entrepreneurs, especially young women, in the future of the economic relationship between our two friendly countries.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please accept our apologies should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.

South Sudan: The UN applauds the condemnation of soldiers for the assault on the Hotel Terrain in 2016

MIL OSI Translation. Region: Spanish / Latin America / UN –

Source: United Nations – in Spanish 2

Headline: South Sudan: The UN applauds the condemnation of soldiers for the assault on the Hotel Terrain in 2016

The United Nations mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) celebrated the sentence of a military court that finds 10 South Sudanese soldiers guilty of committing violent acts against civilians in the Terrain Hotel in Juba, the capital of the country, in 2016.

EDITOR'S NOTE: This article is a translation. Please forgive us should the grammar and / or sentence structure not be perfect.